Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 241–254 | Cite as

A note on the strong ground motion recorded during the Mw 6.8 earthquake in Myanmar on 24 March 2011

Original Research Paper

Abstract

This study aims to investigate a Mw 6.8 earthquake that occurred in Myanmar on 24 March 2011. The epicenter of this earthquake struck very close to the Tarlay town which is located near the border of Myanmar, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR), and Thailand. In addition, this shallow left-lateral strike-slip earthquake occurred on Nam Ma fault which is previously identified as an active fault. Based on instrumental earthquake catalogue, Nam Ma fault did not produce any earthquake greater than magnitude 6 for at least 100 years. So the 24 March 2011 earthquake is essentially filling the gap of relatively short instrumental earthquake catalogue in this region. The strong ground motion from this event has been recorded in Thailand with the highest peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.20 g at 28 km distance at Mae Sai town. Comparison between observed strong motion and global empirical equation had been provided. Over the distance range for which the model is applicable, they are in fair agreement. On the other hand, at long distance, the large positive and negative residuals suggest that a change in slope in the attenuation is not reflected in these relations. Lastly a seismological aspect of strong ground motion at Mae Sai had been given.

Keywords

Myanmar earthquake Strong ground motion Nam Ma fault 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson NA (2000) Near-fault ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. In: Proceedings of U.S.–Japan workshop on the effects of near-field earthquake shaking. San Francisco, California, 20–21 March 2000Google Scholar
  2. Akkar S, Özen Ö (2005) Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(13): 1551–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AIT: (1980) Asian Institute of Technology, “Investigation of Land Subsidence Caused by Deep Well Pumping in the Bangkok Area, Phase II”. AIT research report submitted to the National Environmental Board, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilham R (2004) Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history. Ann Geophys 47(2): 839–858Google Scholar
  5. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24: 99–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchon M, Bouin M-P, Karabulut H, Toksoz MN, Dietrich M, Rosakis AJ (2001) How fast is rupture during an earthquake? New insights from the 1999 Turkey earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 28: 2723–2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DPT 1302 (2009) Seismic resistant design of buildings and structures. Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, Ministry of Interior, p 125 (in Thai)Google Scholar
  8. Fenton CH, Charusiri P, Wood SH (2003) Recent paleoseismic investigations in northern and western Thailand. Ann Geophys 46: 957–981Google Scholar
  9. Giardini D, Grunthal G, Shedlock K, Zheng P (1999) The GSHAP global seismic hazard map. Annali di Geofisica 42: 1225–1230Google Scholar
  10. Kagawa T, Irikura K, Somerville PG (2004) Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between the surface and buried rupture earthquakes. Earth Planets Space 56: 3–14Google Scholar
  11. Kawase H, Aki K (1990) Topography effect at the critical SV-wave incidence: possible explanation of damage pattern by the Whittier Narrows, California, earthquake of 1 October 1987. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80: 1–22Google Scholar
  12. Knopoff L (1958) Energy release in earthquakes. Geophys J 1: 44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lacassin R, Replumaz A, Hervé Leloup P (1998) Hairpin river loops and slip-sense inversion on southeast. Asian Strike Slip Faults Geol 26(8): 703–706Google Scholar
  14. Lin J, Stein RS (2004) Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes, and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults. J Geophys Res 109: B02303. doi:10.1029/2003JB002607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3): 1099–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oglesby DD, Archuleta RJ (1997) A faulting model for the 1992 Petrolia earthquake: can extreme ground acceleration be a source effect?. J Geophys Res 102: 11877–11897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Okada Y (1992) Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82(2): 1018–1040Google Scholar
  18. Ornthammarath T, Warnitchai P, Worakanchana K, Zaman S, Sigbjörnsson R, Lai CG (2011) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Thailand. Bull Earthquake Eng 9(2): 367–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palasri C, Ruangrassamee A (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps of Thailand. J Earthq Tsunami 4(4): 369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parsons T, Stein RS, Simpson RW, Reasenberg PA (1999) Stress sensitivity of fault seismicity; a comparison between limited-offset oblique and major strike-slip faults. J Geophys Res 104(B9): 20183–20202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poovarodom N, Pitakwong K (2010) Microtremor observations for site characterization in Thailand. In: Proceeding of the 3rd Asia conference on earthquake engineering (ACEE2010):1–3 December 2010Google Scholar
  22. Radiguet M, Cotton F, Manighetti I, Campillo M, Douglas J (2009) Dependency of near-field ground motions on the structural maturity of the ruptured faults. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2572–2581. doi:10.1785/0120080340
  23. Ruangrassamee A, Ornthammarath T, Lukkunaprasit P (2012) Damage due to 24 March 2011 M6.8 Tarlay earthquake in Northern Thailand. In: Proceeding of the 15th world conference in earthquake engineering (15WCEE):Lisbon, Portugal, September 24–28, 2012Google Scholar
  24. Rupakhety R, Halldorsson B, Sigbjornsson R (2010) Estimating coseismic deformations from near source strong motion records: methods and case studies. Bull Earthquake Eng 8(4): 787–811. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9167-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sadigh K, Chang C-Y, Egan JA, Makdisi FI, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen Z-K, Lu J, Wang M, Burgmann RC (2005) Contemporary crustal deformation around the southeast borderland of the Tibetan Plateau. J Geophys Res 110: B11409. doi:10.1029/2004JB003421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sigurdsson SU, Rupakhety R, Sigbjornsson R (2011) Adjustments for baseline shifts in far-fault strong-motion data: an alternative scheme to high-pass filtering. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(12): 1703–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein S, Wysession M (2003) An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure. Blackwell, ISBN 0-86542-078-5Google Scholar
  29. Toda S, Stein RS (2002) Response of the San Andreas fault to the 1983 Coalinga-Nuñez earthquakes: an application of interaction-based probabilities for Parkfield. J Geophys Res 107. doi:10.1029/2001JB000172
  30. Uttamo W, Elders CF, Nicols GJ (2003) Relationships between Cenozoic strike-slip faulting and basin opening in northern Thailand, in Intraplate Strike-Slip Deformation Belts, edited by F. Storti et al. Geol Soc Spec Publ 210: 89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthq Spectra 15(3): 557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupturewidth, and surface displacements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4): 974–1002Google Scholar
  33. Worden CB, Gerstenberger MC, Rhoades DA, Wald DJ (2012) Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified mercalli intensity in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(1): 204–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Regional Integrated Multi-Hazard Early Warning System (RIMES)PathumthaniThailand
  2. 2.Asian Institute of TechnologyPathumthaniThailand

Personalised recommendations