How to model rockburst seismic loads for civil engineering purposes?

Open Access
Original Research Paper


Usually rockbursts from underground mining induce minor quakes of MM intensity up to V. Sometimes however the surface tremors reach level of MM epicentral intensity I 0 = VI to VIII. Since a fast industrial development often takes place in the mining areas then some seismic design rules for new buildings are needed. The main obstacle is then lack of respective design response spectrum and an unclear definition of the level of design acceleration to apply. Particularly the latter one is difficult to overcome because the rockburst ground motion records differ from natural earthquakes when it comes to their spectral properties as well as return periods. This paper presents a method how to rationally define the design acceleration so that a seismic code, e,g, Eurocode 8, can be applied in practical design procedures in the mining areas.


Mine tremors Rockbursts Ground motion Response spectra Seismic codes 


Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen RI (ed) Seismic design of nuclear power plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Chopra AK (1995) Dynamics of structures with application to seismic engineering. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. DIN 41-50 (1975), Vornorm, September 1975 Erschütterungen im BauwesenGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowding CH (1996) Construction vibrations. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  5. EN 1998-1 (2005), Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistanceGoogle Scholar
  6. García-Mayordomo J, Faccioli E, Paolucci R (2004) Comparative study of the seismic hazard assessments in European National seismic codes. Bull Earthquake Eng 2(1): 71–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibowicz SJ, Kijko A (1994) An introduction to mining seismology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. Hadjian AH (1993) The Spitak, Armenia earthquake of 7 December 1988—why so much destruction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 12: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnston JC (1992) Rockbursts from a global perspective. In: Knoll P (ed) Induced seismicity. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield, pp 63–78Google Scholar
  10. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2007) Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27: 116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kijko A, Lasocki S, Graham G (2001) Non-parametric seismic hazard in mines. Pure Appl Geophys 158: 1655–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knoll, P (ed) (1992) Induced seismicity. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu Y, Hao H, Ma G, Zhou Y (2002) Local-mode resonance and its structural effects under horizontal ground shock excitations. J Sound Vib 254(1): 51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mutke G, Muszyński L, Lurka A, Siata R, Logiewa H, Musiał M, Byrczek B (2000) Assesment of correctness of measurements of ground vibrations for ZG Rudna mine rockbursts (in Polish). GIG report number 42162719-123, April 2000Google Scholar
  15. Paolucci R, Spinelli D (2006) Ground motion induced by train passage. J Eng Mech ASCE 132: 201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pomeroy PW, Best WJ, McEvilly (1982) Test Ban Treaty verification with regional data—a review. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72B: 89–129Google Scholar
  17. Siskind DE, Stagg MS, Kopp JW, Dowding CH (1980) Structure response and damage produced by ground vibrations from surface mine blasting. Report of Investigation RI 8507, US Bureau of MinesGoogle Scholar
  18. Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975a) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(1): 139–162Google Scholar
  19. Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975b) A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65: 581–626Google Scholar
  20. Van Eck T, Goutbeek F, Haak H, Dost B (2006) Seismic hazard due to small-magnitude, shallow-source, induced earthquakes in The Netherlands. Eng Geol 87: 105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zembaty Z (2004) Rockburst induced ground motion—a comparative study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24: 11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zmbaty Z (2006) Estimation of seismic intensity of the strong rockburst of May 21st 2006 and conclusions for the future, (in Polish) report BE-14/06, Opole University of Technology, pp 1–74Google Scholar
  23. Zembaty Z, Kokot S (2007) Determination of equivalent inertia forces of the kinematic excitations to design new buildings in the LGOM Copper Basin (in Polish) report BU-14/07, for “KGHM CUPRUM”, Opole University of Technology, pp 1–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Opole University of TechnologyOpolePoland

Personalised recommendations