In a replication of Turkheimer, Haley, Waldron, D’Onofrio, Gottesman II (2003, Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14:623-628), we investigate genotype–environment (G × E) interaction in the cognitive aptitude of 839 twin pairs who completed the National Merit Scholastic Qualifying Test in 1962. Shared environmental influences were stronger for adolescents from poorer homes, while genetic influences were stronger for adolescents from more affluent homes. No significant differences were found between parental income and parental education interaction effects. Results suggest that environmental differences between middle- to upper-class families influence the expression of genetic potential for intelligence, as has previously been suggested by Bronfenbrenner and Ceci’s (1994, Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model Psychological Review, 101:568-586) bioecological model.
Gene-environment interaction Intelligence Socioeconomic status Cognitive aptitude
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Brofenbrenner U., Ceci SJ (1994) Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev 101:568–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button TMM, Scourfield J, Martin N, Purcell S., McGuffin P (2005) Family dysfunction interacts with genes in the causation of antisocial symptoms. Behav Genet 35:115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo G, Stearns E (2002) The social influences on the realization of genetic potential for intellectual development. Social Forces 80:881–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen AR (1998) The g factor: the science of mental ability. Preager,Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
Johnson W, Krueger RF (2005) Higher perceived life control decreases genetic variance in physical health: evidence from a national twin study. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:165–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehlin JC, Nichols RC (1976) Heredity, environment, and personality: a study of 850 sets of twins. University of Texas Press, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
Martin NG, Jardine R, Eaves LJ (1984) Is there only one set of genes for different abilities? A reanalysis of the National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (NMSQT) data. Behav Genet 14:355–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2004) Mplus user’s guide 3rd edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Nichols RC, Bilbro WC (1966) The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica 16:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
Purcell S (2002) Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res 5:554–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe DC, Jacobson KE, van den Oord E. (1999) Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: parental education level as a moderator. Child Dev 70:1151–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe DC, Vesterdal WJ, Rodgers JL (1999) Herrnstein’s syllogism: genetic and shared environmental influences on IQ, education, and income. Intelligence 26:405–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar