Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 847–858 | Cite as

Simulating the Taipei basin response by numerical modeling of wave propagation

  • Joachim MiksatEmail author
  • Kuo-Liang Wen
  • Vladimir Sokolov
  • Chun-Te Chen
  • Friedemann Wenzel
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Taipei, the capital of Taiwan, suffered from destructive earthquakes four times during the 20th century (M L = 7.3 on April 15, 1909; M L = 6.8 on November 15, 1986; the Chi–Chi M L = 7.3 earthquake on September 21, 1999; and M L = 6.8 on March 31, 2002). Analysis of recorded data shows a strong dependence of spectral amplification in the Taipei Basin on earthquake depth and azimuth. At low frequencies (f < 3 Hz) significant larger amplifications are observed for shallow earthquakes as compared to intermediate depth events. The former ones also display strong azimuthal dependence. As structures with large response periods such as bridges and tall buildings are sensitive to these low frequencies the understanding of the associated wave effects within the basin and their role for site effect amplification is critical. The tool we employ is 3D finite-difference modeling of wave propagation of incident wave fronts. The available detailed model of the basin allows studying the wave effects. Modeling clearly reveals that basin edge effects as observed in data are related to surface wave generation at the basin edges with a high degree of azimuthal dependency. The reproduced site amplification effects are in qualitative agreement with the observations from strong motion data.

Keywords

Basin effects Numerical modeling Finite-differences Wave propagation Spectral amplifications 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cerjan C, Kosloff D, Kosloff R, Reshef M (1985) A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete and elastic wave equations. Geophysics 50(4): 705–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, WF, Scawthorn, C (eds) (2003) Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. CIAT (2004) Void-filled seamless SRTM data v1, 2004, International centre for tropical agriculture (CIAT). Available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database: http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org
  4. Clayton R, Enquist B (1977) Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bull Seism Soc Am 67(6): 1529–1540Google Scholar
  5. Furumura T, Chen L (2004) Large scale parallel simulation and visualization of 3-D seismic wavefield using the Earth Simulator. Comput Model Eng Sci 6(2): 153–168Google Scholar
  6. Furumura T, Chen L (2005) Parallel simulation of strong ground motions during recent and historical damaging earthquakes in Tokyo, Japan. Parallel Comput 31(2): 149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Furumura T, Kennett K (2005) Subduction zone guided waves and the heterogeneity structure of the subducted plate: Intensity anomalies in northern Japan. J Geophys Res 110: B10,302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee SJ, Chen HW, Huang BS (2008) Simulations of strong ground motion and 3D amplification effect in the Taipei basin by using a composite grid finite-difference method. Bull Seism Soc Am 98(3): 1229–1242. doi: 10.1785/0120060098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee SJ, Chen HW, Liu Q, Komatitsch D, Huang BS, Tromp J (2008) Three-dimensional simulations of seismic-wave propagation in the Taipei basin with realistic topography based upon the spectral-element method. Bull Seism Soc Am 98(1): 253–264. doi: 10.1785/0120070033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee SJ, Chan YC, Komatitsch D, Huang BS, Tromp J (2009) Effects of realistic surface topography on seismic ground motion in the Yangminshan region of Taiwan based upon the spectral-element method and LiDAR DTM. Bull Seism Soc Am 99(2A): 681–693. doi: 10.1785/0120080264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miksat J, Müller T, Wenzel F (2008) Simulating 3D seismograms in 2.5D structures by combining 2D finite-difference modeling and ray tracing. Geophys J Int 174(1): 309–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03800.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Olsen KB, Akinci A, Rovelli A, Marra F, Malagnini L (2006) 3D ground-motion estimation in Rome, Italy. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(1): 133–146. doi: 10.1785/0120030243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sokolov V, Wen KL, Miksat J, Wenzel F, Chen CT (2008) Analysis of Taipei basin response on earthquakes of various depth and location using empirical data. paper presented at 31st General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission ESC 2008, Hersonissos, Greece, 7–12 September, pp 435–442Google Scholar
  14. Sokolov V, Wen KL, Miksat J, Wenzel F, Chen CT (2009) Analysis of Taipei basin response on earthquakes of various depth and location using empirical data. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 20(5): 687–702. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2008.10.15.01(T) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sokolov VY, Loh CH, Wen KL (2000) Empirical study of sediment-filled basin response: the case of Taipei city. Earthquake Spectra 16(3): 681–707. doi: 10.1193/1.1586134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teng LS, Lee CT, Peng CH, Chen WF, Chu CJ (2001) Origin and geological evolution of the Taipei basin, northern Taiwan. West Pac Earth Sci 1(2): 115–142Google Scholar
  17. Wang CY, Lee YH, Ger ML, Chen YL (2004) Investigating subsurface structures and P- and S-wave velocities in the Taipei Basin. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 15(4): 609–627Google Scholar
  18. Wen KL, Peng HY (1998) Site effect analysis in the Taipei basin: results from TSMIP network data. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 9(4): 691–704Google Scholar
  19. Wen KL, Lin CM, Chen CT (2007) Site response in the Taipei urban area from dense microtremor survey. paper presented at Fourth International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Center for Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 5–6 March, pp 139–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Miksat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kuo-Liang Wen
    • 2
  • Vladimir Sokolov
    • 1
  • Chun-Te Chen
    • 2
  • Friedemann Wenzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.National Central UniversityJhongli CityTaiwan (R.O.C)

Personalised recommendations