Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 367–388 | Cite as

Ground-motion prediction equations for the intermediate depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes

  • Vladimir SokolovEmail author
  • Klaus-Peter Bonjer
  • Friedemann Wenzel
  • Bogdan Grecu
  • Mircea Radulian
Original Research Paper

Abstract

We present the regional ground-motion prediction equations for peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA), and seismic intensity (MSK scale) for the Vrancea intermediate depth earthquakes (SE-Carpathians) and territory of Romania. The prediction equations were constructed using the stochastic technique on the basis of the regional Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) source scaling and attenuation models and the generalised site amplification functions. Values of considered ground motion parameters are given as the functions of earthquake magnitude, depth and epicentral distance. The developed ground-motion models were tested and calibrated using the available data from the large Vrancea earthquakes. We suggest to use the presented equations for the rapid estimation of seismic effect after strong earthquakes (Shakemap generation) and seismic hazard assessment, both deterministic and probabilistic approaches.

Keywords

Vrancea region Strong ground motion Prediction equations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambraseys NN (1977) Long-period effects in the Romanian earthquake of March 1977. Nature 268(5618): 324–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson J, Hough S (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74: 1969–1993Google Scholar
  3. Bonjer KP, Oncescu L, Rizescu M, Enescu D, Driad L, Radulian M, Ionescu M, Moldoveanu T (2000) Source- and site-parameters of the April 28, 1999 intermediate-depth Vrancea earthquake: first results from the new K2-network in Romania. I: Book of Abstracts and Papers, XXVII General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Lisbon, SSA-2-13-O, p 53Google Scholar
  4. Bonjer KP, Sokolov V, Wirth W, Rizescu M, Driad L, Treml M (2001) The seismogenic potential of the Vrancea subduction zone–quantification of source- and site-effects of great events. Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 461 “Strong Earthquakes: a Challenge for Geosciences and Civil Engineering”, Report of 1999–2001, University of Karlsruhe, pp 259–293 (in German)Google Scholar
  5. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160: 635–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75: 4997–5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (1998) 1997 NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulation for new buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington DC, FEMA 302Google Scholar
  8. Bune VI, Radu K, Polyakova TP (1986) Analysis of isoseismal schemes of the Vrancea earthquakes of November 10, 1940, and March 4, 1977. Problems of Engineering Seismology, vol 27, Nauka Publishing House Moscow, pp 126–135 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Chernov Y, Sokolov V (1999) Correlation of seismic intensity with Fourier acceleration spectra. Phys Chem Earth 24(6): 522–528Google Scholar
  10. Enescu D (1997) Ground movement acceleration-macroseismic intensity relations for Vrancea earthquakes. Considerations of the macroseismic maps of some of these earthquakes. St Cerc Geol Geogr Geofiz 35: 15–27Google Scholar
  11. Ismail-Zade A, Sokolov V, Bonjer KP (2007) Tectonic stress, seismicity and seismic hazard in the South-Eastern Carpathians. Nat Hazards 42(3): 493–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivan IA, Enescu BD, Pantea A (1998) Input for seismic hazard assessment using Vrancea source region. Rom J Phys 43: 619–636Google Scholar
  13. Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83: 1574–1594Google Scholar
  14. Lungu D, Demetriu S, Radu C, Coman O (1995) Uniform hazard response spectra for Vrancea earthquakes in Romania. In: Duma G(eds) Proceedings 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 365–370Google Scholar
  15. Lungu D, Zaicenco A, Cornea T, Van Gelder P (1997) Seismic hazard: recurrence and attenuation of subcrustal (60–170km) earthquakes. Struct Saf 7: 1525–1532Google Scholar
  16. Lungu D, Cornea T, Nedelcu C et al (1999) Hazard assessment and site dependent response for Vrancea earthquakes. In: (eds) Vrancea earthquakes: tectonics, hazard and risk mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 251–267Google Scholar
  17. Lungu D, Demetriu S, Aldea A, Arion C (2006) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Vrancea earthquakes and seismic action in the new seismic code of Romania. In: Proceedings of first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, September 3–8 2006, Geneva Switzerland, CD_ROM, paper 1003Google Scholar
  18. Mandrescu N (1972) Experimental research on seismic microzoning. St Cerc Geol Geogr Geofiz 10(2): 103–116 (In Romanian)Google Scholar
  19. Mandrescu N, Radulian M et al (1999) Macroseismic field of the Romanian intermediate-depth earthquakes. In: (eds) Vrancea earthquakes: tectonics, hazard and risk mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 163–174Google Scholar
  20. Mandrescu N, Anghel M, Smalberbergher V (1988) The Vrancea intermediate-depth earthquakes and the peculiarities of the seismic intensity distribution over the Romanian territory. St Cerc Geol Geogr Geofiz 26: 51–57Google Scholar
  21. Mandrescu N, Radulian M, Marmureanu Gh (2007) Geological, geophysical and seismological criteria for local response evaluation in Bucharest urban area. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 27: 367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marza VI, Pantea AI (1994) Probabilistic estimation of seismic intensity attenuation for Vrancea (Romania) subcrustal sources. In: Proc. XXIV Gen. Assembly ESC, Athens, Greece, 19–24 September 1994, vol. III, pp 1752–1761Google Scholar
  23. Marza VI, Kijko A, Mantyniemi P (1991) Estimate of earthquake hazard in the Vrancea (Romania) region. Pure Appl Geophys 136: 143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moldoveanu CL, Panza GF (2001) Vrancea source influence on local seismic response in Bucharest. Pure Apll Geophys 158: 2407–2429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moldoveanu CL, Radulian M, Marmureanu G, Panza GF (2004) Microzonation of Bucharest: state-of-art. Pure Apll Geophys 161: 1125–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radulian M, Vaccari F, Mandrescu N, Panza GF, Moldoveanu CL (2000) Seismic hazard of Romania: deterministic approach. Pure Appl Geophys 157: 221–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Radulian M, Panza GF, Popa M, Grecu B (2006) Seismic wave attenuation for Vrancea events revisited. J Earthquake Eng 10: 411–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandi H (2001) Obstacles to earthquake risk reduction encountered in Romania. In: Lungu D, Saito T (eds) Earthquake hazard and countermeasures for existing fragile buildings, pp 261–266Google Scholar
  29. Sokolov V (2002) Seismic intensity and Fourier acceleration spectra: revised relationship. Earthq Spectra 18: 161–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sokolov V, Bonjer KP (2006) Modelling of distribution of ground motion parameters during strong Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva Switzerland 3–8 September 2006, CD-ROM, Paper 363Google Scholar
  31. Sokolov V, Wenzel F (2007) Seismic hazard assessment for areas with a lack of empirical strong ground motion data: a case of Romania. In: Proceedings of 3rd Indian-German Workshop on seismic safety of structures, risk assessment and disaster mitigation, Mumbay India 12–14 March 2007, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  32. Sokolov V, Loh CH, Wen KL (2000) Empirical study of sediment-filled basin response: a case of Taipei city. Earthquake Spectra 16: 681–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Wenzel F (2004a) Accounting for site effect in probabilistic assessment of seismic hazard for Romania and Bucharest: a case of deep seismicity in Vrancea zone. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(12): 927–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Rizescu M (2004b) Assessment of site effect in Romania during intermediate depth Vrancea earthquakes using different techniques. In: IUGG special volume earthquake hazard, risk, and strong ground motion. Seismological Press Beijing, pp 295–322Google Scholar
  35. Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Oncescu M, Rizescu M (2005) Hard rock spectral models for inermediate-depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95: 1749–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wills CJ, Petersen M, Bryant WA, Reichle M, Saucedo GJ, Tan S, Taylor G, Treiman J (2000) A site conditions map for California based on geology and shear-wave velocity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90: S187–S208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Sokolov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Klaus-Peter Bonjer
    • 1
  • Friedemann Wenzel
    • 1
  • Bogdan Grecu
    • 2
  • Mircea Radulian
    • 2
  1. 1.Geophysical InstituteKarlsruhe UniversityKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.National Institute for Earth PhysicsBucharest-MagureleRomania

Personalised recommendations