Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 827–860 | Cite as

On the design of a dense array to extract rotational components of earthquake ground motion

  • Dhiman Basu
  • Andrew S. Whittaker
  • Michael C. Constantinou
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Data recorded from dense seismic arrays such as the Large Scale Seismic Testing array in Lotung, Taiwan, are used for multiple purposes, including development of attenuation and coherency functions, computing dynamic strains in soil, and estimating rotational components of ground motion. The required footprint of a seismic array deployed to compute rotational components of ground motion is a function of the method used for the computations and site specific characteristics, including the apparent seismic wave velocity and the frequency content of expected ground motions. A design procedure for a general two-dimensional seismic array is presented together with a site-specific example using the Surface Distribution Method to extract the rotational components of ground motion. A sensitivity study is performed to determine how the location of recording stations of translational motion in a dense array affects the computed rotational components of earthquake ground motion.

Keywords

Seismic array Array dimensions Rotational components Sensitivity study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support for the studies described herein was provided by MCEER (www.mceer.buffalo.edu) under Thrust Area 3, Innovative Technologies, through a grant from the State of New York. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Institute of Earth Science, Academia, Sinica, Taiwan for sharing strong motion data. The financial support, technical review and provision of data are gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of either MCEER or the State of New York.

References

  1. Basu D, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2012a) On estimating rotational components of ground motion using data recorded at a single station. J Eng Mech ASCE 138(9):1141–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu D, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2012b) Characterizing the rotational components of earthquake ground motion. MCEER-12-0005, University at Buffalo, State Universuty of New York, Buffalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu D, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2013) Extracting rotational components of earthquake ground motion using data recorded at multiple stations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42(3):451–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu D, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS (2014) An equivalent accidental eccentricity to account for the effects of torsional ground motion on structures. Eng Struct 69:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu D, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2015) Characterizing rotational components of earthquake ground motion using a surface distribution method and response of sample structures. Eng Struct 99:685–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1986) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodin P, Gomberg J, Singh SK, Santoyo M (1997) Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the valley of Mexico, part I: three-dimensional strains and rotations recorded on a seismic array. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3):528–539Google Scholar
  8. Bycroft GN (1980) Soil-foundation interaction and differential ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellani A, Boffi G (1986) Rotational components of the surface ground motion during and earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castellani A, Boffi G (1989) On the rotational components of seismic motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 18:785–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung JK (2007) Estimation of ground strain using accelerograms recorded by two dense seismic arrays at Lotung, Taiwan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 18(4):715–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De-La-Llera JC, Chopra AK (1994) Accidental torsion in buildings due to base rotational excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23:1003–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomberg J (1997) Dynamic deformations and M 6.7, Northridge, California earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16:471–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart G, DiJulio M, Lew M (1975) Torsional response of high-rise buildings. J Struct Div ASCE 101:397–414Google Scholar
  15. Kerekes AK (2001) Seismic array design by spatial convolution. Geophysics 66(4):1195–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laouami N, Labbe P (2002) Experimental analysis of seismic torsional ground motion recorded by the LSST-Lotung array. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:2141–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1985) Torsional acceleragrams. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 4:132–139Google Scholar
  18. Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1987) Rocking strong earthquake accelerations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 6:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li H-N, Sun L-Y, Wang S-Y (2004) Improved approach for obtaining rotational components of seismic motion. Nucl Eng Des 232:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lomnitz C (1997) Frequency response of a strainmeter. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(4):1078–1080Google Scholar
  21. Newmark NM (1969) Torsion in symmetrical buildings. In: Proceedings fourth world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp 19–32Google Scholar
  22. Niazi M (1986) Inferred displacements, velocities and rotations of a long rigid foundation located at El Centro differential array site during the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penzien J, Watabe M (1975) Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Politopoulos I (2010) Response of seismically isolated structures to rocking-type excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:325–342Google Scholar
  25. Sheikhabadi MRF (2014) Simplified relations for the application of rotational components to seismic design codes. Eng Struct 59:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spudich P, Steck LK, Hellweg M, Fletcher JB, Baker L (1995) Transient stress at Parkfield, California, produced by the M 7.4 Landers earthquake of June 28, 1992: observations from the UPSAR dense seismograph array. J Geophys Res 100:675–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trifunac MD (1982) A note on rotational components of earthquake motions for incident body waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 1:11–19Google Scholar
  28. Wen KL, Yeh YT (1984) Seismic velocity strucure beneath the SMART-1 array. Bull Inst Earth Sci Acad Sin 4:51–72Google Scholar
  29. Wolf JP, Obernhueber P, Weber B (1983) Response of a nuclear plant on aseismic bearings to horizontally propagating waves. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 11:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zembaty Z (2009a) Rotational seismic code definition in Eurocode 8, Part 6, for slender tower-shaped structures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2B):1483–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zembaty Z (2009b) Tutorial on surface rotation from wave passage effects: stochastic spectral approach. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2B):1040–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zembaty Z, Boffi G (1994) Effect of rotational seismic ground motion on dynamic response of slender towers. Eur Earthq Eng 8:3–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhiman Basu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrew S. Whittaker
    • 2
  • Michael C. Constantinou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at BuffaloState University of New YorkBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations