Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic tensile-compressive tests on thin concrete boundary elements with a single layer of reinforcement prone to out-of-plane instability

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing need for residential housing in Latin American countries has led to the construction of reinforced concrete buildings with wall thicknesses as low as 8–10 cm. Such walls have typically only a single layer of vertical rebars and are therefore particularly susceptible to out-of-plane failure. In order to investigate the response of the corresponding wall boundary elements, twelve reinforced concrete members with a single layer of vertical rebars were tested under tension–compression cycles. The objective was to gain insight into the parameters governing wall instability and out-of-plane failure, namely the thickness, reinforcement ratio, and eccentricity of the longitudinal rebars with respect to the member axis. This paper summarises the results of the test program, where the specimens' response is analysed also at the global and local levels. The results show that the crack pattern has an important influence on the out-of-plane behaviour and the conditions leading to out-of-plane failure are described. Furthermore, the differences between members with a single layer of vertical rebars and members with two layers are discussed. The influence of the parameters considered in the experimental program is addressed, showing that sections with small thickness and large reinforcement content are more prone to out-of-plane failures. Finally, predictions given by existing models are compared to the new experimental data. The entire data set is publicly available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo CE, Creagh A, Moehle JP, et al (2010) Seismic vulnerability of non-special boundary element of shear wall under axial force reversals. Report, Florida International University and University of California, Berkley, USA

  • Almeida JP, Prodan O, Rosso A, Beyer K (2016) Tests on thin reinforced concrete walls subjected to in-plane and out-of-plane cyclic loading. Earthq Spectra 33:323–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arteta CA, Sánchez J, Daza R, et al (2017) Global and local demand limits of thin reinforced concrete structural wall building systems. In: 16th world conference on earthquake engineering. Santiago, Chile

  • Carrillo J, Alcocer SM, Aperador W (2013) Propiedades mecánicas del concreto para viviendas de bajo costo. Ing Investig y Tecnol 14:285–298

    Google Scholar 

  • CEB (1978) Model code for concrete structures. Comité Euro International du Béton, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai YH, Elayer DT (1999) Lateral stability of reinforced concrete columns under axial reversed cyclic tension and compression. ACI Struct J 96:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysanidis TA, Tegos IA (2012) The influence of tension strain of wall ends to their resistance against lateral instability for low-reinforced concrete walls. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering. Lisboa, Portugal

  • Creagh A, Acevedo C, Moehle JP, et al (2010) Seismic performance of concrete special boundary element. Report, University of Texas at Austin and University of California Berkley, USA

  • Dashti F, Dhakal R, Pampanin S (2017) Blind prediction of the response of a thin singly reinforced concrete flanged wall. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0211-x

  • FIB (2010) Model code for concrete structures. Fédération Internationale du Béton, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • González V, Botero JC, Rochel R et al (2005) Propiedades mecánicas del acero de refuerzo utilizado en Colombia. Ing y Cienc 1:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsir WJ (1985) The design of coupled frame-wall structures for seismic actions. PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Herrick CK, Kowalsky MJ (2016) Out-of-plane buckling of ductile reinforced structural walls due to in-plane loads. ASCE Struct J 143. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001660

  • Hilson CW, Segura CL, Wallace JW (2014) Experimental study of longitudinal reinforcement buckling in reinforced concrete structural wall boundary elements. In: 10th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering. Anchorage, Alaska

  • Mejia LG, Ortiz JC, Osorio G. LI (2004) Housing report—concrete shear wall buildings, report #109. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) and International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE), Colombia

  • Menegon SJ, Wilson JL, Gad EF, Lam NTK (2015) Out-of-plane buckling of limited ductile reinforced concrete walls under cyclic loads. In: 2015 NZSEE conference. Rotorua, New Zealand

  • Miranda E, Thompson CL, Bertero VV (1990) Cyclic behaviour of shear wall boundary elements incorporating prefabricated welded wire hoops. Report to sponsor Baumann engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California at Berkley, USA

  • NDI (2009) Optotrak certus HD, Northern Digital Inc. http://www.ndigital.com/industrial/certushd.php. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  • NSR-10 (2010) Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sismo Resistente—Comisión Asesora Permanente para el Règimen de Construcciones Sismo Resistentes. Bogotá D.C., Colombia

  • Parra PF (2016) Stability of reinforced concrete wall boundaries. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, USA

  • Parra PF, Moehle JP (2014) Lateral Buckling in Reinforced Concrete Walls. In: 10th U.S. National conference on earthquake engineering. Anchorage, Alaska

  • Paulay T, Goodsir WJ (1985) The ductility of structural walls. Bull N Z Natl Soc Earthq Eng 18:250–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1993) Stability of ductile structural walls. ACI Struct J 90:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso A, Almeida JP, Beyer K (2016) Stability of thin reinforced concrete walls under cyclic loads: state-of-the-art and new experimental findings. Bull Earthq Eng 14:455–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso A, Almeida JP, Beyer K (2017a) Numerical simulation with fibre beam-column models of thin RC columns under cyclic tensile-compressive loading. In: 16th World conference on earthquake engineering. Santiago, Chile

  • Rosso A, Jimenez-Roa LA, Almeida JP, Beyer K (2017b) Instability of thin single-layered RC walls under cyclic loading: numerical simulation of walls and improved equivalent boundary elements. Submitted to: Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

  • Rosso A, Jiménez L, Almeida JP, Beyer K (2017c) Experimental campaign on thin RC columns prone to out-of-plane instability: numerical simulation using shell element models. In: VIII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Sísmica. Barranquilla, Colombia

  • Scolari M (2017) Implementation of PARC_CL 2.0 crack model for reinforced concrete members subjected to cyclic and dynamic loading. PhD Thesis, Parma, Italy

  • SIA (1989) SIA 162, Material tests. Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Sritharan S, Beyer K, Henry RS et al (2014) Understanding poor seismic performance of concrete walls and design implications. Earthq Spectra 30:307–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb R, Tani M, Kono S et al (2016) Performance of confined boundary regions of RC walls under cyclic reversal loadings. J Adv Concr Technol 14:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JW, Massone LM, Bonelli P et al (2012) Damage and implications for seismic design of RC structural wall buildings. Earthq Spectra 28:S281–S299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welt TS, Massone LM, LaFave JM, et al (2016) Confinement behavior of rectangular reinforced concrete prisms simulating wall boundary elements. ASCE Struct J 318

Download references

Acknowledgments

The testing of the specimens was financed through an EPFL Seed Money grant through the EPFL Cooperation & Development Center, which was awarded to the EESD group (PI) and the University of Valle, the E.I.A. University and the University of Medellin, in Colombia (Co-PIs). The first author is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 200021_132315 ‘Seismic design and assessment of reinforced concrete core walls - Phase II’. All contributions are gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank all engineers, technicians and students who helped with the laboratory testing, in particular David Grisot and Pierre Jailin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Beyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosso, A., Jiménez-Roa, L.A., de Almeida, J.P. et al. Cyclic tensile-compressive tests on thin concrete boundary elements with a single layer of reinforcement prone to out-of-plane instability. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 859–887 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0228-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0228-1

Keywords

Navigation