Advertisement

Age-Specific Features of Estrous Cycles and Folliculogenesis in GC Female Rats Selected by Catatonic Reactivity

  • D. V. Klochkov
  • T. A. Alekhina
  • O. I. Prokudina
Article

A decrease in the total count of follicles in the diestrus and proestrus and higher incidence of permanent estruses were found in 3-month-old females of the catatonic GC rat strain in comparison with Wistar females (control). At the age of 6–12 months, GC females had lower incidence of long estrus and diestrus. The estrous cycle of GC females was shorter than of Wistar rats. With aging (at the age of 18 months), the counts of growing and maturing follicles signifi cantly decreased. Higher counts of growing single-layer and bilayer follicles were found in 18-month-old GC females. Differences in the length of estrus and diestrus and in the incidence of abnormal phases in the two strains also disappeared at this age. Selection by high catatonic reactivity was associated with a decrease in body weight.

Key Words

folliculogenesis GC strain estrous cycle catatonia 

References

  1. 1.
    D. V. Klochkov, T. A. Alekhina, and N. N. Barykina, Zh. Evoluts. Biokhim. Fiziol., 45, No. 3, 329–333 (2009).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. G. Kolpakov, A. V. Kulikov, T. A. Alekhina, et al., Genetika, 40, No. 6, 1–7 (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Cyr, F. Calon, M. Morissette, and T. Di Paolo, J. Psychiatry Neurosci., 27, No. 1, 12–27 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Häfner, S. Behrens, J. de Vry, and W. F. Gattaz, Psychiatry Res., 38, No. 2, 125–134 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. G. Kolpakov, N. N. Barykina, T. A. Alekhina, et al., Novosibirsk: Institute of Cytology and Genetics. Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences (1996).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. A. Lindamer, J. B. Lohr, M. J. Harris, and D. V. Jeste, Psychopharmacol. Bull, 33, No. 2, 221–228 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Olsen, T. Hansen, K. D. Jakobsen, et al., BMC Med. Genet., 9, 39 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. L. Payne, Int. Rev. Psychiatry, 15, No. 3, 280–290 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Pedersen and H. Peters, J. Reprod. Fertil., 17, No. 3, 555–557 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. A. Rybaczyk, M. J. Bashaw, D. R. Pathak, et al., BMC Women’s Health, 5, 12 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. R. Stevens, Am. J. Psychiatry, 159, No. 5, 713–719 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. K. Sun and D. L. Alkon, J. Neurosci. Methods, 126, No. 1, 35–40 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. K. Sun and D. L. Alkon, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 316, No. 2, 926–932 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Klochkov
    • 1
  • T. A. Alekhina
    • 1
  • O. I. Prokudina
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Evolutional Genetics, Institute of Cytology and GeneticsSiberian Division of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations