How to model rockburst seismic loads for civil engineering purposes?
- 972 Downloads
Usually rockbursts from underground mining induce minor quakes of MM intensity up to V. Sometimes however the surface tremors reach level of MM epicentral intensity I 0 = VI to VIII. Since a fast industrial development often takes place in the mining areas then some seismic design rules for new buildings are needed. The main obstacle is then lack of respective design response spectrum and an unclear definition of the level of design acceleration to apply. Particularly the latter one is difficult to overcome because the rockburst ground motion records differ from natural earthquakes when it comes to their spectral properties as well as return periods. This paper presents a method how to rationally define the design acceleration so that a seismic code, e,g, Eurocode 8, can be applied in practical design procedures in the mining areas.
KeywordsMine tremors Rockbursts Ground motion Response spectra Seismic codes
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen RI (ed) Seismic design of nuclear power plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Chopra AK (1995) Dynamics of structures with application to seismic engineering. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- DIN 41-50 (1975), Vornorm, September 1975 Erschütterungen im BauwesenGoogle Scholar
- Dowding CH (1996) Construction vibrations. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- EN 1998-1 (2005), Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistanceGoogle Scholar
- Gibowicz SJ, Kijko A (1994) An introduction to mining seismology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Johnston JC (1992) Rockbursts from a global perspective. In: Knoll P (ed) Induced seismicity. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield, pp 63–78Google Scholar
- Knoll, P (ed) (1992) Induced seismicity. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
- Mutke G, Muszyński L, Lurka A, Siata R, Logiewa H, Musiał M, Byrczek B (2000) Assesment of correctness of measurements of ground vibrations for ZG Rudna mine rockbursts (in Polish). GIG report number 42162719-123, April 2000Google Scholar
- Pomeroy PW, Best WJ, McEvilly (1982) Test Ban Treaty verification with regional data—a review. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72B: 89–129Google Scholar
- Siskind DE, Stagg MS, Kopp JW, Dowding CH (1980) Structure response and damage produced by ground vibrations from surface mine blasting. Report of Investigation RI 8507, US Bureau of MinesGoogle Scholar
- Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975a) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(1): 139–162Google Scholar
- Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975b) A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65: 581–626Google Scholar
- Zmbaty Z (2006) Estimation of seismic intensity of the strong rockburst of May 21st 2006 and conclusions for the future, (in Polish) report BE-14/06, Opole University of Technology, pp 1–74Google Scholar
- Zembaty Z, Kokot S (2007) Determination of equivalent inertia forces of the kinematic excitations to design new buildings in the LGOM Copper Basin (in Polish) report BU-14/07, for “KGHM CUPRUM”, Opole University of Technology, pp 1–50Google Scholar