Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database
- 783 Downloads
We present a set of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) derived for the geometrical mean of the horizontal components and the vertical, considering the latest release of the strong motion database for Italy. The regressions are performed over the magnitude range 4–6.9 and considering distances up to 200 km. The equations are derived for peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV) and 5%-damped spectral acceleration at periods between 0.04 and 2 s. The total standard deviation (sigma) varies between 0.34 and 0.38 log10 unit, confirming the large variability of ground shaking parameters when regional data sets containing small to moderate magnitude events (M < 6) are used. The between-stations variability provides the largest values for periods shorter than 0.2 s while, for longer periods, the between-events and between-stations distributions of error provide similar contribution to the total variability.
KeywordsGround motion prediction equations Strong motion Italy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abrahamson NA, Youngs RR (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82: 505–510Google Scholar
- Bindi D, Luzi L, Pacor F, Franceschina G, Castro RR (2006) Ground-motion prediction from empirical attenuation relationships versus recorded data: the case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marches, Central Italy, strong motion data set. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3): 984–1002. doi: 10.1785/0120050102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2003) prEN 1998-1- Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Draft No 6, Doc CEN/TC250/SC8/N335, January 2003, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Douglas J (2007) On the regional dependence of earthquake response spectra: ISET. J Earthq Technol 44(1): 471–499Google Scholar
- Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, ISBN 978-0412042317, 456 ppGoogle Scholar
- Foti S, Parolai S, Bergamo P, Di Giulio G, Maraschini M, Milana G, Picozzi M, Puglia R (2011) Surface wave surveys for seismic site characterization of accelerometric stations in ITACA. Bull Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9306-y
- Menke W (1989) Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. In: Dmowska R, Holton JR (Eds) Int Geophys Series, vol 45. Academic Press, New York, 289 ppGoogle Scholar
- Pacor F, Paolucci R, Ameri G, Massa M, Puglia R (2011) Italian strong motion records in ITACA: overview and record processing, Bull Earth Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9295-x
- Paolucci R, Pacor F, Puglia R, Ameri G, Cauzzi C, Massa M (2011) Record processing in ITACA, the new Italian strong-motion database. In: Akkar S, Gulkan P, Van Eck T (eds) Earthquake data in engineering seismology. Predictive models, data management and networks. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering series, Vol. 14, Chapter 8. Springer, pp 99–113Google Scholar
- Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of non-stationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 337–352Google Scholar
- Zoback ML (1992) First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the world stress map project. J Geophys Res 97(B8): 11,703–11,728Google Scholar