Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 67–80 | Cite as

An application of EMS98 in a medium-sized city: The case of L’Aquila (Central Italy) after the April 6, 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake

  • A. Tertulliani
  • L. Arcoraci
  • M. Berardi
  • F. Bernardini
  • R. Camassi
  • C. Castellano
  • S. Del Mese
  • E. Ercolani
  • L. Graziani
  • I. Leschiutta
  • A. Rossi
  • M. Vecchi
Original Research Paper

Abstract

This paper describes the damage survey in the city of L’Aquila after the 6 April 2009 earthquake. The earthquake, whose magnitude and intensity reached Mw = 6.3 and Imax = 9–10 MCS, struck the Abruzzi region of Central Italy producing severe damage in L’Aquila and in many villages along the Middle Aterno River valley. After the event, a building-to-building survey was performed in L’Aquila downtown aiming to collect data in order to perform a strict evaluation of the damage. The survey was carried out under the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS98) to evaluate the local macroseismic intensity. This damage survey represents the most complex application of the EMS98 in Italy since it became effective. More than 1,700 buildings (99% of the building stock) were taken into account during the survey at L’Aquila downtown, highlighting the difficult application of the macroseismic scale in a large urban context. The EMS98 revealed itself to be the best tool to perform such kind of analysis in urban settings. The complete survey displayed evidence of peculiar features in the damage distribution. Results revealed that the highest rate of collapses occurred within a delimited area of the historical centre and along the SW border of the fluvial terrace on which the city is settled. Intensity assessed for L’Aquila downtown was 8–9 EMS.

Keywords

Macroseismic intensity EMS98 Damage survey L’Aquila 6 April 2009 earthquake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernardini A (2008) Vulnerability analyses in a sample of 18 municipalities in the Veneto-Friuli area (NE Italy). Boll Geofis Teor Appl 49(3–4): 447–462Google Scholar
  2. Bernardini A, Valluzzi MR, Modena C, D’Ayala D, Speranza E (2008) Vulnerability assessment of the historical masonry building typologies of Vittorio Veneto (NE Italy). Boll Geofis Teor Appl 49(3–4): 463–483Google Scholar
  3. Centofanti M (1992) La costruzione dell’immagine delle piazze, in Aquila, Città di piazze, Carsa Edizioni, PescaraGoogle Scholar
  4. Clementi A, Piroddi E (1986) L’Aquila. Laterza Edizioni, BariGoogle Scholar
  5. Demangeot J (1965) Géomorphologie des Abruzzes Adriatiques. Mém. et Doc. du C.N.R.S., Paris, p 403Google Scholar
  6. De Matteis A (1973) L’ Aquila e il contado: demografia e fiscalità (secoli XV-XVIII). Giannini ed., Napoli 1973Google Scholar
  7. Dolce M, Masi A, Marino M, Vona M (2003) Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bull Earthq Eng 1: 115–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galli P, Camassi R (eds) (2009) Rapporto sugli effetti del terremoto aquilano del 6 aprile 2009, DPC-INGV QUEST Team. http://www.mi.ingv.it/eq/090406/quest.html. Accessed 28 Jul 2009
  9. Grünthal, G (eds) (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998. European Seismological Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. Guidoboni E, Ferrari G, Mariotti D, Comastri A, Tarabusi G, Valensise G (2007) CFTI4Med, catalogue of strong earthquakes in Italy (461 B.C.-1997) and Mediterranean Area (760 B.C.-1500). INGV-SGA. Available from http://storing.ingv.it/cfti4med/
  11. Sieberg A (1930) Die Erdbeben, Handbuch der Geophysik 4, tab.102. Berlin, pp 527–686Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Tertulliani
    • 1
  • L. Arcoraci
    • 1
  • M. Berardi
    • 1
  • F. Bernardini
    • 2
  • R. Camassi
    • 2
  • C. Castellano
    • 1
  • S. Del Mese
    • 1
  • E. Ercolani
    • 2
  • L. Graziani
    • 1
  • I. Leschiutta
    • 1
  • A. Rossi
    • 1
  • M. Vecchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaRomaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations