Behavior Genetics

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 229–237 | Cite as

Genetic Analysis of Sensation Seeking with an Extended Twin Design

  • R. D. StoelEmail author
  • E. J. C. De Geus
  • D. I. Boomsma


The heritability of sensation seeking is investigated in an extended twin design, including mono- and dizygotic twins and their siblings. Besides a comparison of the phenotypic resemblance between monozygotic twins and dizygotic twins, the design allows for an explicit test of the assumption that results from twins may be generalized to the singleton population. Secondly, the design offers the opportunity to investigate to what extent the influence of common environment is the same for males and females and for twins and siblings, i.e. allowing for explicit tests of a special twin environment and of a sex-specific common environment. The results indicate that individual variation in sensation seeking is heritable, with few differences between males and females in heritability estimates for the sensation seeking dimensions. In contrast to prior studies, evidence is found for common environmental influences for thrill and adventure seeking in males, and experience seeking and boredom susceptibility in females. Evidence for a special twin environment was limited to boredom susceptibility in females.


Environmental correlation extended twin design heritability sensation seeking special twin environment 


  1. Arnett J. (1990). Drunk driving, sensation seeking, and egocentrism among adolescents. Pers. Individ. Dif. 11: 541–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron E. N., Aron A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 345–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlyne D. E., Madsen K. B. (1973). Pleasure, and reward preference: Their nature, determinants, and role in behavior. New York, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Boomsma D. I., Vink J. M., van Beijsterveldt T. C. E. M., de Geus E. J. C., Beem A. L., Mulder E. J. C. M. et al. (2002). Netherlands twin register: A focus on longitudinal research. Twin Res. 5: 401–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dolan C. V., Boomsma D. I., Neale M. C. (1999). A note on the power provided by sibships of size 3 and 4 in genetic covariance modeling of a codominant QTL. Behav. Genet. 29: 163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eysenck H. J. (1983). A biometrical-genetical analysis of impulsive and sensation seeking behavior. In: Zuckerman M. (eds) Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity, and anxiety. Hillside, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 1–27Google Scholar
  7. Feij J. A., Dekker P. H., Koopmans J. R., Boomsma D. I. (1997). Nieuwe normen en stabiliteits gegevens voor de Spanningsbehoeftelijst (SBL). Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie 52: 131–134Google Scholar
  8. Feij, J. A. and Taris, T. W. (2005). Beyond the genetic basis of sensation seeking: The influences of birth order, family size and parenting styles. Submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  9. Feij J. A., van Zuilen R. W. (1984). Handleiding bij de spanningsbehoeftelijst (SBL). Lisse, Swets & ZeitlingerGoogle Scholar
  10. Feij J. A., van Zuilen R. W., Gazendam A. (1982). De ontwikkeling van een Nederlandse vragenlijst voor sensation seeking: de Spanningsbehoeftelijst (SBL). Gedrag 10: 364–383Google Scholar
  11. Franken R. E., Hill R., Kierstead J. (1994). Sport Interest As Predicted by the Personality Measures of Competitiveness, Mastery, Instrumentality, Expressivity, and Sensation Seeking. Pers. Individ. Dif. 17: 467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fulker D. W., Eysenck S. B. G., Zuckerman M. (1980). A genetic and environmental-analysis of sensation seeking. J. Res. Pers. 14: 261–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldsmith H. H., Rieserdanner L. A., Briggs S. (1991). Evaluating convergent and discriminant validity of temperament questionnaires for preschoolers, toddlers, and infants. Dev. Psychol. 27: 566–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gottfried A. W., Gottfried A. E., Bathurst K., Guerin D. (1994). Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects. Plenum PublishingGoogle Scholar
  15. Hur Y. M., Bouchard T. J. (1997). The genetic correlation between impulsivity and sensation seeking traits. Behav. Genet. 27: 455–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jack S. J., Ronan K. R. (1998). Sensation seeking among high- and low-risk sports participants. Pers. Individ. Dif. 25: 1063–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joireman J., Anderson J., Strathman A. (2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84: 1287–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalichman S. C., Rompa D. (1995). Sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales – reliability, validity, and predicting HIV risk behavior. J. Pers. Assess. 65: 586–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koopmans J. R., Boomsma D. I., Heath A. C., van Doornen L. J. P. (1995). A multivariate genetic-analysis of sensation seeking. Behav. Genet. 25: 349–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Little R. J. A., Rubin D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, WileyGoogle Scholar
  21. Lourey E., McLachlan A. (2003). Elements of sensation seeking and their relationship with two aspects of humor appreciation – perceived funniness and overt expression. Pers. Individ. Dif. 35: 277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magnus P., Berg K., Nance W. E. (1983). Predicting zygosity in norwegian twin pairs born 1915–1960. Clin. Genet. 24: 103–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G. and Maes, H. H. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (5th ed.) [Computer software]. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of PsychiatryGoogle Scholar
  24. Pliner P., Melo N. (1997). Food neophobia in humans: Effects of manipulated arousal and individual differences in sensation seeking. Physiol. Behav. 61: 331–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Posthuma D., Boomsma D. I. (1999). Adding non-twin siblings to increase power. Behav. Genet. 29: 366Google Scholar
  26. Posthuma D., Boomsma D. I. (2000). A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs. Behav. Genet. 30: 147–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Posthuma D., de Geus E. J. C., Neale M. C., Pol H. E. H., Baare W. E. C., Kahn R. S. et al. (2000). Multivariate genetic analysis of brain structure in an extended twin design. Behav. Genet. 30: 311–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Potgieter J., Bisschoff F. (1990). Sensation seeking among medium-risk and low-risk sports participants. Percept. Mot. Skills 71: 1203–1206Google Scholar
  29. Prescott C. A., Cross R. J., Kuhn J. W., Horn J. L., Kendler K. S. (2004). Is risk for alcoholism mediated by individual differences in drinking motivations?. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 28: 29–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raine A., Reynolds C., Venables P. H., Mednick S. A. (2002). Stimulation seeking and intelligence: A prospective longitudinal study. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82: 663–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zuckerman M. (1969). Theoretical formulations. In: Zubeck J. P. (eds) Sensory deprivation: Fifteen years of research. New York, Appleton-Century, pp. 407–432Google Scholar
  32. Zuckerman M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 36: 45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zuckerman M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdal, NJ, ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuckerman M. (1993). P-impulsive sensation seeking and its behavioral, psychophysiological and biochemical correlates. Neuropsychobiology 28: 30–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuckerman M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Zuckerman M. (2002). Genetics of sensation seeking. In: Benjamin J., Ebstein R. P., Belmake R. H. (eds) Molecular genetics and the human personality. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, pp. 193–210Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Stoel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • E. J. C. De Geus
    • 1
  • D. I. Boomsma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological PsychologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations