Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 1–53 | Cite as

Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration

  • N. N. Ambraseys
  • J. Douglas
  • S. K. Sarma
  • P. M. Smit


This article presents equations for the estimation of horizontal strong ground motions caused by shallow crustal earthquakes with magnitudes Mw ≥ 5 and distance to the surface projection of the fault less than 100km. These equations were derived by weighted regression analysis, used to remove observed magnitude-dependent variance, on a set of 595 strong-motion records recorded in Europe and the Middle East. Coefficients are included to model the effect of local site effects and faulting mechanism on the observed ground motions. The equations include coefficients to model the observed magnitude-dependent decay rate. The main findings of this study are that: short-period ground motions from small and moderate magnitude earthquakes decay faster than the commonly assumed 1/r, the average effect of differing faulting mechanisms is not large and corresponds to factors between 0.8 (normal and odd) and 1.3 (thrust) with respect to strike-slip motions and that the average long-period amplification caused by soft soil deposits is about 2.6 over those on rock sites. Disappointingly the standard deviations associated with the derived equations are not significantly lower than those found in previous studies.


strong ground motion estimation attenuation relations Europe Middle East 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamson, N.A., Litehiser, J.J. 1989Attenuation of vertical peak accelerationBulletin of the Seismological Society of America79549580Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J. 1997Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakesSeismological Research Letters6894127Google Scholar
  3. Ambraseys, N., Smit, P., Berardi, R., Rinaldis, D., Cotton, F. and Berge, C. (2000) Dissemination of European Strong-Motion Data. CD-ROM collection. European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Environmental and Climate Programme, ENV4-CT97-0397, Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar
  4. Ambraseys, N., Smit, P., Sigbjörnsson, R., Suhadolc, P. and Margaris, B. (2002) Internet-Site for European Strong-Motion Data. http://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk. European Commission, Directorate- General XII, Environmental and Climate Programme, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  5. Ambraseys, N.N., Bommer, J.J. 1991The attenuation of ground accelerations in EuropeEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics2011791202Google Scholar
  6. Ambraseys, N.N., Douglas, J. 2003Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motionsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering23118Google Scholar
  7. Ambraseys, N.N., Simpson, K.A. 1996Prediction of vertical response spectra in EuropeEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics25401412Google Scholar
  8. Ambraseys, N.N., Bommer, J.J., Sarma, S.K. 1992A review of seismic ground motions for UK designDepartment of Civil Engineering, Imperial CollegeLondonESEE Report 92-8. Nov.Google Scholar
  9. Ambraseys, N.N., Simpson, K.A., Bommer, J.J. 1996Prediction of horizontal response spectra in EuropeEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics25371400Google Scholar
  10. Ambraseys, N.N., Douglas, J., Sigbjörnsson, R., Berge-Thierry, C., Suhadolc, P., Costa, G. and Smit, P.M. (2004a). Dissemination of European Strong-Motion Data, vol. 2 using Strong-Motion Datascape Navigator. CD-ROM collection, Feb. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  11. Ambraseys, N.N., Douglas, J., Sigbjörnsson, R., Berge-Thierry, C., Suhadolc, P., Costa, G. and Smit, P.M. (2004b) Dissemination of European Strong-Motion Data, vol. 2. In Proceedings of Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper no. 32. Google Scholar
  12. Ambraseys, N.N., Smit, P., Douglas, J., Margaris, B., Sigbjörnsson, R., Ólafsson, S., Suhadolc, P., Costa, G. 2004cInternet site for European strong-motion dataBollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata45113129Google Scholar
  13. Aptikaev, F. and Kopnichev, J. (1980) Correlation between seismic vibration parameters and type of faulting. Pages 107--110 of: Proceedings of Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 1. Google Scholar
  14. Atkinson, G.M., Boore, D.M. 2003Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regionsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America9317031729Google Scholar
  15. Bolt, B.A., Abrahamson, N.A. 1982New attenuation relations for peak and expected accelerations of strong ground motionBulletin of the Seismological Society of America7223072321Google Scholar
  16. Bommer, J.J., Douglas, J., Strasser, F.O. 2003Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equationsBulletin of Earthquake Engineering1171203Google Scholar
  17. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B. and Fumal, T.E. (1993) Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: an interim report. Open-File Report 93-509. U.S. Geological Survey, 70 pp. Google Scholar
  18. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., Fumal, T.E. 1997Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent workSeismological Research Letters68128153Google Scholar
  19. Brady, A.G., Trifunac, M.D. & Hudson, D.E. (1973) Analyses of strong motion earthquake accelerograms -- response spectra. Tech. Rept., Feb. Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory -- California Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  20. Brillinger, D.R., Preisler, H.K. 1984An exploratory analysis of the Joyner–Boore attenuation dataBulletin of the Seismological Society of America7414411450Google Scholar
  21. Campbell, K.W. 1997Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectraSeismological Research Letters68154179Google Scholar
  22. Campbell, K.W., Bozorgnia, Y. 2003Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectraBulletin of the Seismological Society of America93314331Google Scholar
  23. Chen, S.-Z., Atkinson, G.M. 2002Global comparison of earthquake source spectraBulletin of the Seismological Society of America92885895Google Scholar
  24. Chen, Y.-H., Tsai, C.-C.P. 2002A new method for estimation of the attenuation relationship with variance componentsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America9219841991Google Scholar
  25. Converse, A.M. and Brady, A.G. (1992) BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software, version 1.0. Open-File Report 92-296A, Mar. US Geological Survey. Google Scholar
  26. Cousins, W.J., Zhao, J.X., Perrin, N.D. 1999A model for the attenuation of peak ground acceleration in New Zealand earthquakes based on seismograph and accelerograph dataBulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering32193220Google Scholar
  27. Crouse, C.B., McGuire, J.W. 1996Site response studies for purpose of revising NEHRP seismic provisionsEarthquake Spectra12407439Google Scholar
  28. Donovan, N.C., Bornstein, A.E. 1978Uncertainties in seismic risk analysis. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering DivisionASCE104869887Google Scholar
  29. Douglas, J. (2001) A critical reappraisal of some problems in engineering seismology. Ph.D. thesis, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Douglas, J. 2002Note on scaling of peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity with magnitudeGeophysical Journal International148336339Google Scholar
  31. Douglas, J. 2003aEarthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinatesEarth-Science Reviews6143104Google Scholar
  32. Douglas, J. 2003bNote on the inclusion of site classification information in equations to estimate strong ground motionsJournal of Earthquake Engineering7373380Google Scholar
  33. Douglas, J. (2003c) A note on the use of strong-motion data from small magnitude earthquakes for empirical ground motion estimation. In Skopje Earthquake 40 Years of European Earthquake Engineering (SE-40EEE), Aug. Google Scholar
  34. Douglas, J. 2003dWhat is a poor quality strong-motion record?Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering1141156Google Scholar
  35. Douglas, J. 2004aAn investigation of analysis of variance as a tool for exploring regional differences in strong ground motionsJournal of Seismology8485496Google Scholar
  36. Douglas, J. (2004b) Use of analysis of variance for the investigation of regional dependence of strong ground motions. In Proceedings of Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper no. 29. Google Scholar
  37. Douglas, J., Smit, P.M. 2001How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America9119171923Google Scholar
  38. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1981) Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Ekström, G., Dziewonski, A.M. 1988Evidence of bias in estimations of earthquake sizeNature332319323Google Scholar
  40. Frankel, A., McGarr, A., Bicknell, J., Mori, J., Seeber, L., Cranswick, E. 1990Attenuation of high frequency shear waves in the crust: measurements from New York State, South Africa and southern CaliforniaJournal of Geophysical Research951744117457Google Scholar
  41. Frohlich, C., Apperson, K.D. 1992Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundariesTectonics11279296Google Scholar
  42. Fukushima, Y. 1996Scaling relations for strong ground motion prediction models with M2 termsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America86329336Google Scholar
  43. Hudson, D.E. 1979Reading and Interpreting Strong Motion AccelerogramsEarthquake Engineering Research InstituteBerkeley, USA112Google Scholar
  44. Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M. 1981Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley,California, earthquakeBulletin of the Seismological Society of America7120112038Google Scholar
  45. Joyner, W.B., Boore, D.M. 1993Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion dataBulletin of the Seismological Society of America83469487Google Scholar
  46. Kanamori, H. 1977The energy release in great earthquakesJournal of Geophysical Research8229812987Google Scholar
  47. Lussou, P., Bard, P.Y., Cotton, F., Fukushima, Y. 2001Seismic design regulation codes: contribution of K-Net data to site effect evaluationJournal of Earthquake Engineering51333Google Scholar
  48. Lyon-Caen, H., Armijo, R., Drakopoulos, J., Baskoutass, J., Delibassis, N., Gaulon, R., Kouskouna, V., Latoussakis, J., Makropoulos, K., Papadimitriou, P., Papanastassiou, D., Pedotti, G. 1986The 1986 Kalamata (south Peloponnesus) earthquake: detailed study of a normal fault, evidences for east-west extension in the Hellenic ArcJournal of Geophysical Research931496715000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marra, F., Azzara, R., Bellucci, F., Caserta, A., Cultrera, G., Mele, G., Palombo, B., Rovelli, A., Boschi, E. 2000Large amplification of ground motion at rock sites within a fault zone in Nocera Umbra (central Italy)Journal of Seismology4543554Google Scholar
  50. Ouyed, M., Yielding, G., Hatzfeld, D., King, G.C.P. 1983An aftershock study of the El Asnam (Algeria) earthquake of 1980 October 10Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society73605639Google Scholar
  51. PML (1985) Seismological studies for UK hazard analysis. Tech. Rept. 346/85. Principia Mechanica Ltd., London. Not seen. Reported in Ambraseys et al. (1992). Google Scholar
  52. Pondrelli, S., Morelli, A., Ekstrom, G., Mazza, S., Boschi, E., Dziewonski, A.M. 2002European-Mediterranean regional centroid-moment tensors: 1997--2000Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors13071101Google Scholar
  53. Rhoades, D.A. 1997Estimation of attenuation relations for strong-motion data allowing for individual earthquake magnitude uncertaintiesBulletin of the Seismological Society of America8716741678Google Scholar
  54. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F., Youngs, R.R. 1997Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion dataSeismological Research Letters68180189Google Scholar
  55. Sen, M.K. (1990) Deep structural complexity and site response in Los Angeles basin. Pages 545--553 of: Proceedings of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 1, May. Google Scholar
  56. Somerville, P.G. 2003Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulsePhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors137201212Google Scholar
  57. Spudich, P., Joyner, W.B., Lindh, A.G., Boore, D.M., Margaris, B.M., Fletcher, J.B. 1999SEA99: a revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimesBulletin of the Seismological Society of America8911561170Google Scholar
  58. Utkucu, M., Nalbant, S.S., McCloskey, J., Steacy, S., Alptekin, \”O. 2003Slip distribution and stress changes associated with the 1999 November 12 Düzce (Turkey)Geophysical Journal International153229241Google Scholar
  59. Wells, D.L., Coppersmith, K.J. 1994New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacementBulletin of the Seismological Society of America849741002Google Scholar
  60. Youngs, R.R., Abrahamson, N., Makdisi, F.I., Sadigh, K. 1995Magnitude-dependent variance of peak ground accelerationBulletin of the Seismological Society of America8511611176Google Scholar
  61. Zaré, M., Bard, P.-Y. 2002Strong motion dataset of Turkey: data processing and site classificationSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22703718Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. N. Ambraseys
    • 3
  • J. Douglas
    • 1
  • S. K. Sarma
    • 3
  • P. M. Smit
    • 2
  1. 1.ARN/RISBRGMGuilleminFrance
  2. 2.National Emergency Operations CentreZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations