Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 105–138 | Cite as

Emergency actions and investigations on cultural heritage after the L’Aquila earthquake: the case of the Spanish Fortress

  • L. Binda
  • C. Modena
  • F. Casarin
  • F. LorenzoniEmail author
  • L. Cantini
  • S. Munda
Original Research Paper

Abstract

The earthquake occurred on the 6th of April 2009 in the Abruzzo Region of Italy, seriously hit the Cultural Heritage (C.H.) patrimony with major destructive effects on L’Aquila, a city of 70,000 inhabitants with the size and the historical and strategic importance of the Region capital. The emergency activities to protect the C.H. have been developed on two parallel levels: (1) survey and assessment of damages, (2) implementation of temporary safety measures. The organization of the emergency actions was managed by a centralized structure, the so called Function 15 “Protection of Cultural Heritage”, that coordinated the surveys of protected buildings and the design and implementation of temporary safety measures. This allowed the cooperation among different involved subjects (Ministry of Cultural Heritage officers, experts on structural engineering, architects and historians from Universities and private offices and fire brigade teams). The first level of the operating process was carried out on site by expert teams filling up dedicated survey forms for churches and palaces, developed by the Civil Protection Group GLABEC (a Working group for Cultural Heritage); the forms were based on the standardization of damage survey allowing for its immediate interpretation. The second level was based on the past experience in the field of temporary safety measures; the idea was to provide a technical and scientific support in order to assist the work of fire brigade, highly experienced professionals in the “emergency” field. After the first emergency phase the damages of the most important buildings were more carefully investigated and the possible damage progression constantly monitored. The paper presents the case of the Spanish Fortress in L’Aquila, severely damaged by the earthquake; the description concerns the definition of the damages and the interpretation of the activated collapse mechanisms. Finally the design of the provisional strengthening interventions and the on site diagnostic investigations are presented.

Keywords

Earthquake damages Emergency management Damage survey Provisional structures On site non destructive investigation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AA. VV. (2007) Beni Culturali in Umbria: dall’emergenza sismica alla ricostruzione. Commissario Delegato per i Beni Culturali, Ufficio del Vice Commissario, BetaGamma EdGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellizzi M, Colozza R, Dolce M (2001) Le opere provvisionali nell’emergenza sismica. Atti del X Convegno ANIDIS “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Potenza-Matera, 9–13 Settembre 2001Google Scholar
  3. Binda L, Gambarotta L, Lagomarsino S, Modena C (1999) A multilevel approach to the damage assessment and seismic improvement of masonry buildings in Italy. In: Bernardini A Seismic damage to masonry buildings. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Binda L, Saisi A, Zanzi L (2003) Sonic tomography and flat jack tests as complementary investigation procedures for the stone pillars of the temple of S.Nicolo’ L’Arena (Italy). NDT&E Int J 36: 215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borri A, Avorio A, Corradi M (2002) Ricerche per la ricostruzione—Iniziative di carattere tecnico e scientifico a supporto della ricostruzione. DEI Tipografia del Genio Civile, RomaGoogle Scholar
  6. Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: Proceedings of 18th international modal analysis conference, San Antonio, TX, 7–10 Feb 2000Google Scholar
  7. Calderini C, Lagomarsino S, Podestà S, Lemme A (2004) La messa in sicurezza degli edifici monumentali. XI Convegno ANIDIS “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Genova 25–29 Gennaio 2004Google Scholar
  8. Casarin F, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR, Modena C (2007) Evaluation of the structural behavior of historic masonry buildings by using sonic pulse velocity method. STREMAH 2007—tenth international conference on structural studies, repairs and maintenance of her, Prague, 4–6 July 2007Google Scholar
  9. Casarin F, Valluzzi MR, da Porto F, Modena C (2008) Structural monitoring for the evaluation of the dynamic response of historical monuments, RILEM symposium on on site assessment of concrete, masonry and timber structures—SACoMaTiS 2008. In: Binda L, di Prisco M, Felicetti R (eds) RILEM Publications SARL, pp 787–796 (ISBN 978-2-35158-061-5)Google Scholar
  10. Circolare 2 Febbraio (2009) n. 617 C.S.LL.PP. Instructions for the application of the “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”Google Scholar
  11. Costa CQM (2009) Seismic vulnerabilty of historical structures. Damage state of the Abruzzo churches, in the sequence of the 2009 earthquake. MSc thesis, Erasmus Mundus advanced master in structural analysis of monuments and historical constructions, University of PadovaGoogle Scholar
  12. da Porto F, Valluzzi MR, Modena C (2003) Use of sonic tomography for the diagnosis and the control of intervention in historic masonry buildings. International symposium non-destructive testing in civil engineering NDT-CE, 16–19 Sep 2003, pp CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  13. Doglioni F, Moretti A, Petrini V (1994) Le chiese e il terremoto. LINT Ed TriesteGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolce M, Liberatore D, Moroni C, Perillo G, Spera G, Cacosso A (2002) OPUS: Manuale delle Opere Provvisionali Urgenti Post-Sisma. (http://postterremoto.altervista.org/index.php)
  15. D.P.C.M. (2006) (G.U. 7.3.2006, n.55), damage survey to cultural heritage buildings, 23 Feb 2006Google Scholar
  16. Ewins DJ (2000) Modal testing, theory, practice and application, 2nd edn. Research Studies Press LTD Baldock, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaudini G, Modena C, Casarin F, Bettio C, Lucchin F (2008) Monitoring and strengthening interventions on the stone tomb of Cansignorio della Scala, Verona, Italy, 6th international seminar on structural analysis of historical constructions, Bath, UK, 2–4 July 2008Google Scholar
  18. Giuffrè A (1991) Letture sulla meccanica delle murature storiche. Kappa, RomaGoogle Scholar
  19. Guidelines for evaluation and mitigation of seismic risk to cultural heritage with reference to technical constructions regulation. Ministry for Cultural Heritage and Activities. General Direction of Architectural Heritage and Landscape—Department of Civil Protection Agency, Italy, July 2006Google Scholar
  20. ICOMOS—International Scientific Committee for Analysis and Restoration of Structures of Architectural Heritage (2005) Recommendations for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritageGoogle Scholar
  21. Lagomarsino S, Maggiolo L, Podestà S (2001) Vulnerabilità sismica delle chiese: proposta di una metodologia integrata per il rilievo, la prevenzione ed il rilievo del danno in emergenza. Atti del X Convegno ANIDIS “L’ingegneria sismica in Italia”, Potenza-Matera, 9–13 Settembre 2001Google Scholar
  22. Legislative Decree No. 81 dated 9 April 2008, on health and safety at workGoogle Scholar
  23. Modena C, Pineschi F, Valluzzi MR (2000) Valutazione della vulnerabilità sismica di alcune classi di strutture esistenti. Sviluppo e valutazione di metodi di rinforzo. C.N.R.—G.N.D.T., RomaGoogle Scholar
  24. Modena C, Franchetti P, Zonta D, Menga R, Pizzigalli E, Ravasio F, Muti M, Meloni R, Bordone G (2001) Static and dynamic analyses of Maniace Castle in Siracusa-Sicily. In: Proceedings of 3rd international seminar on structural analysis of historical constructions, Guimarães, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  25. Modena C, Valluzzi MR, da Porto F, Casarin F, Munari M, Mazzon N, Panizza M (2008) Assessment and improvement of the seismic safety of historic constructions: research and applications in Italy. In: Proceedings of the I Congreso Iberoamericano sobre Construcciones Históricas y Estructuras de Mampostería, Bucaramanga, CO, 30 July to 1 Aug 2008Google Scholar
  26. Modello B-DP PCM-DPC MiBAC (2006) Scheda per il rilievo del danno ai beni culturali—Palazzi. Source: www.protezionecivile.it
  27. NCP—Nucleo di Coordinamento per le Opere Provvisionali (2009) Vademecum STOP: Schede tecniche delle opere provvisionali per la messa in sicurezza post-sisma da parte dei Vigili del Fuoco—versione 2.2Google Scholar
  28. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni—Ministerial Decree 14 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  29. SVS, ARTeMIS Extractor (2006) Release 4.0, structural vibration solutions A/S, Aalborg East, DenmarkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Binda
    • 1
  • C. Modena
    • 2
  • F. Casarin
    • 2
  • F. Lorenzoni
    • 2
    Email author
  • L. Cantini
    • 1
  • S. Munda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural Engineering (DIS)Politecnico of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Structural and Transportation Engineering (DCT)University of PadovaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations