Axiomathes

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 483–497 | Cite as

No-Futurism and Metaphysical Contingentism

Original Paper

Abstract

According to no-futurism, past and present entities are real, but future ones are not. This view faces a skeptical challenge (Bourne in Australas J Philos 80(3):359–371 2002; A future for presentism, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006; Braddon-Mitchell in Analysis 64(283):199–203 2004): if no-futurism is true, how do you know you are present? I shall propose a new skeptical argument based on the physical possibility of Gödelian worlds (Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist, Open Court, La Salle, pp. 555–562, 1949). This argument shows that a no-futurist has to endorse a metaphysical contingentist reading of no-futurism, the view that no-futurism is contingently true. But then, the no-futurist has to face a new skeptical challenge: how do you know that you are in a no-futurist world?

Keywords

Metaphysics No-futurism Growing block Metaphysical contingentism Skepticism Time travel 

References

  1. Armstrong DM (1989). Universals: an opinionated introduction, Vol. 25. Westview Press BoulderGoogle Scholar
  2. Bigelow J (1996) Presentism and properties. Philos Perspect 10:35–52Google Scholar
  3. Bourne C (2002) When am I? A tense time for some tense theorists? Australas J Philos 80(3):359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourne C (2006) A future for presentism. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braddon-Mitchell D (2004) How do we know it is now now? Analysis 64(283):199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broad CD (1923) Scientific thought. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Button T (2006) There’s no time like the present. Analysis 66(2):130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Button T (2007) Every now and then, no-futurism faces no sceptical problems. Analysis 67(296):325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmers DJ (1996) The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Dretske F (2003) «How do you know you are not a zombie». Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge. pp. 1–14Google Scholar
  11. Earman J (1995) Recent work on time travel. Time’s arrow today: recent physical and philosophical work on the direction of time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 268–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forrest P (2004) The real but dead past: a reply to Braddon-Mitchell. Analysis 64(284):358–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forrest P (2006) Uniform grounding of truth and the growing block theory: a reply to heath wood. Analysis 66(290):161–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gödel Kurt (1949) A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and ideal. In: Schilpp P (ed) Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist. Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp 555–562Google Scholar
  15. Gödel K (2000) An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einsteins field equations of gravitation. Gen Relativ Gravit 32(7):1409–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heathwood Chris (2005) The real price of the dead past: a reply to Forrest and to Braddon-Mitchell. Analysis 65(287):249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis DK (1986) On the plurality of worlds, vol 322. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Markosian N (2004) «A defense of presentism». Oxford studies in metaphysics, 47Google Scholar
  19. Merricks T (1999) Persistence, parts, and presentism. Noûs 33(3):421–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller K (2009) Defending contingentism in metaphysics. Dialectica 63(1):23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller K (2010) Three routes to contingentism in metaphysics. Philos Compass 5(11):965–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quine WV (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosen G (2006) «The limits of contingency». In: Identity and modality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Sider T (2001) Four-dimensionalism: an ontology of persistence and time. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tallant J (2011) There’s no future in no-futurism. Erkenntnis 74(1):37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tooley M (1997) Time, tense, and causation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman D (1998) Temporary intrinsics and presentism. Metaphysics, The big questions, pp 206–219Google Scholar
  28. Zimmerman D (2008) «The privileged present: defending an ‘A-theory’of time». Contemporary debates in metaphysics, 211–225Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Rennes 1RennesFrance

Personalised recommendations