Advertisement

Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 166, Issue 5, pp 686–688 | Cite as

Study of the Biocompatibility of Titanium-Niobium Implants by the Parameters of Their Osseointegration under Experimental Conditions

  • V. N. OlesovaEmail author
  • V. R. Shashmurina
  • I. A. Shugailov
  • E. E. Olesov
  • M. Z. Mirgazizov
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Superelastic titanium alloys (titanium-niobium-zirconium and titanium-niobium-tantalum) are considered to be the more advantageous choice for dental implants than titanium alloys due to their physico-mechanical properties close to those of the bone tissue. Morphological studies of the biocompatibility of these alloys in comparison with titanium were carried out in vivo. Scanning electron microscopy and microprobe elemental analysis of the tissue along the interface between the bone and titanium/superelastic titanium alloys showed similar morphology and elemental composition both on days 30 (poorly mineralized connective tissue was detected in sites of contact with titanium alloy samples) and 90 after surgery (the surface of the titanium alloy samples was covered with mineralized tissue similar by its composition to the surrounding bone).

Key Words

implant titanium-niobium bone tissue morphology elemental composition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Orthopaedic Stomatology. National Guidelines. Moscow, 2016. Russian.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grigor’ian AS, Filonov MR, Arkhipov AV, Selezneva II, Zhukova IuS. New type titan alloy with shape memory for use in dental implantology. Stomatologiya. 2013;92(1):4-8. Russian.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xhukova YuS, Petrzhik VI, Proshkin SD. Evaluation of crystallographic deformation resource during reversible martensitic transformation β↔α” in titanium alloys with shape memory effect. Metally. 2010;(6):77-84. Russian.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zagorskii VA, Robystova TG. Prosthodontics on Implants. Moscow, 2016. Russian.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klopotov AA, Gunther VE, Marchenko ES, Baigonakova GA. Effect of heattreatment on physical properties and martensitic transformation of Ti 50Ni 47.7Mo 0.3V 2 alloy with shape memory effect. Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Fizika. 2015;58(7-2):68-74. Russian.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kulakov AA, Losev FF, Gvetadze RSh. Dental Implants: Basic Principles, Current Advances. Moscow, 2006. Russian.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sysolyatin PG, Gunter VE, Sysolyatin SP, Mirgazizov MZ, Radkevich AA, Olesova VN, Khodoreko VN, Dyuryagin NM, Mel’nik DD, Tazin ID, Karnaukhov AT, Medvedev YuA, Shakirov MN, Tsayukov YuV, Olennikova MM, Rudenskikh NV, Baidik OD, Marchenko ES. Shape memory implants in maxillofacial surgery. Shape-Memory Medical Materials And Implants. VE Gunter, ed. Tomsk, 2012. Russian.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olesov EE, Shugailov IA, Mirgazizov MZ, Pozharitskaya MM, Zaslavskiy SA. Experimental study of changes in the electric potential of implants made of titanium alloys under the influence of functional dynamic load. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016;7(5):348-353.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. N. Olesova
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. R. Shashmurina
    • 1
  • I. A. Shugailov
    • 1
  • E. E. Olesov
    • 1
  • M. Z. Mirgazizov
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Center for Dentistry, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations