Advertisement

Axiomathes

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 269–291 | Cite as

Transitions Versus Dissociations: A Paradigm Shift in Unconscious Cognition

  • Luis M. Augusto
Article

Abstract

Since Freud and his co-author Breuer spoke of dissociation in 1895, a scientific paradigm was painstakingly established in the field of unconscious cognition. This is the dissociation paradigm. However, recent critical analysis of the many and various reported dissociations reveals their blurred, or unveridical, character. Moreover, we remain ignorant with respect to the ways cognitive phenomena transition from consciousness to an unconscious mode (or the reverse). This hinders us from filling in the puzzle of the unified mind. We conclude that we have reached a Kuhnian crisis in the field of unconscious cognition, and we predict that new models, incorporating partly the relevant findings of the dissociation paradigm—but also of dynamic psychology—, will soon be established. We further predict that some of these models will be largely based on the pairs representation–process and analog–digital.

Keywords

Conscious and unconscious cognition Scientific paradigm Dissociations Transitions Representations–processes Analog–digital Dynamic aspects 

References

  1. Andrewes D (2001) Neuropsychology. From theory to practice. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  2. Arminjon M (2011) The four postulates of Freudian unconscious neurocognitive convergences. Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00125 Google Scholar
  3. Augusto LM (2010) Unconscious cognition: a survey. Adv Cognit Psychol 6:116–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augusto LM (2013) Unconscious representations 1: belying the traditional model of human cognition. Axiomathes 23:645–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augusto LM (2014) Unconscious representations 2: towards an integrated cognitive architecture. Axiomathes 24:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Augusto LM (2016) Lost in dissociation: the main paradigms in unconscious cognition. Conscious Cogn 42:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bar M et al (2001) Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron 29:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargh JA, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Trötschel R (2001) The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:1014–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton JJS (2011) Disorders of higher visual processing. In: Kennard C, Leigh RJ (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, vol 102. Neuro-ophtalmology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 223–261Google Scholar
  10. Bechara A (2005) Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci 8:1458–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benner DG, Evans CS (1984) Unity and multiplicity in hypnosis, commissurotomy, and multiple personality disorder. J Mind Behav 5:423–431Google Scholar
  12. Berlin HA (2011) The neural basis of the dynamic unconscious. Neuropsychoanalysis 13:5–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyer M, Destrebecqz A, Cleeremans A (2005) Processing abstract sequence structure: learning without knowing, or knowing without learning? Psychol Res 69:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Breuer J, Freud S (1895/1955). Studies on hysteria. In: Strachey J (ed) The complete psychological works of Freud, vol II. The Standard edn. (trans: Strachey J). The Hogarth Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Brogaard B (2015) Type 2 blindsight and the nature of visual experience. Conscious Cogn 32:92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bucci W (2000) The need for a “psychoanalytic psychology” in the cognitive science field. Psychoanal Psychol 17:203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buchner A, Wippich W (2000) On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures. Cogn Psychol 40:227–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Campion J, Latto R, Smith YM (1983) Is blindsight an effect of scattered light, spared cortex and near-threshold vision? Behav Brain Sci 6:423–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carruthers P (2000) Phenomenal consciousness: a naturalistic view. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carruthers P (2009) An architecture for dual reasoning. In: Evans JSBT, Frankish K (eds) In two minds: dual processes and beyond. OUP, Oxford, pp 109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Celeghin A, de Gelder B, Tamietto M (2015) From affective blindsight to emotional consciousness. Conscious Cogn 36:414–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chaiken S, Trope Y (eds) (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Cleeremans A (2006) Conscious and unconscious cognition: A graded, dynamic perspective. In: Jing Q et al (eds) Progress in psychological science around the world. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 401–418Google Scholar
  24. Cleeremans A (2014) Connecting conscious and unconscious processing. Cognit Sci 38:1286–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cleeremans A, Dienes Z (2008) Computational models of implicit learning. In: Sun R (ed) The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology. CUP, Cambridge, pp 396–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cowey A (2010) The blindsight saga. Exp Brain Res 200:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Danckert J, Rossetti Y (2005) Blindsight in action: what can the different sub-types of blindsight tell us about the control of visually guided actions? Neurosci Behav Rev 29:1035–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunn JC, Kirsner K (2003) What can we infer from double dissociations? Cortex 39:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Erderlyi MH (1986) Experimental indeterminacies in the dissociation paradigm of subliminal perception. Behav Brain Sci 9:30–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Evans JSBT (2003) In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cognit Sci 7:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fellous J-M, Suri RE (2003) Roles of dopamine. In: Arbib MA (ed) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 361–365Google Scholar
  32. Fendrich R, Wessinger CM, Gazzaniga MS (1992) Residual vision in a scotoma: implications for blindsight. Science 258:1489–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Figner B, Murphy RO (2011) Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. In: Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Kühberger A, Ranyard R (eds) A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research. Psychology Press, New York, pp 163–184Google Scholar
  34. Fodor JA, Pylyshyn Z (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28:3–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foley R (2015) The case for characterizing type-2 blindsight as a genuinely visual-phenomenon. Conscious Cogn 32:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Freud S (1895/1950) A project for a scientific psychology. In: Strachey J (ed) The complete psychological works of Freud, vol I. The standard edn (trans: Strachey J). The Hogarth Press, London, pp 295–397Google Scholar
  37. Freud S (1915/1968) The unconscious. In: Strachey J (ed) The complete psychological works of Freud, vol XIV. The standard edition (trans: Strachey J). The Hogarth Press, London, pp. 166–215Google Scholar
  38. Freud S (1923/1961) The ego and the id. In: Strachey J (ed) The complete psychological works of Freud, vol XIX. The standard edn (trans: Strachey J). The Hogarth Press, London, pp 3–66Google Scholar
  39. Friedenberg J, Silverman G (2006) Cognitive science. an introduction to the study of mind. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Gabbay DM, Woods J (2003) A practical logic of cognitive systems. Vol 1: agenda relevance: a study in formal pragmatics. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. Gazzaniga MS, LeDoux JE (1978) The integrated mind. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR (2002) Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind, 2nd edn. Norton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Gelbard-Sagiv H, Faivre N, Mudrik L, Koch C (2016) Low-level awareness accompanies “unconscious” high-level processing during continuous flash suppression. J Vis 16:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1167/16.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gureckis T, Love B (2005). A critical look at the mechanisms underlying implicit sequence learning. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 869–874Google Scholar
  45. Himmelbach M, Boehme R, Karnath H-O (2012) 20 years later: a second look on DF’s motor behaviour. Neuropsychologia 50:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holender D, Duscherer K (2004) Unconscious perception: the need for a paradigm shift. Percept Psychophys 66:872–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hume D (1739/1978). A treatise of human nature. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58:697–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 49–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Keren G, Schul Y (2009) Two is not always better than one: a critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspect Psychol Sci 4:533–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  53. Lin Z, He S (2009) Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Prog Neurobiol 87:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lin Z, Murray SO (2015) More power to the unconscious: conscious, but not unconscious, exogenous attention requires location variation. Psychol Sci 26:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Merikle PM, Cheesman J (1987) Current status of research on subliminal perception. Adv Consum Res 14:298–302Google Scholar
  56. Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems reviewed. Neuropsychologia 46:774–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Monahan JS (2001) Coloring single Stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing? J Gen Psychol 128:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moors A, De Houwer J (2006) Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychol Bull 132:297–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moutoussis K, Zeki S (2002) The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9527–9532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Overgaard M, Rote J, Mouridsen K, Ramsoy TZ (2006) Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task. Conscious Cogn 15:700–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Hallett M (1994) Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science 263:1287–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reber AS (1992a) An evolutionary context for the cognitive unconscious. Philos Psychol 5:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reber AS (1992b) The cognitive unconscious: an evolutionary perspective. Conscious Cogn 1:93–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reingold EM (2004) Unconscious perception and the classic dissociation paradigm: a new angle? Percept Psychophys 66:882–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reingold EM, Sheridan H (2009) Dissociation methods. In: Bayne T, Cleeremans A, Wilken P (eds) The Oxford companion of consciousness. OUP, Oxford, pp 230–233Google Scholar
  68. Robertson LC, Sagiv N (eds) (2005) Synesthesia: perspectives from cognitive science. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, The PDP Research Group (1986) Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Sahraie A, Hibbard PB, Trevethan CT, Ritchie KL, Weiskrantz J (2010) Consciousness of the first order in blindsight. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:21217–21222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schenk T, McIntosh RD (2010) Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cognit Neurosci 1:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schneider W, Chein JM (2003) Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognit Sci 27:525–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schöner G (2008) Dynamical systems approaches to cognition. In: Sun R (ed) The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology. CUP, Cambridge, pp 101–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scott R, Dienes Z (2010) The metacognitive role of familiarity in artificial grammar learning: Transitions from unconscious to conscious knowledge. In: Efklides A, Misailidi P (eds) Trends and prospects in metacognition research. Springer, New York, pp 37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sergent C, Dehaene S (2004) Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychol Sci 15:720–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shea N, Frith CD (2016) Dual-process theories and consciousness: the case for ‘Type Zero’ cognition. Neurosci Conscious 2016:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sherman JW, Gawronski B, Trope Y (eds) (2014) Dual-process theories of the social mind. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Simons DJ, Hannula DE, Warren DE, Day SW (2007) Behavioral, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological approaches to implicit perception. In: Zelazo PD, Moscovitch M, Thompson E (eds) The Cambridge handbook of consciousness. CUP, Cambridge, pp 207–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Snodgrass M (2004) The dissociation paradigm and its discontents: How can unconscious perception or memory be inferred? Conscious Cogn 13:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Somerville LH, Jones RM, Casey BJ (2010) A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain Cogn 72:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Spunt RP (2015) Dual-process theories in social cognitive neuroscience. In: Toga AW (ed) Brain mapping: an encyclopedic reference, vol 3. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 23:645–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stanovich KE, West RF, Toplak ME (2011) The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Dev Rev 31:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stirling N (1979) Stroop interference: an input and an output phenomenon. Q J Exp Psychol 31:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sun R (2004) Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philos Psychol 17:341–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sun R (2016) Anatomy of mind: exploring psychological mechanisms and processes with the Clarion cognitive architecture. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  89. Thagard P (2005) Mind: introduction to cognitive science, 2nd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  90. Thagard P (2012) Cognitive architectures. In: Frankish K, Ramsey WM (eds) The Cambridge handbook of cognitive science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 50–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Timmermans B, Cleeremans A (2001) Rules vs. statistics in implicit learning of biconditional grammars. In: French MR, Sougné JP (eds) Connectionist models of learning, development and evolution. Springer, London, pp 185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Timmermans B, Cleeremans A (2015) How can we measure awareness? An overview of current methods. In: Overgaard M (ed) Behavioral methods in consciousness research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. To MPS, Regan BC, Wood D, Mollon JD (2011) Vision out of the corner of the eye. Vis Res 51:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tzelgov J, Henik A, Leiser D (1990) Controlling Stroop interference: evidence from a bilingual task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16:760–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Van Bavel JJ, Xiao YJ, Cunningham WA (2012) Evaluation is a dynamic process: moving beyond dual system models. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 6:438–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weiskrantz L (1996) Blindsight revisited. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wermter S, Palmer G, Elshaw M (eds) (2005) Biomimetic neural learning for intelligent robots: intelligent systems, cognitive robotics, and neuroscience. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  98. Windey B, Cleeremans A (2015) Consciousness as a graded and an all-or-none phenomenon: a conceptual analysis. Conscious Cogn 35:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wu W (2014) Against division: consciousness, information, and the visual streams. Mind Lang 29:383–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis M. Augusto
    • 1
  1. 1.MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations