Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic seismic analysis of base-isolated structures with electromagnetic inertial mass dampers considering different soil conditions

  • S.I. : Advances on Inerter-based Seismic Protection of Structures
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An electromagnetic inertial mass damper (EIMD) is an inerter-based damper that can significantly enhance the seismic performance of a frame structure. However, the stochastic seismic analysis of a base-isolated structure (BIS) with the EIMD subjected to earthquake ground motions has rarely been reported. Based on a probabilistic framework, this paper studies the stochastic seismic responses of the BIS with the EIMD subjected to seismic excitations considering three typical soil conditions. The analytical solutions of the response variances of a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) BIS-EIMD system are derived considering both stationary and non-stationary seismic excitations. A parametric study on the BIS-EIMD system subjected to stochastic seismic excitations modeled by filtered Kanai-Tajimi spectrum is conducted to investigate the different seismic responses under firm, medium, and soft soil conditions, and the corresponding optimal inertance and damping of the EIMD are obtained by minimizing the stochastic seismic responses of the superstructure or the base floor. The results of the 2DOF BIS-EIMD system indicate that the optimal EIMD achieves comparable control performance under the three soil conditions, but the optimal parameters of the EIMD vary significantly under different soil conditions. Under soft soil conditions, the BIS-EIMD system requires a much larger inertance setting compared with that of the firm and medium soil conditions. A numerical simulation of a seven-story isolated building with an EIMD is conducted considering both artificial seismic excitations and real earthquake ground motions. Numerical results show that the EIMD is capable of significantly suppressing the seismic responses of both the base floor and the superstructure, which is better than that of a conventional viscous damper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali SF, Ramaswamy A (2009) Hybrid structural control using magnetorheological dampers for base isolated structures. Smart Mater Struct 18(5):055011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholdt H (1997) Structural dynamics for engineering. Thomas Teldfort, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Li C, Chen X (2020) Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers-inerters for structures under harmonic ground acceleration. Smart Struct Syst 26(1):49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Junya K, Masahiro I, Kohju I, Norio I (2016) Viscoelastically supported viscous mass damper incorporated into a seismic isolation system. J Earthq Tsunami 10(3):1640009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGrawHill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Code for seismic design of buildings: GB 5011–2010 (2010). Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press

  • De Domenico D, Ricciardi G (2018b) An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(5):1169–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis M, Giaralis A, Petrini F, Pietrosanti D (2019) Optimal tuning and assessment of inertial dampers with grounded inerter for vibration control of seismically excited base-isolated systems. Eng Struct 196:109250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico D, Impollonia N, Ricciardi G (2018a) Soil-dependent optimum design of a new passive vibration control system combining seismic base isolation with tuned inerter damper. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 105:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico D, Deastra P, Ricciardi G, Sims ND, Wagg DJ (2019) Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings. J Franklin I 356(14):7626–7649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 8 (2004), Design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), EN 1998–1. www.eurocodes. jrc.eceuropa.eu/. Last accessed Feb 2016

  • Fardis MN, Carvalho E, Alnashai A, Faccioli E, Pinto P, Plumier A (2009) Designers’ guide to EN 1998–1 and 1998–5. In: Gulvanessian H (ed) Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistant structures. Thomas Telford Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaralis A, Petrini F (2017) Wind-induced vibration mitigation in tall buildings using the tuned mass-damper-inerter. J Struct Eng 143(9):04017127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaralis A, Taflanidis AA (2018) Optimal tuned mas-damper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria. Struct Control Health Monit 25(2):e2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jangid RS (2007) Optimum lead–rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions. Eng Struct 29(10):2503–2513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpakidis IV, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS (2010) Modeling strength degradation in lead–rubber bearings under earthquake shaking. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(13):1533–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JM (1999) The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Cao L (2019) High performance active tuned mass damper inerter for structures under the ground acceleration. Earthq Struct 16(2):149–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Chen J (2009) Stochastic dynamics of structures. John Wiley and Sons, Asia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Shen W, Zhu HP (2019) Vibration mitigation of stay cables using electromagnetic inertial mass dampers: full-scale experiment and analysis. Eng Struct 200:109693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK (1976) Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics. R. E. Krieger Pub.Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marian L, Giaralis A (2017) The tuned mass-damper-inerter for harmonic vibrations suppression, attached mass reduction, and energy harvesting. Smart Struct Syst 19(6):665–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakaminami S, Kida H, Ikago K, Inoue N (2012) Response characteristics of a base-isolated structure incorporated with a force-restricted viscous mass damper. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Nakamura Y, Fukukita A, Tamura K, Yamazaki I, Matsuoka T, Hiramoto K, Sunakoda K (2014) Seismic response control using electromagnetic inertial mass dampers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(4):507–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrini F, Giaralis A, Wang Z (2020) Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting. Eng Struct 204:109904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrosanti D, De Angelis M, Giaralis A (2021) Experimental seismic performance assessment and numerical modelling of nonlinear inerter vibration absorber (IVA)-equipped base isolated structures tested on shaking table. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 50:2732–2753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribakov Y, Gluck J (2002) Selective controlled base isolation system with magnetorheological dampers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(6):1301–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WH (1982) Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 10(4):593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussis PC, Constantinou MC, Erdik M, Durukal E, Dicleli M (2003) Assessment of performance of seismic isolation system of Bolu Viaduct. J Br Eng 8(4):182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahasrabudhe S, Nagarajaiah S (2005) Experimental study of sliding base-isolated buildings with magnetorheological dampers in near-fault earthquakes. J Struct Eng 131(7):1025–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Niyitangamahoro A, Feng Z, Zhu HP (2019) Tuned inerter dampers for civil structures subjected to earthquake ground motions: optimum design and seismic performance. Eng Struct 198:109470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Long Z, Wang H, Zhu HP (2021) Power analysis of SDOF structures with tuned inerter dampers subjected to earthquake ground motions. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg 7:010907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M (1991) Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Appl Mech Rev 44(4):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MC (2002) Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(10):1648–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Zuo L, Wang X, Peng J, Wang W (2019) Exact H2 optimal solutions to inerter-based isolation systems for building structures. Struct Control Health Monit 26(6):e2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Gao H, Xu Y, Chen ZQ, Wang H (2019) Impact of cable sag on the efficiency of an inertial mass damper in controlling stay cable vibrations. Smart Struct Syst 24(1):83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Shen W, Li Y, Zhu HP, Zhu S (2021) Dynamic behavior and seismic performance of base-isolated structures with electromagnetic inertial mass dampers: analytical solutions and simulations. Eng Struct 246:113072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye K, Shu S, Hu L, Zhu HP (2019) Analytical solution of seismic response of base-isolated structure with supplemental inerter. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48(9):1083–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Zhao Z, Pan C, Ikago K, Xue S (2020) Damping enhancement principle of inerter system. Struct Control Health Monit 27(5):e2523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Zhang R, Jiang Y, Pan C (2019) Seismic response mitigation of structures with a friction pendulum inerter system. Eng Struct 193:110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu HP, Li Y, Shen W, Zhu S (2019) Mechanical and energy-harvesting model for electromagnetic inertial mass dampers. Mech Syst Signal Pr 120:203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51838006), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No.: HUST_ 2018KFYYX JJ007). The last author also acknowledges the partial support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Grant Nos. PolyU 15214620 and N_PolyU533/17). We also appreciate the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center for providing the earthquake ground motion records.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenai Shen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Shen, W., Zhu, H. et al. Stochastic seismic analysis of base-isolated structures with electromagnetic inertial mass dampers considering different soil conditions. Bull Earthquake Eng 21, 1601–1626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01231-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01231-9

Keywords

Navigation