Skip to main content
Log in

Inelastic behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tubes: monotonic versus cyclic response

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a computational procedure for determining the response of circular concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) columns to monotonic loading is developed. Firstly, the basis of the proposed method is established by creating accurate three-dimensional nonlinear finite element models of these columns, which are validated by comparing their response results with those of experimental tests that are available in the literature. Then, these models are used for an extensive parametric study that determines the response to monotonic lateral loads of 192 circular CFT specimens with fairly broad values of diameter-to-thickness ratios, yield stress of steel tube, compressive strength of concrete core and axial load levels. On the basis of this response databank, empirical expressions are developed to estimate the force–displacement behavior of circular CFT columns under monotonic loading with simple yet reliable manner. The validity of these empirical expressions is verified by comparing their results with those of experimental tests. It is found that the proposed expressions can effectively describe the force–displacement behavior and capacity of circular CFT columns under monotonic loading conditions. These expressions are also used in pushover analysis of a simple frame consisting of steel beams and CFT columns in order to demonstrate their applicability and usefulness in simple practical problems. Finally, the proposed method, of determining the response of composite structures to monotonic lateral loading is compared with nonlinear time-history response analysis of these structures and useful conclusions are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ATENA (2012) Advanced tool for engineering nonlinear analysis, version 4,3,1g. Prague, Červenka Consulting Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltay P, Gjelsvik A (1990) Coefficient of friction for steel on concrete at high normal stress. J Mater Civil Eng ASCE 2(1):46–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beheshti-Aval SB (2012) Strength evaluation of concrete-filled steel tubes subjected to axial-flexural loading by ACI and AISC-LRFD codes along with three dimensional nonlinear analysis. Int J Civil Eng 10(4):280–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr AJ (2008) HYSTERES and RUAUMOKO-2D inelastic time-history analysis of two dimensional framed structures. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacón R (2015) Circular concrete-filled tubular columns: state of the art oriented to the vulnerability assessment. Open Civil Eng J 9:249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Cofie NG, Krawinkler H (1985) Uniaxial cyclic stress-strain behavior of structural steel. J Eng Mech ASCE 111(9):1105–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardization (2004) Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures, Part 1.1. General rules and rules for buildings, EN 1994-1-1, Brussels

  • European Committee for Standardization (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1, Brussels

  • FEMA-273 (1997) Building seismic safety council, NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings”. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J, Jacobson R (1967) Structural behavior of concrete filled steel tubes. ACI J 64(7):404–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Sarda SM, Kumar MS (2007) Experimental and computational study of concrete filled steel tubular columns under axial loads. J Constr Steel Res 63(2):182–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajjar JF, Gourley BC (1996) Representation of concrete filled steel tube cross-section strength. J Struct Eng ASCE 122:1327–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han LH, Lu H, Yao GH, Liao FY (2006) Further study on the flexural behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubes. J Constr Steel Res 62(6):554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzigeorgiou GD (2008a) Numerical model for the behavior and capacity of circular CFT columns part I: theory. Eng Struct 30(6):1573–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzigeorgiou GD (2008b) Numerical model for the behavior and capacity of circular CFT columns, part II: verification and extension. Eng Struct 30(6):1579–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2005) Minimum cost design of fibre-reinforced concrete-filled steel tubular columns. J Constr Steel Res 61(2):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao PC, Kazuhiro Hayashi K, Nishi R, Lin XC, Nakashima M (2014) Investigation of concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular columns with ultrahigh-strength steel. J Struct Eng 141(7):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Inai E, Mukai A, Kai M, Tokinoya H, Fukumoto T, Mori K (2004) Behavior of concrete-filled steel tube beam columns. J Struct Eng ASCE 130(2):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaris GS, Skalomenos KA, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2016) Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel/concrete composite moment resisting frames. Eng Struct 115:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles RB, Park R (1969) Strength of concrete filled steel tubular columns. J Struct Eng 95(ST12):2565–2587

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Goel C (1988) Cyclic load behavior of concrete-filled tubular braces. J Struct Eng ASCE 114(7):1488–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marohnić T, Basan R, Franulović M (2015) Evaluation of the possibility of estimating cyclic stress–strain parameters and curves from monotonic properties of steels. Proc Eng 101:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menétrey PH, Willam KJ (1995) Triaxial failure criterion for concrete and its generalization. ACI Struct J 92(3):311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Park RJT, Priestley MJN, Walpole WR (1983) Reinforced concrete bridge piles. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering; 16

  • Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note No. 902, National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics, Washington DC

  • Sakino K, Nakahara H, Morino S, Nishiyama I (2004) Behavior of centrally loaded concrete-filled steel tube short columns. J Struct Eng ASCE 124:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAP 2000 (1998) Analysis reference, structural and earthquake engineering software, computer and structures

  • Satyarno I, Carr AJ, Restrepo J (1998) Refined pushover analysis for the assessment of older reinforced concrete buildings. In: NZSEE technology conference, Wairakei, New Zealand, pp 75–82

  • Schneider SP (1998) Axially loaded concrete-filled steel tubes. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(10):1125–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serras DN, Skalomenos KA, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2016) Modeling of circular concrete-filled steel tubes subjected to cyclic lateral loading. Struct J 8(1):75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Mamaghani IHP, Mizuno E, Usami T (1995) Cyclic behavior of structural steels II: theory. J Eng Mech ASCE 121(11):1165–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi G, Wang M, Bai Y, Wang F, Shi Y, Wang Y (2012) Experimental and modeling study of high-strength structural steel under cyclic loading. J Eng Struct 32:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalomenos KA, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2015) Modeling level selection for seismic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube/moment-resisting frames by using fragility curves. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(2):199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalomenos KA, Hayashi K, Nishi R, Inamasu H, Nakashima M (2016) Experimental behavior of concrete-filled steel tube columns using ultrahigh-strength steel. J Struct Eng ASCE 142(9):04016057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomii M, Sakino K (1979) Elasto-plastic behavior of concrete filled square steel tubular beam-column. Trans Arch Inst Japan 280:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucak A, Tsopelas P (2012) Accurate modeling of the cyclic response of structural components constructed of steel with yield plateau. J Eng Struct 35:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uy B (2000) Strength of concrete filled steel box columns incorporating local buckling. J Struct Eng ASCE 126:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma HA, Ricles JM, Sause R, Lu LW (2002) Seismic behavior and modeling of high-strength composite concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) beam-columns. J Constr Steel Res 58:725–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George D. Hatzigeorgiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serras, D.N., Skalomenos, K.A., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. et al. Inelastic behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tubes: monotonic versus cyclic response. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 5413–5434 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0186-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0186-7

Keywords

Navigation