Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 895–911 | Cite as

Analysis of non-stationary structural systems by using a band-variable filter

  • Rocco Ditommaso
  • Marco Mucciarelli
  • Felice Carlo Ponzo
Original Research Paper


One of the main tools used to study the dynamic response of structural systems is certainly the Fourier Transform. This tool is very useful and reliable to investigating the response of a stationary system, i.e. a generic system that does not changes its characteristics over time. Conversely, the Fourier Transform is no longer reliable if the main goal is to study the evolution of the dynamic response of a system whose features rapidly vary with time. To this regard, several mathematical tools were developed to analyze time-variable dynamic responses. Soil and buildings, subject to transient forcing such as an earthquake, may change their characteristics over time with the initiation of nonlinear phenomena. This paper proposes a new methodology to approach the study of non-stationary response of soil and buildings: a band-variable filter based on S-Transform. In fact, with the possibility of changing the bandwidth of each filtering window over time, it becomes possible to extract from a generic record only the response of the system focusing on the variation of individual modes of vibration. Practically, it is possible to extract from a generic non-stationary signal only the phase of interest. The paper starts from examples and applications on synthetic signals, then examines possible applications to the study of the non-stationary response of soil and buildings. The last application focuses on the possibility to evaluate the mode shapes over time for both numerical and scaled model subjected to strong motion inputs.


Non-parametric dynamic identification Structural health monitoring Nonlinear systems Non-stationary systems S-Transform Strong motion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Addison PS (2002) The illustrated wavelet transform handbook: introductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and fincne. IOP Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Aguirre J, Irikura K (1997) Nonlinearity, liquefaction, and velocity variation of soft soil layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(5): 1244–1258Google Scholar
  3. Askari R, Siahkoohi HR (2007) Ground roll attenuation using the S and x-f-k transforms. Geophys Prospect 55: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford SC, Yang J, Heaton T (2006) Variations in the dynamic properties of structures: the Wigner-Ville distribution. In: Proceedings of the 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering. San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra AK (1995) Dynamic of structures— theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. Clough R, Penzien J (2003) Dynamics of structures, 3rd edn. Computers & Structures, IncGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen L (1989) Time-frequency distributions-a review. Proc IEEE 77(7).Google Scholar
  8. Computers & Structures, Inc., SAP2000—integrated software for structural analysis & design, technical reference manual (
  9. Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelet. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. ISBN 0898712742Google Scholar
  10. Dehghani MJ (2009). Comparison of S-transform and wavelet transform in power quality analysis. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 50.Google Scholar
  11. Ditommaso R, Mucciarelli M, Gallipoli MR, Ponzo FC (2010a) Effect of a single vibrating building on free-field ground motion: numerical and experimental evidences. Bull Earthquake Eng 8(3): 693–703 doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9134-5 Google Scholar
  12. Ditommaso R, Parolai S, Mucciarelli M, Eggert S, Sobiesiak M, Zschau J (2010b) Monitoring the response and the back-radiated energy of a building subjected to ambient vibration and impulsive action: the Falkenhof Tower (Potsdam, Germany). Bull Earthquake Eng 8(3): 705–722 doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9151-4
  13. Ditommaso R, Mucciarelli M, Ponzo FC (2010c) S-Transform based filter applied to the analysis of non-linear dynamic behaviour of soil and buildings. In: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on earthquake engineering, volume. Ohrid, August 30–September 03Google Scholar
  14. Dolce M, Cardone D, Di Cesare A, Moroni C, Nicoletti M, Ponzo FC, Nigro D (2005) Dynamic tests on a 1:4 scaled R/C existing building: comparison of several isolation systems. 9th AssisiGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolce M, Cardone D, Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Nigro D, Ponzo FC, Santarsiero G (2006) Shape memory alloys braces. In: Seismic upgrading of r.c. buildings by advanced techniques-the ILVA-IDEM research project. Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher (Italy), Monza. Federico Mazzolani Coordinator & ed, pp 325–359. ISBN: 88-7699-038-0Google Scholar
  16. Fotsch D, Ewins DJ (2000) Applications of MAC in the frequency domain (2000). In: International Modal Analysis Conference. IMAC, pp 1225–1231Google Scholar
  17. Gabor D (1946) Theory of communications. J Inst Elect Eng 93: 429–457Google Scholar
  18. Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Ponzo F, Dolce M, D’Alema E, Maistrello M (2006) Buildings as a seismic source: analysis of a release test at Bagnoli, Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6): 2457–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guan H, Karbhari VM, Sikorski CS (2005) Time-domain output only modal parameter extraction and its application. In: Proceedings of the 1st international operational modal analysis conference, Copenhagen, pp 577–584Google Scholar
  20. Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Mucciarelli M, Masi A, Gallipoli MR, Harabaglia P, Vona M, Ponzo F, Dolce M (2004) Analysis of RC building dynamic response and soil-building resonance based on data recorded during a damaging earthquake (Molise, Italy, 2002). Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5): 1943–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandey AK, Biswas M, Samman MM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib 145(2): 321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parolai S (2009) Denoising of seismograms using the S transform. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(1): 226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinnegar CR, Eaton DE (2003) Application of the S-Transform to prestack noise attenuation filtering. J Geophys Res 108(B9): 2422. doi: 10.1029/2002JB00002258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ponzo FC, Ditommaso R, Auletta G, Mossucca A (2010) A fast method for structural health monitoring of Italian strategic reinforced concrete buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 8(6):1421–1434 doi: 10.1007/s10518-010-9194-6 Google Scholar
  26. Rainieri C, Fabroccino G (2010) Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(3): 678–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sćhimmel M, Gallart J (2005). The inverse S transform with windows of arbitrary and varying shape. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 53:4417–4422Google Scholar
  28. Simon C, Ventosa S, Schimmel M, Heldring A, Dañobeitia JJ, Gallart J, Manuel A (2007) The S-Transform and its inverses: side effects of discretizing and filtering. IEEE Trans Signal Process 55: 4928–4937. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.897893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Snieder R, Safak E (2006) Extracting the building response using seismic interferometry: theory and application to the Millikan Library in Pasadena, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96: 586–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stockwell RG, Mansinha L, Lowe RP (1996) Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44: 998–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ville J (1948) Theorie et applications de la notion de signal analytique. Cables et Transm. 2A:61Google Scholar
  32. Wigner E (1932) On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys Rev 40: 749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Young RK (1993) Wavelet theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rocco Ditommaso
    • 1
  • Marco Mucciarelli
    • 1
  • Felice Carlo Ponzo
    • 1
  1. 1.DiSGG, University of BasilicataPotenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations