Using the discrete element method to assess the seismic vulnerability of aggregated masonry buildings
- 353 Downloads
The seismic vulnerability of masonry aggregates is assessed with an approach based on the discrete element method. In that purpose, a quasi-static push-over procedure has been developed, in which a load pattern, based on the building first mode of vibration, is applied to the studied structure. Using this approach, the magnitude of the horizontal load to be applied for the building to collapse is obtained after a short computation time, as well as a detailed description of the failure mechanism. These results can be useful, for instance, for identifying the weakness of a structure or for comparing quantitatively the vulnerability of different structures. The beneficial and negative effects on the seismic response of the aggregation are assessed by subjecting isolated and aggregated buildings to both in-plane and transverse loads. As observed by engineers during post-seismic field missions, the buildings at the extremities of the aggregate are more prone to damage, because, contrary to the buildings inside the aggregate, they are not efficiently braced by the neighboring structures.
KeywordsMasonry Aggregate Cluster Seismic vulnerability Discrete-element model DEM Numerical modeling Push-over Collapse mechanism
The results have been achieved in the project PERPETUATE (www.perpetuate.eu), funded by the European Commission in the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), under Grant Agreement No. 244229. We thank John Douglas for proof-reading this article. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this article.
- Alexandris A, Protopapa E, Psycharis I (2004) Collapse mechanisms of masonry buildings derived by the distinct element method. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineeringGoogle Scholar
- Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S, Rossi M (2010) Review of existing models for global response and local mechanisms. PERPETUATE Eur Res FP7 D7:1–64Google Scholar
- Cundall PA (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive, large scale movements in blocky rock systems. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on rock fractures. Nancy, France II-8, pp 1–12Google Scholar
- D’Ayala D, Speranza E (2002) An integrated procedure for the assessment of seismic vulnerability of historic buildings. disp 3(1):3–3Google Scholar
- Dubois F, Jean M (2003) LMGC90 une plateforme de développement dédiée à la modélisation des problèmes d’interaction. In: Actes du sixieme colloque national en calcul des structures, vol 1, pp 111–118Google Scholar
- Galasco A, Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Cattari S (2002) TREMURI program: seismic analyser of 3D masonry buildings. University of GenoaGoogle Scholar
- Lemos JV (1995) Assessment of the ultimate load of a masonry arch using discrete elements. In: Middleton J, Pande GN (eds) Computer methods in structural masonry – 3, Books and Journals International, Swansea, UKGoogle Scholar
- Lemos JV (2001) Modelling the behaviour of a stone masonry arch structure under cyclic loads. Comput Methods Struct Mason 5:101–108Google Scholar
- Rossetto T, Alexander D, Verrucci E, Ioannou I, Borg RC, Melo J, Cahill B, Kongar I (2012) The 20th May 2012 Emilia Romagna Earthquake, EPICentre Field Observation ReportGoogle Scholar
- Tomazevic M (2000) Some aspects of experimental testing of seismic behavior of masonry walls and models of masonry buildings. J Earthq Technol 37(4):101–117Google Scholar