Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cyclic behaviour of slender cantilever columns in full-scale models of precast industrial buildings, designed by Eurocode 8, was studied experimentally and analytically. The shear span ratio of the columns was 12.5, which is more than allowed by Eurocode 8 for columns in frame structures (10). High deformability and a large deformation capacity (8%~drift) of the columns was observed. A lumped plasticity model was used in the analysis. In the paper the observed behaviour of the models has been compared with the predicted behaviour obtained by several empirically based models and procedures. It was observed that these models, which were developed for much lower shear span ratios (2–6), were not applicable for the analyzed very slender columns without appropriate additional considerations and modifications. In the case of such columns the yield drift is dominated by the flexural mode (it is practically proportional to the height of the column) and the ultimate drift under cyclic loading conditions is only slightly dependent on the shear span (indicating that the ratio of the equivalent length of the plastic hinge to the height of the column decreases with the increasing shear span). An appropriately modified lumped plasticity model incorporating in-cycle and repeated-cycle strength deterioration was chosen for future use in performance-based design and seismic risk studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bindini F, Toniolo G (2004) Validation of seismic design criteria for concrete frames based on Monte Carlo simulation and full-scale pseudodynamic tests. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6 August 2004

  • CEN (2004a) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels

  • CEN (2004b) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN, Brussels

  • Fardis MN, Biskins DE (2003) Deformation capacity of RC members, as controlled by flexure or shear. In: Kabeyasawa T, Shiohara H (eds) Performance-based engineering for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete structures: a volume honoring Shunsuke Otani, University of Tokyo, 8–9 September 2003

  • Haselton CB (2006) Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Dissertation, Stanford University

  • Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(12): 1489–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8): 1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OpenSees (2007) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. http://opensees.berkeley.edu. Cited 30 August 2007

  • Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN (2001) Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Struct J 98(2): 135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Paulay T (1975) Reinforced concrete structures. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Kent DC, Sampson RA (1972) Reinforced Concrete Members with Cyclic Loading. J Struct Div, ASCE 98: 1341–1360

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulay T, Priestley MJN (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER Structural Performance Database (2007) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/spd. Cited 30 August 2007

  • Peruš I, Fajfar P (2007) Prediction of the force-drift envelope for RC columns in flexure by the CAE method. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36: 2345–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priesley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielson NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. ASCE J Struct Div 96(12): 2557–2573

    Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo G (coordinator) (2007) Final report of the EU Research Project: seismic behaviour of precast concrete structures with respect to EC8 (Contract No. G6RD-CT-2002-00857)

  • Tsoukantas SG, Tassios TP (1989) Shear resistance of connections between reinforced concrete linear precast elements.. ACI Struct J 86(3): 242–249

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej Fischinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischinger, M., Kramar, M. & Isaković, T. Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 6, 519–534 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9064-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9064-7

Keywords

Navigation