Advertisement

Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 166, Issue 5, pp 671–675 | Cite as

Possibilities of Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Anasarca in Newborns

  • U. N. Tumanova
  • V. M. Lyapin
  • V. G. Bychenko
  • A. I. ShchegolevEmail author
  • G. T. Sukhikh
Article
  • 6 Downloads

We studied the possibilities of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of anasarca in newborns. Before the autopsy, MRI in T1 and T2 standard modes was performed, signal intensity tomograms in the subcutaneous tissue were analyzed, and tissue hydration index was calculated. Using 3D reconstruction, we determined the values of hydrothorax, hydropericardium, and ascites, as well as specific volumes of fluid in the abdominal and thoracic cavities. It has been established that postmortem MRI of deceased newborns provides objective quantitative assessment of anasarca, as well as absolute and relative volumes of hydrothorax and ascites, which improves the diagnostic capacities of pathoanatomical autopsy or forensic examination of a corpse and contributes to the determination of tanatogenesis. However, postmortem MRI cannot fully replace traditional autopsy that allows conducting complex macroscopic and microscopic analysis of organs and tissues.

Key Words

anasarca ascites newborn postmortem MRI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kurtser MA, Gnetetskaya VA, Malmberg OL, Belkovskaya ME, Lukash YeN, Shipulin GA, Shipulina OYu, Tarasova YuA, Piksasova OV. Nonimmune fetal hydrops: diagnosis and tactics. Akush. Gin. 2009;(2):37-40. Russian.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Burov AA, Shchegolev AI, Sukhikh GT. The Possibility of Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnostics of Lung Hypoplasia. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018;165(2):288-291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Bychenko VG, Schegolev AI, Sukhikh GT. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital pneumonia. Bull. Russ. State Med. Univ. 2016;(4):44-50.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tumanova UN, Serova NS, Bychenko VG, Shchegolev AI. Possibilities of postmortem radiological studies for evaluation of lung lesions. REJR. 2018;(2):198-221. Russian.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tumanova UN, Shchegolev AI. Possibilities and limitations of virutal autopsy in neonatology. REJR. 2017;(1):20-33. Russian.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tumanova UN, Shchegolev AI. Radio-visualization of nonspecific postmortem changes in the cardiovascular system. Sub.-Med. Ekspert. 2016;59(5):59-63. Russian.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ampanozi G, Hatch GM, Ruder TD, Flach PM, Germerott T, Thali MJ, Ebert LC. Post-mortem virtual estimation of free abdominal blood volume. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012;81(9):2133-2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arthurs OJ, Barber JL, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ. Normal perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging appearances. Pediatr. Radiol. 2015;45(4):527-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christoffersen S. CT verified cause of death in hepatic hydrothorax without ascites. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2010;198(1-3):e11-e13. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.009.
  10. 10.
    Huda W. Review of Radiologic Physics, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lo Gullo R, Mishra S, Lira D.A, Padole A, Otrakji A, Khawaja RD, Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Shepard JA, Digumarthy SR, Kalra MK, Stone JR. Quantification of interstitial fluid on whole body CT: comparison with whole body autopsy. Forensic. Sci. Med. Pathol. 2015;11(4):488-496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noppen M. Normal volume and cellular contents of pleural fluid. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2001;(4):180-182.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okeke TC, Egbugara MN, Ezenyeaku CC, Ikeako LC. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Niger J. Med. 2013;22(4):266-273.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Chong W, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah AC, Owens CM, Saunders DE, Scott RJ, Jones R, Norman W, Addison S, Bainbridge A, Cady EB, Vita ED, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM; MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet. 2013;382:223-233.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zech WD, Jackowski C, Buetikofer Y, Kara L. Characterization and differentiation of body fluids, putrefaction fluid, and blood using Hounsfield unit in postmortem CT. Int. J. Legal. Med. 2014;128(5):795-802.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. N. Tumanova
    • 1
  • V. M. Lyapin
    • 1
  • V. G. Bychenko
    • 1
  • A. I. Shchegolev
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. T. Sukhikh
    • 1
  1. 1.V. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and PerinatologyMinistry of Health of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations