Axiomathes

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 231–260 | Cite as

Species are Processes: A Solution to the ‘Species Problem’ via an Extension of Ulanowicz’s Ecological Metaphysics

Invited Paper

Abstract

The ‘species problem’ in the philosophy of biology concerns the nature of species. Various solutions have been proposed, including arguments that species are sets, classes, natural kinds, individuals, and homeostatic property clusters. These proposals parallel debates in ecology as to the ontology and metaphysics of populations, communities and ecosystems. A new solution—that species are processes—is proposed and defended, based on Robert Ulanowicz’s metaphysics of process ecology. As with ecological systems, species can be understood as emergent, autocatalytic systems with propensities for centripetality and mutuality in the course of dynamically balancing ascendency (order and persistence) and overhead (randomness and change). The species-as-processes perspective accords with the Ulanowicz’s postulates of process ecology and it can be accommodated by existing theories of species—particularly in a reframing of Richard Boyd’s metaphysics such that species are homeostatic process clusters. Rather than contending that process-based metaphysics is the only, best or true account of species, a pluralist-realist approach is advocated based on the pragmatic principles that are reflected in modern view of species and ecology. If species are understood to be comprised of processes and to be emergent processes themselves, there are important implications for the life sciences, including: animal models in medical and environmental studies, conservation biology, extinction, biodiversity, restoration ecology, and evolutionary biology.

Keywords

Species problem Process philosophy Autocatalysis Centripetality Mutuality Ascendency Overhead Propensity Homeostatic property clusters 

References

  1. Ayala FJ, Arp R (2009) Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Wiley-Blackwell, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickhardt MH, Campbell DT (1999) Emergence. In: Anderson PB, Emmeche C, Finnemann NO, Christensen PV (eds) Downward causation. Aarhus University Press, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw AD (2000) What do we mean by restoration? In: Urbanska KM, Webb NR, Edwards PJ (eds) Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown B, de Laplante K, Peacock K (2011) Philosophy of ecology. Elsevier (North Holland), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Buck RC, Hull DL (1966) The logical structure of the Linnaean hierarchy. Syst Zool 15:97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns J (1988) Increasing diversity by restoring damaged ecosystems. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Caro TM, O’Doherty G (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 13:805–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements FE (1936) Nature and the structure of climax. J Ecol 24:252–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodds W (2009) Laws, theories and patterns in ecology. University of California Press, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donlan CJ, Berger J, Bock CE, Bock JH, Burney DA, Estes JA, Foreman D, Martin PS, Roemer GW, Smith FA, Soule ME, Greene HW (2006) Pleistocene rewilding: an optimistic agenda for twenty-first century conservation. Am Nat 168:660–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elsasser WM (1969) A causal phenomena in physics and biology: a case for reconstruction. Am Sci 57:465–523Google Scholar
  14. Elsasser WM (1981) A form of logic suited for biology? In: Rosen R (ed) Progress in theoretical biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Ereshefsky M (1992) The units of evolution: essays on the nature of species. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Ereshefsky M (1999) Species and the Linnaean hierarchy. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghiselin MT (1966) On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies. Syst Zool 15:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghiselin MT (1969) The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Syst Zool 23:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glass B (1960) Eighteenth-century concepts of the origin of species. Proc Am Philos Soc 104:227–234Google Scholar
  21. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregg JR (1950) Taxonomy, language and reality. Am Nat 84:419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffiths GCD (1974) On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheor 23:85–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hull DL (1976a) Are species really individuals? Syst Zool 25:174–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hull DL (1976b) The ontological status of biological species. In: Butts R, Hintikka J (eds) Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 32. D. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Hull DL (1978) A matter of individuality. Philos Sci 45:335–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hull DL, Ruse M (1998) The philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (2011) http://caat.jhsph.edu/. Accessed 27 April 2011
  29. Keller DR, Golley FB (2000) The philosophy of ecology: from science to synthesis. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  30. Kitcher P (1984) Species. Philos Sci 51:308–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kitts DB, Kitts DJ (1979) Biological species as natural kinds. Philos Sci 46:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolasa J, Pickett STA (1991) Ecological heterogeneity. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Korey K (1984) The essential Darwin. Little, Brown & Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. Lehman H (1967) Are biological species real? Philos Sci 34:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lockwood JA (2004a) Locust: the devastating rise and mysterious disappearance of the insect that shaped the American frontier. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Lockwood JA (2004b) Tales from a species’ crypt. Conserv Pract 5:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lockwood JA (2010) The fate of the Rocky Mountain locust, Melanoplus spretus Walsh: implications for conservation biology. Terr Arthropod Rev 3:129–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lockwood DR, Lockwood JA (1997) Evidence of self-organized criticality in insect populations. Complexity 2:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lovelock J (2000) Gaia: a new look at life on earth. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Maclaurin J, Sterelny K (2008) What is biodiversity?. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews RW, Matthews JR (2009) Insect behavior. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayr E (1976) Is the species a class or an individual? Syst Zool 25:192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCann KS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mishler B, Donoghue M (1982) Species concepts: a case for pluralism. Syst Zool 31:491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parker KA, Seabrook-Davison M, Ewen JG (2010) Opportunities for nonnative ecological replacements in ecosystem restoration. Restor Ecol 18:269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  47. Popper KR (1990) A world of propensities. Thoemmes, BristolGoogle Scholar
  48. Quine WVO (1969) Natural kinds. In: Quine WVO (ed) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Reiners WA, Lockwood JA (2010) Philosophical foundations for the practices of ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Rescher N (2008) Process philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-philosophy/. Accessed 26 April 2011
  51. Rheinberger H-J, Müller-Wille S (2009) Genes. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gene/. Accessed 26 April 2011
  52. Rosenberg A, McShea DW (2007) Philosophy of biology: a contemporary introduction. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Roughgarden J (2004) Evolution’s rainbow: diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruse M (1969) Definitions of species in biology. Brit J Philos Sci 20:97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruse M (1971) The species problem: a reply to Hull. Brit J Philos Sci 22:369–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ruse M (1998) Philosophy of biology. Prometheus, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Serafini A (2001) The epic history of biology. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Shapiro G (1973) Habit and meaning in Peirce’s pragmatism. Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 9:24–40Google Scholar
  59. Shayne CG (2006) Animal models in toxicology. Informa Healthcare, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Sober E (1993) Philosophy of biology. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  61. Sterelny K (1999) Species as ecological mosaics. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Townsend CR, Begon M, Harper JL (2003) Essentials of ecology. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  63. Ulanowicz RE (1995) Ecosystem trophic foundations. In: Patterson BC, Jorgensen SE (eds) Complex ecology: the part-whole relation in ecosystems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  64. Ulanowicz RE (1997) Ecology, the ascendent perspective. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Ulanowicz RE (2001) The organic in ecology. Ludus Vitales 9:183–204Google Scholar
  66. Ulanowicz RE (2005) Fluctuations and order in ecosystem dynamics. Emerg Complex Organ 7:14–20Google Scholar
  67. Ulanowicz RE (2009) A third window: natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  68. Vrba ES (1995) Species as habitat-specific complex systems. In: Lambert DM, Spencer HG (eds) Speciation and the recognition concept: theory and applications. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  69. Wiens JA, Hayward GD, Holthausen RS, Wisdom MJ (2008) Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. BioScience 58:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilmers CC (2004) The role of wolves as a keystone species: Examining the ecological effects and conservation implications of a reintroduced top predator on the scavenger guild, Yellowstone National Park. US Environmental Protection Agency website http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/6782/report/0. Accessed 27 April 2011
  71. Wilson EO (1980) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  73. Wimsatt WC (2000) Emergence as non-aggregativity and the biases of reductionism(s). Found Sci 5:269–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zagzebski LT (2008) On epistemology. Wadsworth, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  75. Zorach AC, Ulanowicz RE (2003) Quantifying the complexity of flow networks: how many roles are there? Complexity 8:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations