Ontology, Reference, and the Qua Problem: Amie Thomasson on Existence
- 342 Downloads
I argue that Amie Thomasson’s recent theory of the methodology to be applied to find the truth-conditions for claims of existence faces serious objections. Her account is based on Devitt and Sterelny’s solution to the qua problem for theories of reference fixing; however, such a solution cannot be also applied to analyze existential claims.
KeywordsOntology Existence Reference Amie Thomasson Metaphysics
This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2011. Many thanks to Paisley Livingston and Amie Thomasson for comments on previous versions of this paper.
- Chalmers D, Manley D, Wasserman R (eds) (2009) Metametaphysics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Devitt M (1981) Designation. Columbia University press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Devitt M, Sterelny K (1999) Language and reality, 2nd edn. Blackwell publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Evans G (1973) The causal theory of names. Proc Aristot Soc 47:187–208Google Scholar
- Evans G (1982) The varieties of reference. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Lewis D (1990) Noneism or Allism? Mind 99: 23–31. Reprinted in Lewis D (1999) Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge university press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Sainsbury M (2010) Fiction and fictionalism. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Thomasson A (2009a) Answerable and unanswerable questions. In: Chalmers D, Manley D, Wasserman R (eds) Metametaphysics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar