Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 111–114 | Cite as

Evaluation of Hemodynamic Significance of Stenosis in Multiple Involvement of the Coronary Vessels by Mathematical Simulation

  • S. S. Simakov
  • T. M. Gamilov
  • F. Yu. Kopylov
  • Yu. V. Vasilevskii
Article
  • 41 Downloads

We use a mathematical model of one-dimensional blood flow in a network of blood vessels for in silico evaluation of hemodynamic significance of stenoses in multivessel coronary disease. Two cases were addressed: two stenosed vessels with different diameters and with the same degree of occlusion and two consecutive stenoses in the same vessel. We show that two criteria for the evaluation of hemodynamic significance based on the degree of stenosis and based on fractional flow reserve can give contradictory indications for surgical intervention. We also show that fractional flow reserve computation originally proposed for a single stenosis should be modified in the case of multivessel stenotic disease.

Key Words

fractional flow reserve mathematical modelling computational hemodynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kopylov FYu, Bykova AA, Vasilevsky YuV, Simakov SS. Role of measurement of fractional flow reserve in coronary artery atherosclerosis. Ter. Arkhiv. 2015;87(9):106-113. Russian.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Danilov A, Ivanov Y, Pryamonosov R, Vassilevski Y. Methods of graph network reconstruction in personalized medicine. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 2015. Oct 13. doi:  10.1002/cnm.2754.
  3. 3.
    De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Heyndrickx GR, Hodeige D, Kirkeeide R, Gould KL. Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: Theoretical basis and animal validation. Circulation. 2000;101(15):1840-1847.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gamilov TM, Kopylov PhYu, Pryamonosov RA, Simakov SS. Virtual fractional flow reserve assesment in patient-specific coronary networks by 1D hemodynamic model. Rus. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling. 2015;30(5):269-276.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodilla E, Rossel JC, Perez-Encinas C, Perez Lahiguera F, Herzig KH, Pascual Izuel JM. The continuum of pulse wave velocity from young elite athletes to uncontrolled older patients with resistant hypertension. J. Hyperten. 2010;28(Suppl). doi:  10.1097/01.hjh.0000379142.43122.d3.
  6. 6.
    Simakov SS, Kholodov AS. Computational study of oxygen concentration in human blood under the low-frequency disturbances. Math. Mod. Comp. Simulat. 2009;1(2):283-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vassilevski YV, Danilov AA, Simakov SS, Gamilov TM, Ivanov YA, Pryamonosov RA. Patient-specific anatomical models in human physiology. Rus. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling. 2015;30(3):185-201.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zarins CK, Taylor CA, Min JK. Computed fractional flow reserve (FFTCT) derived from coronary CT angiography. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2013;6(5):708-714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. S. Simakov
    • 1
    • 3
  • T. M. Gamilov
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Yu. Kopylov
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yu. V. Vasilevskii
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT)MoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations