Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 387–400 | Cite as

Seismic response of nonstructural components in case of nonlinear structures based on floor response spectra method

  • Marcelo OropezaEmail author
  • Pascale Favez
  • Pierino Lestuzzi
Original Research Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the response of nonstructural components in the presence of nonlinear behavior of the primary structure using floor response spectra method (FRS). The effect of several parameters such as initial natural frequency of the primary structure, natural frequency of the nonstructural components (subsystem), strength reduction factor and hysteretic model have been studied. A database of 164 registered ground acceleration time histories from the European Strong-Motion Database is used. Results are presented in terms of amplification factor and resonance factor. Amplification factor quantifies the effect of inelastic deformations of the primary structure on subsystem response. Resonance factor quantifies the variation of the subsystem response considering the primary structure acceleration. Obtained results differed from precedent studies, particularly for higher primary structure periods. Values of amplification factor are improved. Obtained results of resonance factor highlight an underestimation of peak values according to current design codes such as Eurocode 8. Therefore a new formulation is proposed.

Keywords

Nonlinear seismic behavior Nonstructural components Floor response spectra Resonance factor Amplification factor Nonlinear time history analysis Hysteretic model Recorded earthquake ground motions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allahabadi R, Powell GH (1988) Drain-2DX user guide. Report No. UCB/EERC-88/06. College of Engineering, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys N, Smit P, Sigbjornsson R, Suhadolc P, Margaris B (2002) Internet-site for european strong-motion database (ESD). European Commission, Research-Directorate General, Environment and Climate Programme. http://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk/ESD/frameset.htm
  3. Chaudhuri SR, Villaverde R (2008) Effect of building nonlinearity on seismic response of nonstructural components: a parametric study. ASCE J Struct Eng 134(4): 661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Soong TT (1988) State-of-the-art review: seismic response of secondary systems. Eng Struct 10(4): 218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra A (2001) Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. ISBN: 0-13-086973-2. Prentice Hall, Englewood-CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. European Committee for Standardisation (CEN)(2003) Design of structures for earthquake resistance. European prestandard prEN 1998–1:2003 Eurocode 8. In: European StandardsGoogle Scholar
  7. Favez P (2007) Spectre de plancher et comportement non-linéaire. Semester project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFLGoogle Scholar
  8. Kingston KM (2004) An evaluation of floor response spectra for acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components supported on regular frame structures. Master’s thesis, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  9. Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2003a) An experimental confirmation of the equal displacement rule for RC structural walls. In Proceedings of the fib-symposium: concrete structures in seismic regions, Paper no 127. Athens, Greece, 6–8 May 2003Google Scholar
  10. Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2003b) The γ-model: a simple hysteretic model for reinforced concrete walls. In Proceedings of the fib-symposium: concrete structures in seismic regions, Paper no 126. Athens, Greece, 6–8 May 2003Google Scholar
  11. Lestuzzi P, Belmouden Y, Trueb M (2007) Nonlinear seismic behaviour of structures with limited hysteretic energy dissipation capacity. Bull Earthq Eng 5(4): 549–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lestuzzi P, Schwab P, Koller M, Lacave C (2004) How to choose earthquake recordings for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin J, Mahin S (1985) Seismic response of light subsystems on inelastic structures. ASCE. J struct eng 111(2): 400–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Litton RW (1975) A contribution to the analysis of concrete structures under cyclic loading. PhD thesis, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Otani S (1974) Inelastic analysis of R/C frame structures. J Struct Div 100(7): 1433–1449Google Scholar
  16. Saatcioglu M (1991) Modeling hysteretic force-deformation relationships for reinforced concrete elements. Am Concr Inst (ACI-SP) 127: 153–198Google Scholar
  17. Saiidi M, Sozen MA (1981) Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of rc structures. ASCE J Struct Div (Proc Am Soc Civil Eng) 107(5): 937–953Google Scholar
  18. Schwab P, Lestuzzi P (2007) Assessment of the seismic non-linear behaviour of ductile wall structures due to synthetic earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 5(1): 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA) (2003) Actions on structures, SIA261:2003. SN 505 261. In Swiss StandardsGoogle Scholar
  20. Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. ASCE J Struct Div (Proc Am Soc Civil Eng) 96(12): 2557–2573Google Scholar
  21. Triou P (2006) Influence de la non linéarité sur les spectres de plancher. Master’s thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFLGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo Oropeza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pascale Favez
    • 1
  • Pierino Lestuzzi
    • 1
  1. 1.IIC-Civil Engineering Institute, EPFL-École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneENAC-IIC-ENAC Bâtiment GCLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations