Axiomathes

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–42 | Cite as

Phenomenal Causality I: Varieties and Variables

Original Paper

Abstract

The empirical literature on phenomenal causality (i.e., the notion that causality can be perceived) is reviewed. In Part I of this two-part series, different potential types of phenomenal causality (launching, triggering, reaction, tool, entraining, traction, braking, enforced disintegration and bursting, coordinated movement, penetration, expulsion) are described. Stimulus variables (temporal gap, spatial gap, spatial overlap, direction, absolute velocity, velocity ratio, trajectory length, radius of action, size, motion type, modality, animacy) and observer variables (attention, eye movements and fixation, prior experience, intelligence, age, culture, psychopathology) that influence phenomenal causality are reviewed. This provides the necessary background for consideration in Part II (Hubbard, in press) of broader questions regarding properties of phenomenal causality, empirical and theoretical connections of phenomenal causality to other perceptual or cognitive phenomena or processes, and potential mechanisms and models of phenomenal causality.

Keywords

Phenomenal causality Launching effect Perception of causality Causal impression Causal representation Intentionality Spatial representation Michotte 

References

  1. Baillargeon R, Kotovsky L, Needham A (1995) The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 79–116Google Scholar
  2. Bassili JN (1976) Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. J Pers Soc Psychol 33:680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beasley NA (1968) The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. Can J Psychol 22:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belanger ND, Desrochers S (2001) Can 6-month old infants process causality in different types of causal events? Br J Develop Psychol 19:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry DS, Springer K (1993) Structure, motion, and preschoolers’ perceptions of social causality. Ecol Psychol 5:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry DS, Misovich SJ, Kean KJ, Baron RM (1992) Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 18:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake R, Shiffrar M (2007) Perception of human motion. Annu Rev Psychol 58:47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blakemore SJ, Boyer P, Pachot-Clouard M, Meltzoff A, Segebarth C, Decety J (2003) The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 13:837–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom P, Veres C (1999) The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition 71:B1–B9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler DM, Thommen E (2000) Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism. Autism 4:147–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyle DG (1960) A contribution to the study of phenomenal causation. Q J Exp Psychol 12:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyle DG (1961) The concept of the ‘radius of action’ in the causal impression. Br J Psychol 52:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown HV, Miles TR (1969) Prior stimulation and the perception of causality. Q J Exp Psychol 21:134–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buehner MJ, Humphreys GR (2010) Causal contraction: spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychol Sci 21:44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castelli F, Happe F, Frith U, Frith C (2000) Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage 12:314–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi H, Scholl BJ (2004) Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality. Percept Psychophys 66:926–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cicchino JB, Aslin RN, Rakison DH (2011) Correspondences between what infants see and know about causal and self-propelled motion. Cognition 118:171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen LB, Amsel G (1998) Precursors to infants’ perception of the causality of a simple event. Infant Behav Dev 21:713–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen LB, Oakes LM (1993) How infants perceive a simple causal event. Dev Psychol 29:421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen LB, Amsel G, Redford MA, Casasola M (1998) The development of infant causal perception. In: Slater A (ed) Perceptual development: visual, auditory, and speech perception in infancy. Psychology Press, East Sussex, pp 167–209Google Scholar
  21. Congiu S, Schlottmann A, Ray E (2010) Unimpaired perception of social and physical causality, but impaired perception of animacy in high functioning children with autism. J Autism Dev Disorders 40:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De sa Teixeira NA, de Oliveira AM, Viegas R (2008) Functional approach to the integration of kinematic and dynamic variables in causal perception: is there a link between phenomenology and behavioral responses? Jpn Psychol Res 50:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Desrochers S (1999) Infants’ processing of causal and noncausal events at 3.5 months of age. J Genetic Psychol 160:294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (1994) Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception 23:253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Falmier O, Young ME (2008) The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality. Am J Psychol 121:473–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher GH (1962) Phenomenal causality in conditions of intrasensory and intersensory stimulation. Am J Psychol 75:321–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fugelsang JA, Roser ME, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS, Dunbar KN (2005) Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Cogn Brain Res 24:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gao T, Newman GE, Scholl BJ (2009) The psychophysics of chasing: a case study in the perception of animacy. Cogn Psychol 59:154–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gao T, McCarthy G, Scholl BJ (2010) The Wolfpack effect: perception of animacy irresistibly influences interactive behavior. Psychol Sci 21:1845–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gelman R, Durgin F, Kaufman L (1995) Distinguishing animates and inanimates: not by motion alone. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 150–184Google Scholar
  31. Gordon IE, Day RH, Stecher EJ (1990) Perceived causality occurs with stroboscopic movement of one or both stimulus elements. Perception 19:17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gruber HE, Fink CD, Damm V (1957) Effects of experience on perception of causality. J Exp Psychol 53:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guski R, Troje NF (2003) Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Percept Psychophys 65:789–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Exp Psychol 57:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hindmarch I (1973) Eye movements and the perception of phenomenal causality. Psychologica Belgica 13:17–23Google Scholar
  36. Houssiadas L (1964) Effects of ‘set’ and intellectual level on the perception of causality. Acta Psychol 22:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hubbard TL (1995a) Cognitive representation of motion: evidence for representational friction and gravity analogues. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hubbard TL (1995b) Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychon Bull Rev 2:322–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hubbard TL (2012) Visual perception of force: comment on White (2012). Psychol Bull 138:616–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hubbard TL (in press) Phenomenal causality II: integration and implication. AxiomathesGoogle Scholar
  41. Hubbard TL, Favretto A (2003) Naive impetus and Michotte’s “Tool Effect:” Evidence from representational momentum. Psychol Res/Psychologische Forschung 67:134–152Google Scholar
  42. Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE (2012) Ratings of causality and force in launching and shattering. Paper presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  43. Hubbard TL, Blessum JA, Ruppel SE (2001) Representational momentum and Michotte’s (1946/1963) “Launching Effect” paradigm. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jansson G (1964) Measurement of eye movements during a Michotte launching event. Scand J Psychol 5:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Joynson RB (1971) Michotte’s experimental methods. Br J Psychol 62:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kanizsa G, Vicario G (1968) The perception of intentional reaction. In: Kanizsa G, Vicario G (eds) Experimental research on perception. University of Trieste, Treiste, IT, pp 71–126Google Scholar
  47. Kerzel D, Bekkering H, Wohlschläger A, Prinz W (2000) Launching the effect: representations of causal movements are influenced by what they lead to. Q J Exp Psychol 53A:1163–1185Google Scholar
  48. Kiritani Y (1999) Perceptual causality in the amodal completion of kinetic structures. Psychol Res/Psychologische Forschung 62:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Klin A (2000) Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and asperger syndrome: the social attribution task. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41:831–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kotovsky L, Baillargeon R (1998) The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants. Cognition 67:311–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kotovsky L, Baillargeon R (2000) Reasoning about collisions involving inert objects in 7.5-month-old infants. Dev Sci 3:344–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leslie AM (1982) The perception of causality in infants. Perception 11:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leslie AM (1984) Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception 13:287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leslie AM (1994) ToMM, ToBy, and agency: core architecture and domain specificity. In: Hirschfield L, Gelman S (eds) Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leslie AM, Keeble S (1987) Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition 25:265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levelt WJM (1962) Motion braking and the perception of causality. In: Michotte A et al (eds) Causalité, permanence et réalité phénoménales [Phenomenal causality, permanence and reality]. Publications Universitaires de Louvain, Studia Psychologica, Louvain, pp 244–258Google Scholar
  57. Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality (trans: Miles T, Miles E). Basic Books, New York (original work published 1946)Google Scholar
  58. Michotte A (1991a) The emotions regarded as functional connections. In: Thinès G, Costall A, Butterworth G (eds) Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 103–116 (original work published 1950)Google Scholar
  59. Michotte A (1991b) The perception of the “tool effect”. In: Thinès G, Costall A, Butterworth G (eds) Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception.Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 87–103 (original work published 1951)Google Scholar
  60. Montpellier G, Nuttin JR (1973) A note on ‘Michotte’s experimental methods’ and ‘Michotte’s ideas’. Br J Psychol 64:287–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morris MW, Peng K (1994) Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:949–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morris MW, Nisbett RE, Peng K (1995) Causal attribution across domains and cultures. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 577–612Google Scholar
  63. Nakamura K (1985) The relationship between the development of the perception of causality and the visual ability of segregation in young children. Jpn J Educ Psychol 33:278–286Google Scholar
  64. Nakamura K (2006) The perception of causality as a kinetic property by young children. Jpn J Psychon Sci 25:35–40Google Scholar
  65. Natsoulas T (1960) Judgments of velocity and weight in a causal situation. Am J Psychol 73:404–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Natsoulas T (1961) Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. Am J Psychol 74:394–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Newman GE, Choi H, Wynn K, Scholl BJ (2008) The origins of causal perception: evidence from postdictive processing in infancy. Cogn Psychol 57:262–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oakes LM (1994) Development of infants’ use of continuity cues in their perception of causality. Dev Psychol 30:869–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Oakes LM, Cohen LB (1990) Infant perception of a causal event. Cogn Dev 5:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Olum V (1956) Developmental differences in the perception of causality. Am J Psychol 69:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parovel G, Casco C (2006) The psychophysical law of speed estimation in Michotte’s causal events. Vision Res 46:4134–4142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parovel G, Casco C, Sinico M (2007) Speed overestimation in intentional reaction. Perception 36(ECVP Abstract Supplement):95Google Scholar
  73. Peng K, Knowles ED (2003) Culture, education, and the attribution of physical causality. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:1272–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Powesland PF (1959) The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. Can J Psychol 13:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rakison DH (2005) A secret agent? How infants learn about the identity of objects in a causal scene. J Exp Child Psychol 91:271–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rakison DH, Krogh L (2012) Does causal action facilitate causal perception in infants younger than 6 months of age? Dev Sci 15:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rakison DH, Poulin-Dubois D (2001) Development origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychol Bull 127:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ray E, Schlottmann A (2007) The perception of social and mechanical causality in young children with ASD. Res Autism Spectr Disord 1:266–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rimé B, Boulanger B, Laubin P, Richir M, Stroobants K (1985) The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement. Motiv Emot 9:241–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rochat P, Morgan R, Carpenter M (1997) Young infants’ sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cogn Dev 12:537–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Roser ME, Fugelsang JA, Dunbar KN, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS (2005) Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology 19:591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sanabria D, Correa A, Lupianez J, Spence C (2004) Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion. Exp Brain Res 157:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saxe R, Carey S (2006) The perception of causality in infancy. Acta Psychol 123:144–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schlottmann A, Anderson NH (1993) An information integration approach to phenomenal causality. Mem Cogn 21:785–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schlottmann A, Shanks DR (1992) Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. Q J Exp Psychol 44A:321–342Google Scholar
  86. Schlottmann A, Surian L (1999) Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception 28:1105–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schlottmann A, Allen D, Linderoth C, Hesketh S (2002) Perceptual causality in children. Child Dev 73:1656–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schlottmann A, Ray E, Mitchell A, Demetriou N (2006) Perceived social and physical causality in animated motion: spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychol 123:112–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schlottmann A, Surian L, Ray ED (2009) Causal perception of action-and-reaction sequences in 8- to 10-month-olds. J Exp Child Psychol 103:87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schlottmann A, Ray ED, Surian L (2012) Emerging perception of causality in action-and-reaction sequences from 4 to 6 months of age: is it domain-specific? J Exp Child Psychol 112:208–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Scholl BJ, Nakayama K (2002) Causal capture: contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychol Sci 13:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Scholl BJ, Nakayama K (2004) Illusory causal crescents: misperceived spatial relations due to perceived causality. Perception 33:455–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci 4:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sekuler AB, Sekuler R (1999) Collisions between moving visual targets: what controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display? Perception 28:415–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Spelke ES, Phillips A, Woodward AL (1995) Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack A (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 44–78Google Scholar
  96. Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) (1995) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  97. Springer K, Meier JA, Berry DS (1996) Nonverbal bases of social perception: developmental change in sensitivity to patterns of motion that reveal interpersonal events. J Nonverbal Behav 20:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Straube B, Wolk D, Chatterjee A (2011) The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study. Exp Brain Res 215:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thommen E, Dumas A, Erskine J, Reymond J (1998) Perception and conceptualization of intentionality in children. Br J Dev Psychol 16:255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tschacher W, Kupper Z (2006) Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophr Bull 32:S106–S112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Umetsu N (2008) The study on the “power” perception in collision events. Jpn J Psychon Sci 26:158–166Google Scholar
  103. Weir S (1978) The perception of motion: Michotte revisited. Perception 7:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. White PA (1988) Causal processing: origins and development. Psychol Bull 104:36–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. White PA (1990) Ideas about causation in philosophy and psychology. Psychol Bull 108:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. White PA (2005) Visual causal impressions in the perception of several moving objects. Vis Cogn 12:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. White PA (2006) The role of activity in visual impressions of causality. Acta Psychol 123:166–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. White PA (2009a) Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. Psychol Rev 116:580–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. White PA (2009b) Property transmission: an explanatory account of the role of similarity information in causal inference. Psychol Bull 135:774–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. White PA (2011a) Judgments about forces in described interactions between objects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 37:979–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. White PA (2011b) Visual impression of forces between objects: entraining, enforced disintegration, and shattering. Visual Cognition 19:635–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. White PA (2011c) Visual impressions of force exerted by one object on another when the objects do not come into contact. Vis Cogn 19:340–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. White PA (2012a) The experience of force: the role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments. Psychol Bull 138:589–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. White PA (2012b) Perceptual impressions and mental simulations of force: reply to Hubbard (2012). Psychol Bull 138:624–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. White PA, Milne A (1997) Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. Am J Psychol 110:573–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. White PA, Milne A (1999) Impressions of enforced disintegration and bursting in the visual perception of collision events. J Exp Psychol Gen 128:499–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. White PA, Milne A (2003) Visual impressions of penetration in the perception of objects in motion. Vis Cogn 10:605–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. White PA, Pennington T (2003) Impressions of pulling in the visual perception of two moving objects by children and adults. Unpublished manuscript, Cardiff UniversityGoogle Scholar
  119. Willatts P (1999) Development of means-ends behavior in young infants: pulling a support to retrieve a distant object. Dev Psychol 35:651–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wolff P (2007) Representing causation. J Exp Psychol Gen 136:82–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wolff P (2008) Dynamics and the perception of causal events. In: Shipley T, Zacks J (eds) Understanding events: how humans see, represent, and act on events. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 555–587Google Scholar
  122. Woodward AL (1999) Infants’ ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors. Infant Behav Dev 22:145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Yela M (1952) Phenomenal causation at a distance. Q J Exp Psychol 4:139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Young ME (1995) On the origin of personal causal theories. Psychon Bull Rev 2:83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Young ME, Falmier O (2008) Launching at a distance: the effect of spatial markers. Q J Exp Psychol 61:1356–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Young ME, Sutherland S (2009) The spatiotemporal distinctiveness of direct causation. Psychon Bull Rev 16:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Young ME, Rogers ET, Beckmann JS (2005) Causal impression: predicting when, not just whether. Mem Cogn 33:320–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations