Axiomathes

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 393–437 | Cite as

Relational Science: A Synthesis

Invited Paper

Abstract

A synthesis of the two primary theory structures in Robert Rosen’s relational complexity, (1) relational entailment mapping based on category theory as described by Rosen and Louie, and (2) relational holism based on modeling relations, as described by Kineman, provides an integral foundation for relational complexity theory as a natural science and analytical method. Previous incompatibilities between these theory structures are resolved by re-interpreting Aristotle’s four causes, identifying final and formal causes as relations with context. Category theory is applied to introduce contextual entailment algebra needed to complete the synthesis. The modeling relation is represented as a recursive four-cause hierarchy, which is a unit of both whole and part analysis (a ‘holon’) that relates realized and contextual domains of nature as complementary inverse entailments between structure and function. Context is a non-localized domain of distributed potentials (models) for existence, as contrasted with the realized domain of localized interactive and measurable events. Synthesis is achieved by giving modeling relations an algebraic form in category theory and by expanding relational analysis to include contextual entailments. The revised form of analysis is applied and demonstrated to examine Rosen’s M-R diagram, showing that structure–function relations imply adaptive interaction with the environment, and that contextual relations imply three forms of the M-R entailment corresponding with the generally known three forms of life; Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukaryota, which can be represented by their holon diagrams. The result of this synthesis is a consistent foundation for relational science that should have important implications in many disciplines.

Keywords

Aristotelian causality Category theory Contextual entailment Holarchy Holon Life itself Modeling relation Non-duality Complexity Robert Rosen Structure and function Theoretical ecology Relational biology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to acknowledge those on two sides of the planet who contributed insights, support, patience, and encouragement over the many years it required to develop and complete this work. The list of those I have to thank is too daunting to reproduce: I hope the result itself rewards their faith.

References

  1. Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity. Bantam, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  2. Hameroff S, Penrose R (1996) Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. Conscious Stud 2(1):36–53Google Scholar
  3. Hutchinson GE (1953) The niche: an abstractly inhabited hyper-volume. Proc Acad Natl Sci 105(4):1–12Google Scholar
  4. Kineman JJ (2007) Modeling relations in nature and eco-informatics: a practical application of Rosennean complexity. Chem Biodivers 4(10):2436–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kineman JJ (2008) Fundamentals of relational complexity theory. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the international society for the system sciences, Toronto, 2008Google Scholar
  6. Kineman JJ (2009a) Relational self-similar space-time cosmology revisited. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the international society for the systems science, Waterloo, 2010Google Scholar
  7. Kineman JJ (2009b) Relational theory and ecological niche modeling. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences, Brisbane, 2009Google Scholar
  8. Kineman JJ, Kumar KA (2007) Primary natural relationship: Bateson, Rosen, and the Vedas. Kybernetes 36(7/8):1055–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kineman JJ, Banathy BA, Rosen J (2007) The atomistic structure of relationship. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences, Tokyo, 2007Google Scholar
  10. Koestler A (1967) The ghost in the machine. Hutchinson, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Koestler A (1978) Janus: a summing up. Hutchinson, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Louie A (2009) More than life itself: a synthetic continuation in relational biology. Ontos Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  13. Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoieses and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel Publishing, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehta R (1970) Call of the Upanishads. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. Muller M (ed) (1884) The Upanishads, part 2 of 2, vol 15. Sacred books of the East. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosen R (1971) The polarity between structure and function. Dialogue discussion paper. Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions. Special Collections, Box 77, Davidson Library. University of California, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosen R (1978) Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems. North-Holland series in general research systems. North-Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosen R (1985) Anticipatory systems: philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosen R (1991) Life itself: a comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. Complexity in ecological systems series. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosen R (1999) Essays on life itself. Complexity in ecological systems series. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosen J, Kineman JJ (2004) Anticipatory systems and time: a new look at Rosennean complexity. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the international society for the system sciences, Asilomar, 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystem Sciences Division, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences (CIRES)University of Colorado, UCB-216BoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations