, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 213–234 | Cite as

Nominalism and Idealism

Invited Paper


The article considers, in a historical setting, the links between varieties of nominalism—the extreme nominalism of the Quine-Goodman variety and the trope nominalism current today—and types of idealism. In so doing arguments of various twentieth century figures, including Husserl, Bradley, Russell, and Sartre, as well as a contemporary attack on relations by Peter Simons are critically examined. The paper seeks to link the rejection of realism about universals with the rejection of a mind-independent “world”—in short, linking nominalism with idealism.


Nominalism Predication Tropes Relations Exemplification Complexes Particulars Abstraction Universals Bundles Diversity Identity 


  1. Bradley FH (1969) Appearance and reality. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Goodman N (1951) The structure of appearance. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Hochberg H (1978) Thought, fact, and reference: the origins and ontology of logical atomism. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  4. Hochberg H (1988) A refutation of moderate nominalism. Australasian J Phil 66(2):188–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hochberg H (1992) Troubles with tropes. Phil Stud 67(2):193–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hochberg H (2002) From logic to ontology: some problems of predication, negation and possibility, a companion to philosophical logic (ed. D. Jacquette). Blackwell, Oxford, pp 181–192Google Scholar
  7. Husserl E (1970) Logical investigations (trans. J. N. Findlay), vol 1. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Marc-Wogau K (1936) Inhalt und Umfang des Begriffs. Almquist & Wiksells, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  9. Moore GE (1900/1901) Identity. Proc Aristotelian Soc 1:121–145Google Scholar
  10. Overbye D (2002) Peering through the gates of time. The New York Times, March, 12Google Scholar
  11. Russell BAW (1927) The analysis of matter. Harcourt Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Russell BAW (1940) An inquiry into meaning and truth. George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Russell BAW (1948) Human knowledge: its scope and limits. George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Russell BAW (1956) The principles of mathematics. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Sartre JP (1956) Being and nothingness, (trans. H. Barnes). Philosophical Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Segelberg I (1999) Properties. In: Three essays in phenomenology and ontology (trans. H. Hochberg &. S. Hochberg), Thales, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  17. Simons P (2010) Relations and truthmaking. Aristotelian Soc Suppl Vol 10:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. von Aster E (1913) Prinzipien der Erkenntnislehre. Quelle & Meyer, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  19. Wetterström T (1995) Om Ivar Segelberg, medvetandet och världen. Filosofiska Tidskrift 4:5–25, 10 (Trans. Manuscript, H. Malmgren)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations