Advertisement

Axiomathes

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 685–697 | Cite as

Cournot’s Notion of Hasard: An Objective Conception of Chance

  • Alessandra MelasEmail author
Original Paper
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

According to Antoine Augustine Cournot, chance events are the result of the intersection between independent causal chains. This coincidental notion of chance is not a new one, but—as Cournot remarks—it comes from Saint Thomas Aquinas, Boethius, and more probably from Jean de La Placette. Such a conception of chance phenomena seems to be very important, not only because it is closely related to the Principle of Causality, but also since it grounds Cournot’s theory of objective probability. Starting from Martin’s work (Probabilités et Critique Philosophique selon Cournot. Vrin, Paris, 1996), the main attempt of this survey is to endorse the idea that Cournot’s coincidental notion of hasard is objective, that is it is ontic (i.e. it comes from some real feature of the world) and it does not depend—in some sense—on our degree of knowledge. In order to do that, a central role in the discussion will be given to the meaning of the independence between the intersecting causal chains and to Cournot’s conception of causation.

Keywords

Chance Independence Global Local Causation Objective 

References

  1. Cournot AA (1843) Exposition de la Théorie des Chances et des Probabilités. Hachette, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Cournot AA (1851) Essai sur les Fondements de nos Connaissances et sur les Caractères de la Critique Philosophique. Hachette, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Cournot AA (1861) Traité de l’Enchaînement des Idées Fondamentales dans les Sciences et dans l’Histoire. Hachette, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Cournot AA (1872) Considérations sur la Marche des Idées et des Événements dans les Temps Modernes. Hachette, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Junkersfeld MJ (1945) The Aristotelian–Thomistic concept of chance. University of Notre Dame, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  6. La Placette J (1714) Traité des jeux de hasard, défendus contre les objections de M. de Joncourt et de quelques autres. Chez Henry Scheurleer, Marchand Libraire prés de la Cour, à l’Enfeigne d’Erafme, La HayeGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin T (1996) Probabilités et Critique Philosophique selon Cournot. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Melas A (2015) An ontic conception of chance in Monod’s non-teleological evolutionary biological theory. In: Hanna P (ed) An antology of philosophical studies, vol 9. Athens Institute of Education and Research, Athens, pp 71–86Google Scholar
  9. Poincaré H (1912) Calcul des Probabilités. Gauthier-Villars, Imprimeur-Libraire, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Salmon WC (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Suppes P (1970) A probabilistic theory of causality. North-Holland Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Storia, Scienze dell’Uomo e della FormazioneUniversity of SassariSassariItaly

Personalised recommendations