Advertisement

Axiomathes

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 157–186 | Cite as

Abduction, Complex Inferences, and Emergent Heuristics of Scientific Inquiry

  • John R. Shook
Original Paper
  • 515 Downloads

Abstract

The roles of abductive inference in dynamic heuristics allows scientific methodologies to test novel explanations for the world’s ways. Deliberate reasoning often follows abductive patterns, as well as patterns dominated by deduction and induction, but complex mixtures of these three modes of inference are crucial for scientific explanation. All possible mixed inferences are formulated and categorized using a novel typology and nomenclature. Twenty five possible combinations among abduction, induction, and deduction are assembled and analyzed in order of complexity. There are five primary categories for sorting these inferential procedures: fallacies, non-scientific procedures, quasi-scientific procedures, scientific procedures, and scientific heuristics.

Keywords

Abduction Deduction Induction Scientific method Heuristics 

References

  1. Aliseda A (2006) Abductive reasoning: logical investigations into discovery and explanation. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliseda A, Beirlaen M (2014) A conditional logic for abduction. Synthese 191:3733–3758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brigandt I (2010) Scientific reasoning is material inference: combining confirmation, discovery, and explanation. Int Stud Philos Sci 24:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buxton R (ed) (1999) From myth to reason? Studies in the development of Greek thought. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Campos D (2011) On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese 180:419–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flach P, Kakas A (eds) (2000) Abduction and induction: essays on their relation and integration. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Gauderis T (2013) Modelling abduction in science by means of a modal adaptive logic. Found Sci 18:611–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gauderis T, Van De Putte F (2012) Abduction of generalizations. Theoria 75:345–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidarzadeh Tofigh (2008) A history of physical theories of comets, from Aristotle to whipple. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lévi-Strauss C (1995) Myth and meaning: cracking the code of culture. Schocken Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Lipton P (2004) Inference to the best explanation, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Magnani L (2010) Abductive cognition: the epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. McMullin E (1992) The inference that makes science. Marquette University Press, MilwaukeeGoogle Scholar
  14. Mikalson J (2010) Greek popular religion in greek philosophy. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morgan K (2000) Myth and philosophy from the presocratics to Plato. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Musgrave A (2012) Deductivism surpassed: or, foxing in its margins? J Gen Philos Sci 43:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Niiniluoto I (2004) Truth-seeking by abduction. In: Stadler F (ed) Induction and deduction in the sciences. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paavola S (2005) Abduction as a logic of discovery: the importance of strategies. Found Sci 9:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park W (2012) Abduction and estimation in animals. Found Sci 17:321–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peirce CS (1934) The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, volume 5. In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (eds) Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Pietarinen A, Bellucci F (2014) New light on Peirce’s conceptions of retroduction, deduction, and scientific reasoning. Int Stud Philos Sci 28:353–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pigliucci M, Boudry M (eds) (2013) Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Pizzi C (2007) Abductive inference and iterated conditionals. In: Magnani L, Ping L (eds) Model-based reasoning in science, technology and medicine. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Psillos S (2009) An explorer upon untrodden ground: Pierce on abduction. In: Woods J, Gabbay D, Hartmam S (eds) Handbook of the history of logic, vol. 10: inductive logic. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–151Google Scholar
  25. Richardson S, Stevens H (eds) (2015) Perspectives on biology after the genome. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  26. Schurz G (2008) Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164:201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shackelford J (2003) William Harvey and the mechanics of the heart. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanford PK (2011) Damn the consequences: projective evidence and the heterogeneity of scientific confirmation. Philos Sci 78:887–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Velázquez-Quesada FR (2015) Reasoning processes as epistemic dynamics. Axiomathes 25:41–60Google Scholar
  30. Wians W (ed) (2009) Logos and Muthos: philosophical essays in Greek literature. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Department, 135 Park HallUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations