Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 157, Issue 5, pp 683–688 | Cite as

Cell Reconstruction of the Rectal Mucosa in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Endoscopy, Morphology, Immunohistochemistry

  • E. A. Kogan
  • D. V. Vyshegorodtsev
  • N. M. Faizullina
  • T. A. Demura
  • A. M. Kuz’minov
  • Yu. A. Shelygin
  • G. T. Sukhikh
Article
  • 48 Downloads

We propose a new surgical approach to the treatment of familial colorectal adenomatous polyposis implying preservation of a portion of the rectum with removed mucosa. For reconstruction of the rectum, allotransplantation of the mixed culture of fetal allogenic somatic cells of the intestinal epithelium and mesenchymal cells of various origin is used. The mechanisms of mucosa reparation were studied in 34 patients. Endoscopic, morphological, and immunohistochemical studies showed that cell transplantation considerably accelerated reparation of the mucosa in mucosectomized rectum. The proposed treatment of familial colorectal adenomatous polyposis allows delaying the development of rectal polyps and cancer for many years.

Key Words

familial adenomatous polyposis coli cell transplantation mesenchymal intestinal epithelium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. A. Korotaeva, T. A. Muzofarova, and I. Yu. Sachkov, et al., Med. Genet., No. 1, 14-18 (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. M. Kuzminov, Yu. Yu. Chubarov, L. F. Podmarenkova, and D. V. Vyshegorodtsev, Koloproktologiya, 10, No. 4, 22-26 (2012).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. T. Sukhikh and V. V. Malaitsev, Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 131, No. 3, 203-212 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu. A. Shelygin, A. M. Kuz’minov, D. V. Vyshegorodtsev, et al., Ros. Zh. Gastroenterol. Gepatol. Koloproktol., 22, No. 6, 53-58 (2012).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Behrends, B. A. Jerchow, M. Wurtele, et al., Science, 280, 596-599 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. J. Bussey, A. A. Eyers, S. M. Ritchie, and J. P. Thomson, Br. J. Surg., 72, Suppl., S29-S31 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Church, C. Burke, E. McGannon, et al., Dis. Colon Rectum., 46, No. 9, 1175-1181 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. G. de Campos, R. O. Perez, A. R. Imperiale, et al., J. Gastrointest. Surg., 14, No. 12, 1943-1949 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Groden, A. Thliveris, W. Samowitz, et al., Cell, 66, No. 3, 589-600 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Hotta, L. A. Stamp, J. P. Foong, et al., J. Clin. Invest., 123, No. 3, 1182-1191 (2013).PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Moussata, S. Nancey, M. G. Lapalus, et al., Endoscopy, 40, No. 2, 120-125 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Sanchez, I. Gutierrez-Aranda, G. Ligero, et al., Stem Cells, 29, No. 2, 251-262 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. D. Wood, Cur. Opin. Gastroenterol., 27, No. 2, 106-111 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Kogan
    • 2
  • D. V. Vyshegorodtsev
    • 1
  • N. M. Faizullina
    • 2
  • T. A. Demura
    • 2
  • A. M. Kuz’minov
    • 1
  • Yu. A. Shelygin
    • 1
  • G. T. Sukhikh
    • 1
  1. 1.State Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia
  2. 2.V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations