Advertisement

Axiomathes

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 19–43 | Cite as

Unconscious Representations 2: Towards an Integrated Cognitive Architecture

  • Luis M. Augusto
Original Paper

Abstract

The representational nature of human cognition and thought in general has been a source of controversies. This is particularly so in the context of studies of unconscious cognition, in which representations tend to be ontologically and structurally segregated with regard to their conscious status. However, it appears evolutionarily and developmentally unwarranted to posit such segregations, as, otherwise, artifact structures and ontologies must be concocted to explain them from the viewpoint of the human cognitive architecture. Here, from a by-and-large Classical cognitivist viewpoint, I show why this segregation is wrong, and elaborate on the need to postulate an ontological and structural continuity between unconscious and conscious representations. Specifically, I hypothesize that this continuity is to be found in the symbolic-based interplay between the syntax and the semantics of thought, and I propose a model of human information processing characterized by the integration of syntactic and semantic representations.

Keywords

Human cognitive architecture Classical cognitivism Conscious/unconscious mental representations Syntax and semantics of thought 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the European Social Fund for the post-doctoral fellowship that funded, among others, this work.

References

  1. Anderson JR (1983) The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR (1996) ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. Am Psychol 51:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR (2005) Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture. Cogn Sci 25:313–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anooshian LJ (1989) Effects of attentive encoding on analytic and nonanalytic processing in implicit and explicit retrieval tasks. Bull Psychon Soc 27:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augusto LM (2010) Unconscious knowledge: a survey. Adv Cogn Psychol 6:116–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Augusto LM (2012) Lost in dissociation: behavioral-phenomenological paradigms in unconscious cognition (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  7. Augusto, LM (2013) Unconscious representations 1: belying the traditional model of human cognition. Axiomathes. doi: 10.1007/s10516-012-9206-z
  8. Bray S, O’Doherty J (2007) Neural coding of reward-prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces. J Neurophysiol 97:3036–3045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chomsky N (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  10. Chomsky N (1959) A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35:26–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins AM, Loftus EF (1975) A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 82:407–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Gelder B, Tamietto M, van Boxtel G, Goebel R, Sahraie A, van den Stock J et al (2008) Intact navigation skills after bilateral loss of striate cortex. Curr Biol 18:28–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delamater AR (2012) On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning. Learn Behav 40:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dienes Z, Berry D (1997) Implicit learning: below the subjective threshold. Psychon Bull Rev 4:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol 24:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eccles EC (1992) Evolution of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:7320–7324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eich E (1984) Memory for unattended events: remembering with and without awareness. Mem Cogn 12:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engell AD, Haxby JV, Todorov A (2007) Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1508–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fodor JA (1975) The language of thought. Harvester Press, SussexGoogle Scholar
  20. Fodor JA, Pylyshyn ZW (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28:3–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanna R (2006) Rationality and logic. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Haugeland J (1981) The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. Behav Brain Sci 1:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodges JR, Spatt J, Patterson K (1999) “What” and “how”: evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:9444–9448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inhelder B, Piaget J (1958) The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Basic Books, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knowlton BJ, Mangles JA, Squire LR (1996) A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science 273:1399–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts & Company, EnglewoodGoogle Scholar
  27. Laird JE (2012) The soar cognitive architecture. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenna P, Oh T (2005) Schizophrenic speech. Making sense of bathroots and ponds that fall in doorways. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Merker B (2007) Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: a challenge for science and medicine. Behav Brain Sci 30:63–134Google Scholar
  30. Mitchell CJ, De Houwer J, Lovibond PF (2009) The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behav Brain Sci 32:183–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moray N (1959) Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Q J Exp Psychol 11:56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  34. Newell A (1980) Physical symbol systems. Cogn Sci 4:135–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Packard MG, Knowlton BJ (2002) Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:563–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Papoušek H (1967) Experimental studies of appetitional behavior in human newborns and infants. In: Stevenson HW, Hess EH, Rheingold HL (eds) Early behavior: comparative and developmental approaches. Wiley, New York, pp 249–277Google Scholar
  38. Perruchet P (1985) A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning. Pavlov J Biol Sci 20:163–170Google Scholar
  39. Piaget J (1953) Logic and psychology. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  40. Prawitz D (1965/2006) Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study. Dover, MineolaGoogle Scholar
  41. Preston J, Bishop M (2002) Views into the Chinese room. New essays on Searle and artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Quine WVO (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Reber AS (1992a) An evolutionary context for the cognitive unconscious. Philos Psychol 5:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reber AS (1992b) The cognitive unconscious: an evolutionary perspective. Conscious Cogn 1:93–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reiss JP, Campbell DW, Leslie WD, Paulus MP, Stroman PW, Polimeni JO, Malcolmson KA, Sareen J (2005) The role of the striatum in implicit learning: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroReport 16:1291–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts PL, MacLeod C (1995) Representational consequences of two modes of learning. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 48:296–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Burns B (eds) Cognition and categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 27–48Google Scholar
  48. Schiff ND (2007) Global disorders of consciousness. In: Velmans M, Schneider S (eds) The Blackwell companion to consciousness. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 589–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Searle J (1980) Minds, brains and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3:417–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Searle J (1990) Is the brain’s mind a computer program? Sci Am 262:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shanks DR (2005) Implicit learning. In: Lamberts K, Goldstone R (eds) Handbook of cognition. Sage, London, pp 202–220Google Scholar
  52. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(379–423):623–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spelke E (1994) Initial knowledge: six suggestions. Cognition 50:431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spelke ES, Breinlinger K, Macomber J, Jacobson K (1992) Origins of knowledge. Psychol Rev 99:605–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sun R (2002) Duality of the mind: a bottom-up approach toward cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  56. Sun R (2004) Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philos Psychol 17:341–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Szymanski FK, MacLeod CM (1996) Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory. Conscious Cogn 5:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thelen E, Smith LB (1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press/Bradford, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Uddén J, Folia V, Petersson KM (2010) The neuropharmacology of implicit learning. Curr Neuropharmacol 8:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weaver W (1949) The mathematics of communication. Sci Am 181:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Willis J, Todorov A (2006) First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci 17:592–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood N, Cowan N (1995) The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zebrowitz LA, Hall JA, Murphy NA, Rhodes G (2002) Looking smart and looking good: facial cues to intelligence and their origin. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28:238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyFaculdade de Letras, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations