Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 395–409 | Cite as

High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records

  • John DouglasEmail author
  • David M. Boore
Original Research Paper


The influence of noise in strong-motion records is most problematic at low and high frequencies where the signal to noise ratio is commonly low compared to that in the mid-spectrum. The impact of low-frequency noise (<1 Hz) on strong-motion intensity parameters such as ground velocities, displacements and response spectral ordinates can be dramatic and consequentially it has become standard practice to low-cut (high-pass) filter strong-motion data with corner frequencies often chosen based on the shape of Fourier amplitude spectra and the signal-to-noise ratio. It has been shown that response spectral ordinates should not be used beyond some fraction of the corner period (reciprocal of the corner frequency) of the low-cut filter. This article examines the effect of high-frequency noise (>5 Hz) on computed pseudo-absolute response spectral accelerations (PSAs). In contrast to the case of low-frequency noise our analysis shows that filtering to remove high-frequency noise is only necessary in certain situations and that PSAs can often be used up to 100 Hz even if much lower high-cut corner frequencies are required to remove the noise. This apparent contradiction can be explained by the fact that PSAs are often controlled by ground accelerations associated with much lower frequencies than the natural frequency of the oscillator because path and site attenuation (often modelled by Q and κ, respectively) have removed the highest frequencies. We demonstrate that if high-cut filters are to be used, then their corner frequencies should be selected on an individual basis, as has been done in a few recent studies.


Strong-motion data Ground-motion prediction equations Ground-motion models Filtering Response spectra Stochastic method κ 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 94–127Google Scholar
  2. Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9): 1145–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4): 371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1): 1–53. doi: 10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JG, Hough SE (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5): 1969–1993Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6): 2181–2205. doi: 10.1785/0120050245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2010) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA). Bull Earthq Eng doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9130-9 (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS (1999) Displacement spectra for seismic design. J Earthq Eng 3(1): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boore DM (2001) Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5): 1199–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boore DM (2003a) Analog-to-digital conversion as a source of drifts in displacements derived from digital recordings of ground acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(5): 2017–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boore DM (2003b) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3–4): 635–676. doi: 10.1007/PL00012553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boore DM (2004) Long-period ground motions from digital acceleration recordings: a new era in engineering seismology. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on future directions in instrumentation for strong motion and engineering seismology. Kluwer, Kusadasi, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  13. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spect 24(1): 99–138. doi: 10.1193/1.2830434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(2): 93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boore DM, Campbell KW, Atkinson GM (2010) Determination of stress parameters for eight well-recorded earthquakes in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4): 1632–1645. doi: 10.1785/0120090328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bragato PL (2004) Regression analysis with truncated samples and its application to ground-motion attenuation studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4): 1369–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 154–179Google Scholar
  18. Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W (2008) NGA project strong-motion database. Earthq Spect 24(1): 23–44. doi: 10.1193/1.2894831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Converse AM, Brady AG (1992) BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software, version 1.0. Open-File Report 92-296A, US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  20. Danciu L, Tselentis GA (2007) Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1B): 162–183. doi: 10.1785/0120040087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darragh B, Silva W, Gregor N (2004) Strong motion record processing procedures for the PEER center. In: Proceedings of COSMOS workshop on strong-motion record processing. Richmond, California, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  22. Douglas J (2003a) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61(1–2): 43–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Douglas J (2003b) What is a poor quality strong-motion record?. Bull Earthq Eng 1(1): 141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(9): 979–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Idriss IM (2007) Empirical model for estimating the average horizontal values of pseudo-absolute spectral accelerations generated by crustal earthquakes, volume 1 (sites with v s30 = 450 to 900 m/s). Interim report issued for USGS reviewGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson RA (1973) An earthquake spectrum prediction technique. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(4): 1255–1274Google Scholar
  27. Jousset P, Douglas J (2007) Long-period earthquake ground displacements recorded on Guadeloupe (French Antilles). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(7): 949–963. doi: 10.1002/eqe.666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1982) Prediction of earthquake response spectra. Open-File Report 82-977, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  29. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering & soil dynamics II, geotechnical division, ASCE, pp 43–102Google Scholar
  30. Paolucci R, Rovelli A, Faccioli E, Cauzzi C, Finazzi D, Vanini M, Di Alessandro C, Calderoni G (2008) On the reliability of long period spectral ordinates from digital accelerograms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(5): 697–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Péquegnat C, Guéguen P, Hatzfeld D, Langlais M (2008) The French Accelerometric Network (RAP) and National Data Centre (RAP-NDC). Seismol Res Lett 79(1): 79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spect 24(1): 3–21. doi: 10.1193/1.2894833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia 721Google Scholar
  34. Rupakhety R, Halldorsson B, Sigbjörnsson R (2010) Estimating coseismic deformations from near source strong motion records: methods and case studies. Bull Earthq Eng 8(4): 787–811. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9167-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 337–352Google Scholar
  36. Sadigh K, Chang CY, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 180–189Google Scholar
  37. Sylvander M, Souriau A, Rigo A, Tocheport A, Toutain JP, Ponsolles C, Benahmed S (2008) The 2006 November, M L = 5.0 earthquake near Lourdes (France): new evidence for NS extension across the Pyrenees. Geophys J Int 175(2): 649–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03911.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trifunac MD (1972) A note on correction of strong-motion accelerograms for instrument response. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(1): 401–409Google Scholar
  39. Trifunac MD (1978) Response spectra of earthquake ground motions. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 104(EM5): 1081–1097Google Scholar
  40. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2007) A performance-based approach to define the site specific earthquake ground motion. Regulatory Guide 1.208Google Scholar
  41. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2008) Interim staff guidance on seismic issues associated with high frequency ground motion in design certification and combined license applications. Interim Staff Guidance DC/COL-ISG1Google Scholar
  42. Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y, Fukushima Y (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3): 898–913. doi: 10.1785/0120050122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earthquake Engineering Research CentreUniversity of IcelandSelfossIceland
  2. 2.RNSC/RIS, BRGMOrléans Cedex 2France
  3. 3.US Geological SurveyMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations