Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 3317–3338 | Cite as

An improved earthquake catalogue (M ≥ 4.0) for Turkey and its near vicinity (1900–2012)

  • F. Tuba Kadirioğlu
  • Recai F. Kartal
  • Tuğbay Kılıç
  • Doğan Kalafat
  • Tamer Y. Duman
  • Tuba Eroğlu Azak
  • Selim Özalp
  • Ömer Emre
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Many catalogues, agency reports and research articles have been published on seismicity of Turkey and its surrounding since 1950s. Given existing magnitude heterogeneity, erroneous information on epicentral location, event date and time, this past published data however is far from fulfilling the required standards. Paucity of a standardized format in the available catalogues have reinforced the need for a refined and updated catalogue for earthquake related hazard and risk studies. During this study, ~37,000 earthquakes and related parametric data were evaluated by utilizing more than 41 published studies and, an integrated database was prepared in order to analyse all parameters acquired from the catalogues and references for each event. Within the scope of this study, the epicentral locations of M ≥ 5.0 events were firstly reappraised based on the updated Active Fault Map of Turkey. An improved catalogue of 12.674 events for the period 1900–2012 was as a result recompiled for the region between 32–45N° and 23–48E° by analyzing in detail accuracy of all seismological parameters available for each event. The events consist of M ≥ 4.0 are reported in several magnitude scales (e.g. moment magnitude, Mw; surface wave magnitude, MS; body-wave magnitude mb; local magnitude ML and duration magnitude Md) whereas the maximum focal depth reaches up to 225-km. In order to provide homogenous data, the improved catalogue is unified in terms of Mw. Fore-and aftershocks were also removed from the catalogue and completeness analyses were performed both separately for various tectonic sources and as a whole for the study region of interest. Thus, the prepared homogenous and declustered catalogue consisting of 6573 events provides the basis for a reliable input to the seismic hazard assessment studies for Turkey and its surrounding areas.

Keywords

Turkey Instrumental earthquake catalogue Homogeneous catalogue Declustering Catalogue completeness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out as a part of the ‘Seismotectonic Maps of Turkey’ project supported by the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA), Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) and Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institution (KRDAE). We gratefully acknowledge the MTA, AFAD and KRDAE for the support provided. Also we would like to thank guest editor and the reviewers for their comments that help improve the paper.

Supplementary material

10518_2016_64_MOESM1_ESM.xls (7.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (Table 7, XLS 7457 kb)
10518_2016_64_MOESM2_ESM.xls (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (Table 8, XLS 2278 kb)
10518_2016_64_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (467 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (Table 9, XLSX 425 kb)

References

  1. AFAD Earthquake catalogue (2007–present), Prime Ministry, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Earthquake Department, On-line Catalogue, http://www.deprem.gov.tr:1217/tr/ddakatalogu
  2. Alsan E, Tezuçan L, Bath M (1975) An earthquake catalogue for Turkey for the interval 1913–1970. Kandilli Observatory Seismological Department Çengelköy-İstanbul, Turkey and Seismological Institute Box 517, S-751 20 Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambraseys NN, Finkel CF (1987) Seismicity of Turkey and neighbouring regions, 1899–1915. Ann Geophys 5B(6):701–726Google Scholar
  4. Ambraseys NN, Jackson JA (1998) Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys J Int 133:390–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayhan E, Alsan E, Sancaklı N, Üçer SB (1981) Turkey and surrounding earthquake catalogue 1881–1980. Boğaziçi University Publications, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  6. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1982) The empirical prediction of ground motion. Bull Soc Seismol Am 72(6):S43–S60Google Scholar
  7. Das R, Wason HR, Sharma ML (2011) Homogenization of earthquake catalog for Northeast India and adjoining region. Pure Appl Geophys 169(4):725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duman TY, Çan T, Emre Ö, Kadirioğlu FT, Başarır Baştürk N, Kılıç T, Arslan S, Özalp S, Kartal RF, Kalafat D, Karakaya F, Eroğlu Azak T, Özel NM, Ergintav S, Akkar S, Altınok Y, Tekin S, Cingöz A, Kurt Aİ (2016) Seismotectonics database of Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9965-9 Google Scholar
  9. Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewonski AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200–201:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emre Ö, Duman TY, Özalp S, Elmacı H, Olgun Ş, Şaroğlu F (2013) Active Fault Map of Turkey Mineral Research and Exploration General Directorate, Special Issue Series-30, Ankara-TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  11. EMSC-CSEM Earthquake catalogue (2012) European Mediterranean Seismological Center, On-line Bulletin. http://www.emsc-csem.org/Bulletin/
  12. Engdahl van der Hilst and Buland Catalogue (1998) 1960–2008Google Scholar
  13. Eroğlu Azak T, Kalafat D, Şeşetyan K, Demircioğlu MB (2016) A sensitivity analysis on declustering methods using Turkish earthquake catalogue, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Turkish Seismic Hazard Map Special Issue (In review)Google Scholar
  14. Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367Google Scholar
  15. Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2003) An Mw based earthquake catalogue for central, northern and northwestern Europe using a hierarchy of magnitude conversions. J Seismol 7(4):507–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1936) On seismic waves (third paper). Gerlands Beitrage zur Geophysik 47:73–131Google Scholar
  17. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy earthquakes. Ann Geophys 9:1–15Google Scholar
  19. Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ISC Catalogue (2013) International Seismological Centre, On-line Bulletin. Thatcham, UK. http://www.isc.ac.uk
  21. Kadirioğlu FT, Kartal RF (2016) The new empirical magnitude conversion relations using an improved earthquake catalogue for Turkey and its near vicinity (1900–2012). Turk J Earth Sci 25(4):300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalafat D, Güneş Y, Kekovalı K, Kara M, Deniz P, Yılmazer M (2011) A revised and extended earthquake catalogue for Turkey since 1900 (M ≥ 4.0). Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:2981–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulargia F, Gasperini P, Tinti S (1987) A procedure to identify objectively active seismotectonic structures. Bolletino di Geofisica teorica ed applicata 29(114):147–164Google Scholar
  25. NEIC Earthquake catalogue (2012). National Earthquake Information Centre, On-line Bulletin, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/
  26. Page R (1968) Focal depths of aftershocks. J Geophys Res 73(12):3897–3903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res 90:5479–5495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richter CF (1935) An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. B Seismol Soc Am 25(1):1–32Google Scholar
  29. Richter CF (1958) Elementary seismology. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, p 768Google Scholar
  30. Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: Proceedings of the international conference on microzonation, Seattle, USA, 897–910 1972Google Scholar
  31. Storchak DA, Di Giacomo D, Bondár I, Engdahl ER, Harris J, Lee WHK, Villaseñor A, Bormann P (2013) Public release of the ISC–GEM global instrumental earthquake catalogue (1900–2009). Seismol Res Lett 84(5):810–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyse seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72(2):373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Tuba Kadirioğlu
    • 1
  • Recai F. Kartal
    • 1
  • Tuğbay Kılıç
    • 1
  • Doğan Kalafat
    • 2
  • Tamer Y. Duman
    • 3
  • Tuba Eroğlu Azak
    • 4
  • Selim Özalp
    • 5
  • Ömer Emre
    • 3
  1. 1.Earthquake DepartmentAFAD, Disaster and Emergency Management PresidencyÇankayaTurkey
  2. 2.Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research InstitutionsBoğaziçi UniversityÇengelköyTurkey
  3. 3.Fugro Sial Geosciences Consulting and EngineeringÇankayaTurkey
  4. 4.Civil Engineering Department, Engineering FacultyAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  5. 5.General Directorate of Mineral Research and ExplorationÇankayaTurkey

Personalised recommendations