Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 1797–1816 | Cite as

Seismic design, modelling and assessment of self-centering steel frames using post-tensioned connections with web hourglass shape pins

  • Athanasios I. Dimopoulos
  • Theodore L. Karavasilis
  • George Vasdravellis
  • Brian Uy
Original Research Paper

Abstract

A new self-centering steel post-tensioned connection using web hourglass shape pins (WHPs) has been recently developed and experimentally validated. The connection isolates inelastic deformations in WHPs, avoids damage in other connection parts as well as in beams and columns, and eliminates residual drifts. WHPs do not interfere with the composite slab and can be very easily replaced without bolting or welding, and so, the connection enables non-disruptive repair and rapid return to building occupancy in the aftermath of a strong earthquake. This paper presents a simplified nonlinear model for the connection and the associated beams and columns that consists of nonlinear beam-column elements, and hysteretic and contact zero-length spring elements appropriately placed in the beam-column interface. The model was calibrated against experimental results and found to accurately simulate the connection behaviour. A prototype building was selected and designed as a conventional steel moment-resisting frame (MRF) according to Eurocode 8 or as a self-centering steel MRF (SC-MRF) using the connection with WHPs. Seismic analyses results show that the conventional MRF and the SC-MRF have comparable peak storey drifts, and highlight the inherent potential of the SC-MRF to eliminate damage in beams and residual drifts. The paper also shows that repair of damage in the conventional MRF will be costly and disruptive after the design basis earthquake, and, not financially viable after the maximum considered earthquake due to large residual drifts.

Keywords

Self-centering Post-tensioned Seismic design  Steel connection  Steel MRFs 

References

  1. AISC (2005) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  2. Charney FA, Downs WM (2004) Connections in steel structures V. ESSC/AISC Workshop. Amsterdam, June 3–4Google Scholar
  3. Chou CC, Lai YJ (2009) Post-tensioned self-centering moment connections with beam bottom flange energy dissipators. J Constr Steel Res 65(10–11):1931–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chou CC, Chen JH, Chen YC, Tsai KC (2006) Evaluating performance of post-tensioned steel connections with strands and reduced flange plates. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9):1167–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chou CC, Tsai KC, Yang WC (2009) Self-centering steel connections with steel bars and a discontinuous composite slab. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A, Uang CM, Folz B (2002) Posttensioned energy dissipating connections for moment-resisting steel frames. J Struct Eng 128(9):1111–1120Google Scholar
  7. EC1(2009) Eurocode 1: actions on structures-Part 1-1: general actions-densities, self-weight and imposed loadsGoogle Scholar
  8. EC8 (2009) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildingsGoogle Scholar
  9. EC3 (2010) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures- Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildingsGoogle Scholar
  10. Garlock M, Ricles JM, Sause R (2005) Experimental studies of full-scale posttensioned steel connections. J Struct Eng 131(3):438–448Google Scholar
  11. Garlock M, Sause R, Ricles JM (2007) Behavior and design of posttensioned steel frame systems. J Struct Eng 133(3):389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karavasilis TL, Seo CY (2011) Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly-damped self-centering and conventional systems. Eng Struct 33(8):2248–2258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karavasilis TL, Ricles JM, Sause R, Chen C (2011) Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of steel MRFs with compressed elastomer dampers using large-scale real-time hybrid simulation. Eng Struct 33(6):1859–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karavasilis TL, Kerawala S, Hale E (2012) Model for hysteretic behaviour of steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 70: 358–367Google Scholar
  15. Kim HJ, Christopoulos C (2008a) Friction damped posttensioned self-centering steel moment-resisting frames. J Struct Eng 134(11):1768–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim HJ, Christopoulos C (2008b) Seismic design procedure and seismic response of post-tensioned self-centering steel frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(3):355–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kobori T, Miura Y, Fukuzawa E, Yamada T, Arita T, Takenaka Y, Miyagawa N, Tanaka N, Fukumoto T (1992) Development and application of hysteresis steel dampers. Earthquake engineering, tenth world conference, Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott M, Fenves G (2006) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). User command language manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. Mc Cormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M, Nakashima M (2008) Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. In: 14th WCEE, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  20. Ricles J, Sause R, Garlock M, Zhao C (2001) Posttensioned seismic-resistant connections for steel frames. J Struct Eng 127(2):113–121Google Scholar
  21. Ricles J, Sause R, Peng SW, Lu LW (2002) Experimental evaluation of earthquake resistant posttensioned steel connections. J Struct Eng 128(7):850–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rojas P, Ricles JM, Sause R (2004) Seismic performance of post-tensioned steel moment resisting frames with friction devices. J Struct Eng 131(4):529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Somerville P (1997) Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project, Report No. SAC/DB-97/04, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsai KC, Chou CC, Lin CL, Chen PC, Jhang SJ (2008) Seismic self-centering steel beam-to-column moment connections using bolted friction devices. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:627–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vasdravellis G, Karavasilis TL, Uy B (2012) Large-scale experimental validation of steel post-tensioned connections with web hourglass pins. J Struct Eng (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Vasdravellis G, Karavasilis TL, Uy B (2013) Finite element models and cyclic behaviour of self-centering steel post-tensioned connections with web hourglass pins. Eng Struct (in press)Google Scholar
  27. Whittle J, Williams MS, Karavasilis TL, Blakeborough T (2012) A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design. J Earthq Eng 16:540–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolski M, Ricles JM, Sause R (2009) Experimental study of a self-centering beam-column connection with bottom flange friction device. J Struct Eng 135(5):479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Athanasios I. Dimopoulos
    • 1
  • Theodore L. Karavasilis
    • 1
  • George Vasdravellis
    • 2
  • Brian Uy
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Institute for Infrastructure EngineeringUniversity of Western SydneyPenrith, SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations