Axiomathes

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 229–266 | Cite as

A Biosemiotic and Ecological Approach to Music Cognition: Event Perception Between Auditory Listening and Cognitive Economy

  • Mark Reybrouck
Article

Abstract

This paper addresses the question whether we can conceive of music cognition in ecosemiotic terms. It claims that music knowledge must be generated as a tool for adaptation to the sonic world and calls forth a shift from a structural description of music as an artifact to a process-like approach to dealing with music. As listeners, we are observers who construct and organize our knowledge and bring with us our observational tools. What matters is not merely the sonic world in its objective qualities, but the world as perceived. In order to make these claims operational we can rely on the ecological concept of coping with the sonic world and the cybernetic concepts of artificial and adaptive devices. Listeners, on this view, are able to change their semantic relations with the sonic world through functional adaptations at the level of sensing, acting and coordinating between action and perception. This allows us to understand music in functional terms of what it affords to us and not merely in terms of its acoustic qualities. There are, however, degrees of freedom and constraints which shape the semiotization of the sonic world. As such we must consider the role of event perception and cognitive economy: listeners do not perceive the acoustical environment in terms of phenomenological descriptions but as ecological events.

Keywords

adaptation and adaptive control cognitive economy coping behavior ecosemiotics enactive and experiential cognition epistemic control system event perception listener–environment interaction musical epistemology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annett, J. 1996‘On Knowing How to do Things: A Theory of Motor Imagery’Cognitive Brain Research36569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbib, M. 1981

    ‘Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control’

    Brooks, V. eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 1, The Nervous System, Vol. 2, Motor ControlAmerican Physiological SocietyBethesda14491480
    Google Scholar
  3. Balzano, G. 1986

    ‘Music Perception as Detection Of Pitch-Time Constraints’

    McCabe, V.Balzano, G. eds. Event Cognition: An Ecological PerspectiveLawrence ErlbaumHillsdale, NJ, London217233
    Google Scholar
  4. Bamberger, J. 1991The Mind Behind the Musical EarHow Children Develop Musical Intelligence. Harvard University PressCambridge, MA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, J. 1984

    ‘Cognition of Complex Events: Visual Scenes and Music’

    Crozier, W.Chapman, A. eds. Cognitive Processes in the Perception of ArtNorth-HollandAmsterdam, New York, Oxford225251
    Google Scholar
  6. Bateson G. 1978(1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, London, Toronto, Sydney, New York, Granada: Paladin.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, B. 1987

    ‘Metaphors, Cognition and Artificial Intelligence’

    Haskell, R.E. eds. Cognition and Symbolic Structures: The Psychology of Metaphoric TransformationAblex publishing CorporationNorwood930
    Google Scholar
  8. Berthoz, A. 1997Le sens du mouvementOdile JacobParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Berthoz A. (1999). ‘Le secret du geste’. in A. Berthoz (ed.). Le cerveau et le mouvement. Comment nos gestes construisent notre pensée, Science & Vie, Hors Série, 204, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
  10. Besson, M., Schon, D. 2001‘Comparison Between Language and Music’Annals of the New York Academy of Science930232258Google Scholar
  11. Bransford, J., McCarrell, N. 1977

    ‘A Sletch of a Cognitive Approach to Comprehension: Some Thought About Understanding What it Means to Comprehend’

    Johnson-Laird, P.Wason, P. eds. Thinking. Readings in Cognitive ScienceCambridge University PressCambridge, London, New York, Melbourne377399
    Google Scholar
  12. Brier, S. 1999a

    ‘What is a Possible Ontological and Epistemological Framework for a True Universal ‘Information Science’? The Suggestion of a Cybersemiotics’

    Hofkirchner, W. eds. The Quest for a Unified Theory of Information. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Foundations of Information ScienceGordon and Breach PublishersAmsterdam7999
    Google Scholar
  13. Brier, S. 1999b‘Biosemiotics and the Foundations of Cybersemiotics’Semiotica127169198Google Scholar
  14. Brier, S. 2000a‘Biosemiotics as a Possible Bridge Between Embodiment in Cognitive Semantics and the Motivation Concept of Animal Cognition in Ethology’Cybernetics & Human Knowing75775Google Scholar
  15. Brier, S. 2000b‘Trans-Scientific Frameworks of Knowing: Complementarity Views of the Different Types of Human Kowledge’Systems Research and Behavioral Science17433458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruner, J, Goodnow, J., Austin, G. 1956A Study of ThinkingWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Brunner, R. 1998

    ‘Univers de genèse, univers de réception’

    Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParis637648
    Google Scholar
  18. Bystřina, I. 1983‘Kodes und Kodewandel’Zeitschrift für Semiotik5122Google Scholar
  19. Cariani P. (1989). On the Design of Devices with Emergent Semantic Functions, State University of New York, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
  20. Cariani, P. 1991

    ‘Some Epistemological Implications of Devices Which Construct their Own Sensors and Effectors’

    Varela, F.Bourgine, P. eds. Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems, Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Artificial LifeMIT PressCambridge, MA484493
    Google Scholar
  21. Cariani P. (1998a). ‘Epistemic Autonomy Through Adaptive Sensing’. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE ISIC/CIRA/ISAS Joint Conference, Gathersburg, MD. September 12–17, 1998, pp. 718–723.Google Scholar
  22. Cariani, P. 1998b‘Life’s Journey Through the Semiosphere’Semiotica120243257Google Scholar
  23. Cariani P. (2001a). ‘Cybernetic Systems and the Semiotics of Translation’. In: Petrilli S. (ed). Lo Stesso Altro. Athanor: Filosofia, Arte, Letteratura, Semiotica, Filosofia, Vol. XII(4). Meltemi, Roma, pp. 256 – 273.Google Scholar
  24. Cariani, P. (2001b). ‘Symbols and Dynamics in the Brain’. Biosystems 60(1–3). 59–83. Special issue on “Physics and evolution of symbols and codes”.Google Scholar
  25. Crammond, D. 1997‘Motor Imagery: Never in Your Wildest Dream’Trends in Neurosciences205457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis Ph., Hersh R. 1990(1981). The Mathematical Experience, Frome, London: Butler & Tanner.Google Scholar
  27. Decety, J. 1996‘Do Imagined Actions Share the Same Neural Substrate?’Cognitive Brain Research38793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Deecke, L. 1996‘Planning, Preparation, Execution, and Imagery of Volitional Action’Cognitive Brain Research35964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Delalande, F. 1984La musique est un jeu d’enfantBuchet/ChastelParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Dewey J. 1958 (1934). Art as Experience, New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
  31. Dougherty, J. 1978‘Salience and Relativity in Classification’American Ethnologist56680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dubois D. (1991). ‘Catégorisation et cognition: “10 ans après”, une évaluation des concepts de Rosch’. In: Dubois D. (ed). Sémantique et cognition. Catégories, prototypes, typicalité. Editions du CNRS, Paris, pp. 34–54.Google Scholar
  33. Edelman, G. 1989The Remembered Present. A biological Theory of ConsciousnessBasic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Emmeche, C. 2001‘Does a Robot have an Umwelt? Reflections on the Qualitative Biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll’Semiotica134653693Google Scholar
  35. Fink, R. 2001

    ‘Going Flat: Post-Hierarchical Music Theory and the Musical Surface’

    Cook, N.Everist, M. eds. Rethinking MusicOxford University PressNew York102137
    Google Scholar
  36. Fleagle, J. 1999Primate Adaptation and EvolutionAcademic PressSan DiegoGoogle Scholar
  37. Gaser, C., Schlaug, G. 2003‘Brain Structures Differ Between Musicians and Non-Musicians’The Journal of Neuroscience892409245Google Scholar
  38. Gibson, J. 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual SystemsAllen & UnwinLondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Gibson, E. 1969Principles of Perceptual Learning and DevelopmentAppleton-Century-CroftsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Gibson, J. 1979The Ecological Approach to Visual PerceptionHoughton Mifflin CompanyBoston, Dallas, Geneva, Illinois, Hopewell, New Jersey, Palo Alto, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Gibson, J. (1982). in J. Gibson, E. Reed and R. Jones (eds.). Reasons for Realism: Selected Essays of James, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Godøy, R.I. 1997

    ‘Knowledge in Music Theory by Shapes of Musical Objects and Sound producing Actions’

    Leman, M. eds. Music, Gestalt and Computing. Studies in Cognitive and Systematic MusicologySpringer VerlagBerlin, Heidelberg106110
    Google Scholar
  43. Godøy, R.I. 1999

    ‘Cross-Modality and Conceptual Shapes in Music Theory’

    Zannos, I. eds. Music and Signs, Semiotic and Cognitive Studies in MusicASCO Art & ScienceBratislava8598
    Google Scholar
  44. Godøy, R.I. 2001

    ‘Imagined Action, Excitation, and Resonance’

    Godøy, R.I.Jørgensen, H. eds. Musical ImagerySwets & ZeitlingerLisse, Abingdon, Exton, Tokyo237250
    Google Scholar
  45. Godøy R.I. (2001b). ‘Simple Yet Complex’. in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Meeting of the FWO Resarch Society on Foundations of Music Research. Ghent March 2, pp.11–19.Google Scholar
  46. Gray, P, Krause, B., Atema, J., Krumhansl, C., Baptista, L. 2001‘Biology and MusicThe Music of Nature’. Science2915254Google Scholar
  47. Handel, S. 1989ListeningAn Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. MIT PressCambridge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Hargreaves, D. 1986The Developmental Psychology of MusicCambridge University PressCambridge, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  49. Hertz, H. 1956(1894). Principles of Mechanics, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  50. Hoffmeyer, J. 1997a‘Biosemiotics: Towards a New Synthesis in Biology’European Journal for Semiotic Studies923552376Google Scholar
  51. Hoffmeyer, J. 1997bSigns of Meaning in the UniverseIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  52. Hoffmeyer, J. 1998‘Semiosis and Biohistory: A Reply’Semiotica120455482Google Scholar
  53. Jackendoff, R. 1988

    ‘Conceptual Semantics’

    Eco, U.Santambrogio, M.Violi, P. eds. Meaning and Mental RepresentationsIndiana University PressBloomington and Indianapolis8197
    Google Scholar
  54. James W. 1912(1976). Essays in Radical Empiricism, Cambridge, Ma, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Jeannerod, M. 1994‘The Representing Brain: Neural Correlates of Motor Intention and Imagery’Behavioural Brain Sciences17187202Google Scholar
  56. Jiranek, J. 1998

    ‘Réflexions sur les constances de sémantique musicale’

    Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParis6065
    Google Scholar
  57. Johnson, M. 1987The Body in the MindThe Bodily Basis of MeaningImaginationGoogle Scholar
  58. Klaus, G. 1972Kybernetik und ErkenntnistheorieDeutscher Verlag der WissenschaftenBerlinGoogle Scholar
  59. Kon, J. 1998

    ‘Einige Bemerkungen über das Problem der musikalischen Universalien’

    Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParis197205
    Google Scholar
  60. Kull, K. 1998a‘On semiosis, Umwelt, and Semiosphere’Semiotica120299310Google Scholar
  61. Kull, K. 1998b‘Semiotic Ecology: Different Natures in the Semiosphere’Sign System Studies26344371Google Scholar
  62. Kull K. (2001). ‘Jakob von Uexküll: A Paradigm for Biology and Semiotics’. Semiotica 134(1/4) (Special Issue).Google Scholar
  63. Lagerspetz, K. 2001‘Jakob von Uexküll and the Origins of Cybernetics’Semiotica134643651Google Scholar
  64. Lakoff, G. 1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the MindUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  65. Lakoff, G. 1988

    ‘Cognitive Semantics’

    Eco, U.Santambrogio, M.Violi, P. eds. Meaning and Mental RepresentationsIndiana University PressBloomington119154
    Google Scholar
  66. Lakoff G., Nuñez R.E. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From. How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books. New York.Google Scholar
  67. Langacker, R. 1987Foundations of Cognitive GrammarStanford University PressStanford CAVol. 1Google Scholar
  68. Lidov, D. 1987‘Mind and Body in Music’Semiotica666997Google Scholar
  69. Lombardo, T.J. 1987The Reciprocity of Perceiver and EnvironmentLawrence ErlbaumHillsdale, NJ, LondonThe Evolution of James J. Gibson’s Ecological PsychologyGoogle Scholar
  70. Luhmann, N. 1990Essays on Self-ReferenceColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Luhmann, N. 1995Social SystemsStanford University PressStanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  72. Marconi, L. 1998

    ‘Universals in Music and Musical Experiences’

    Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParis657666
    Google Scholar
  73. Martindale, C., Moore, K. 1989‘Relationship of Musical Preference to Collative, Ecological, and Psychophysical Variables’Music Perception6431446Google Scholar
  74. Martinelli, D. (2002). How Musical is a Whale? Towards a Theory of Zoömusicology. Acta Semiotica Fennica XIII, Approaches to Musical Semiotics 3.Google Scholar
  75. Maser, S. 1977

    ‘Arten der Superzeichenbildung’

    Posner, R.Reinecke, H.P. eds. Zeichenprozesse Semiotische Forschung in den EinzelwissenschaftenAthenaionWiesbaden83107
    Google Scholar
  76. Maturana, H. 1978

    ‘Biology of language: the Epistemology of Reality’

    Miller, G.Lenneberg, E. eds. Psychology and Biology of Language and ThoughtAcademic PressNew York2746
    Google Scholar
  77. Maturana, H., Varela, F. 1980Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the LivingReidelLondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Mazet, C. 1991

    ‘Fonctionnalité dans l’organisation catégorielle’

    Dubois, D. eds. Sémantique et cognition Catégories, prototypes, typicalitéEditions du CNRSParis89100
    Google Scholar
  79. Mazzola, G. 2002The Topos of Music. Geometric Logic of Concepts, Theory, and PerformanceBirkhäuserBaselGoogle Scholar
  80. McAdams S. (1984). ‘The Auditory Image: A Metaphor for Musical and Psychological Research on Auditory Organization’. In: Crozier W.R., Chapman A.J. (ed). Cognitive Processes in the Cognition of Art. Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, pp. 289–323.Google Scholar
  81. McAdams, S. 1993

    ‘Recognition of Sound Sources and Events’

    McAdams, S.Bigand, E. eds. Thinking in Sound. The Cognitive Psychology of Human AuditionClarendon PressOxford146198
    Google Scholar
  82. McCulloch W, S. 1946‘A Heterarchy of Values Determined by the Topology of Nervous Nets’Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics78993Google Scholar
  83. McCulloch, R. 1989Collected Works of Warren McCullochIntersystems PublicationsSalinas, CAVols. 1–4Google Scholar
  84. McDermott J. 1968(1911). The Writings of William James. A Comprehensive Edition, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  85. Mead, G. 1936Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth CenturyUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  86. Meystel, A. 1998‘Multiresolutional Umwelt: Towards a Semiotics of Neurocontrol’Semiotica120343380Google Scholar
  87. Michaels C., Carello C. (1981). Direct Perception, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  88. Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. 1998Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParisGoogle Scholar
  89. Neisser, U. 1967Cognitive PsychologyAppleton-Century-CroftsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. Neisser, U. eds. 1987Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in CategorizationCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  91. Nelson, K. 1977

    ‘Some Evidence for the Cognitive Primacy of Categorization and its Functional Basis’

    Johnson-Laird, P.Wason, P. eds. ThinkingReadings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge University PressCambridge, London, New York, Melbourne223238
    Google Scholar
  92. Normet, L. 1998

    ‘Universals and Their Subdivisions’

    Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParis191195
    Google Scholar
  93. Nöth, W. 1998‘Ecosemiotics’Sign System Studies26332343Google Scholar
  94. Padilla, A. 1998

    ‘Les universaux en musique et la définition de la musique’

    Miereanu, C.Hascher, X. eds. Les Universaux en musique, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur la signification musicalePublications de la SorbonneParis219230
    Google Scholar
  95. Paillard, J. 1994a

    ‘La Conscience’

    Richelle, M.Requin, J.Robert, M. eds. Traité de psychologie expérimentale 2Presses Universitaires de FranceParis639684
    Google Scholar
  96. Paillard, J. 1994b

    ‘L’intégration sensori-motrice et idéo-motrice’

    Richelle, M.Requin, J.Robert, M. eds. Traité de psychologie expérimentale 1Presses Universitaires de FranceParis925996
    Google Scholar
  97. Pask, G. 1961aAn Approach to CyberneticsScience Today Series. Harper and BrothersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  98. Pask G. (1961b). The Cybernetics of Evolutionary Processes and of Self-Organizing Systems, Namur.Google Scholar
  99. Pask, G. 1992

    ‘Different Kinds of Cybernetics’

    Vijver, G. eds. New Perspectives on Cybernetics: Self-Organization, Autonomy and ConnectionismKluwer AcademicDordrecht1131
    Google Scholar
  100. Pattee, H. 1982‘Cell Psychology: An Evolutionary View of the Symbol-Matter Problem’Cognition and Brain Theory5325341Google Scholar
  101. Pattee, H. 1985

    ‘Universal Principles of Measurement and Language Functions in Evolving Systems’

    Casti, J.Karlqvist, A. eds. Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical ApproachesSpringer VerlagBerlin268281
    Google Scholar
  102. Pattee, H. 1995‘Evolving Self-Reference: Matter, Symbols, and Semantic Closure’Communication and Cognition – AI12928Google Scholar
  103. Piaget, J. 1967Biologie et connaissance Essai sur les relations entre les régulations organiques et les processus cognitifsGallimardParisGoogle Scholar
  104. Piaget, J. 1977

    ‘Foreword’

    Gruber, H.Vonèche, J. eds. The Essential PiagetRoutledge and Kegan PaulLondon
    Google Scholar
  105. Reybrouck, M. 1997

    ‘Gestalt Concepts and Music

    Limitations, Possibilities’. Leman, M. eds. Music, Gestalt and Computing. Studies in Cognitive and Systematic MusicologySpringerBerlin5769
    Google Scholar
  106. Reybrouck, M. 2001a‘Biological Roots of Musical Epistemology: Functional Cycles, Umwelt, and Enactive Listening’Semiotica134599633Google Scholar
  107. Reybrouck, M. 2001b

    ‘Musical Imagery Between Sensory Processing and Ideomotor Simulation’

    Godøy, R.I.Jörgensen, H. eds. Musical ImagerySwets & ZeitlingerLisse117136
    Google Scholar
  108. Reybrouck, M. (2001c). ‘The Listener as an Adaptive Device: an Ecological and Biosemiotic Approach to Musical Semantics’. Lecture delivered at ICMS 7. Seventh International Congress in Musical Signification. Imatra, June 7–10, 2001.Google Scholar
  109. Reybrouck, M. 2004

    ‘Musical Creativity Between Symbolic Modelling and Perceptual Constraints: the Role of Adaptive Behaviour and Epistemic Autonomy’

    Deliège, I.Wiggins, G. eds. Musical Creativity: Current Research in Theory and PracticePsychology PressHove
    Google Scholar
  110. Rosch, E. 1977

    ‘Classification of Real-World Objects: Origins and Representations in Cognition’

    Johnson-Laird, P.Wason, P. eds. ThinkingReadings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge University PressCambridge London New York Melbourne212222
    Google Scholar
  111. Rosch, E. 1978

    ‘Principles of Categorization’

    Rosch, E.Lloyd, B. eds. Cognition and CategorizationErlbaumHillsdale2747
    Google Scholar
  112. Rosch, E.Lloyd, B. eds. 1978Cognition and CategorizationErlbaumHillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  113. Rosch, E, Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., Boyes-Braem, P. 1976‘Basic Objects in Natural Categories’Cognitive Psychology8382439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Rosen, R. 1978Fundamentals of Measurement and Representation of Natural SystemsNorth-HollandNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  115. Sebeok, T. 1998‘The Estonian connection’Sign System Studies262038Google Scholar
  116. Sebeok, T.Umiker-Sebeok, J. eds. 1992BiosemioticsMouton de GruyterBerlinGoogle Scholar
  117. Shaw, R., Hazelett, W. 1986

    ‘Schemas in Cognition’

    McCabe, V.Balzano, G. eds. Event Cognition: An Ecological PerspectiveErlbaumHillsdale, NJ, London4558
    Google Scholar
  118. Shaw, R., Pittenger, J. 1978

    ‘Perceiving change’

    Pick, H.L.Salzman, E. eds. Modes of Perceiving and Processing InformationErlbaum HillsdaleNew Jersey
    Google Scholar
  119. Shaw, R, Flascher, O., Mace, W. 1996

    ‘Dimensions of Event Perception’

    Prinz, W.Bridgeman, B. eds. Handbook of Perception and Action, PerceptionAcademic PressLondon, San Diego, New York, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto345395Vol. 1
    Google Scholar
  120. Shepard, R.N. 1984‘Ecological Constraints on Internal Representation: Resonant Kinematics of Perceiving, Imagining, Thinking, and Dreaming’Psychological Review91417447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Smoliar, S. 1995‘Parsing, Structure, Memory and Affect’Journal of New Music Research242133Google Scholar
  122. Varela, F, Thompson, E., Rosch, E. 1991The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human ExperienceMIT PressCambridge, Ma LondonGoogle Scholar
  123. von Foerster H. ed. (1974). Cybernetics of Cybernetics. Illinois University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  124. Foerster, H. 1984Observing SystemsIntersystems PressSeaside, CAGoogle Scholar
  125. Glasersfeld, E. 1991Radical Constructivism in Mathematics EducationKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht, Boston, LondonGoogle Scholar
  126. Glasersfeld, E. 1995a

    ‘Einführung in die radikalen Konstruktivismus’

    Watzlawick, P. eds. Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glaubenPiperMünchen1638
    Google Scholar
  127. Glasersfeld, E. 1995bRadical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and LearningThe Falmer PressLondon, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  128. Uexküll, J. 1921Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere2SpringerBerlinGoogle Scholar
  129. Uexküll, J. 1928Theoretische Biologie2SpringerBerlinGoogle Scholar
  130. von Uexküll, J. 1957(1934). ‘A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Men. A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds’. in C. Schiller (ed.). Instinctive Behavior. The Development of a Modern Concept, New York: International Universities Press, pp. 5–80.Google Scholar
  131. von Uexküll, J. 1982(1940). ‘The Theory of Meaning’. Semiotica 42, 25–82.Google Scholar
  132. Uexküll, Th. 1986

    ‘From Index to Icon. A Semiotic Attempt at Interpreting Piaget’s Developmental Theory’

    Bouissac, P.Herzfeld, M.Posner, R. eds. Iconicity. Essays on the Nature of Culture. Festschrift für Th. A SebeokStauffenburg VerlagTübingen119140
    Google Scholar
  133. Werner, H. 1961Comparative Psychology of Mental DevelopmentScience EditionsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  134. Werner, H., Kaplan, B. 1963Symbol Formation. An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of ThoughtJohn WileyNew York, London, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  135. Wiener, N. 1961(1948). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  136. Wittmann, M. 1999‘Time Perception and Temporal Processing Levels of the Brain’Chronobiology International161732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Wittmann, M. and E. Pöppel: 1999–2000, ‘Temporal Mechanisms of the Brain as Fundamentals of Communication – with Special Reference to Music Perception and Performance’. Musicae Scientiae 13–28 (Special Issue).Google Scholar
  138. Ziemke, T., Sharkey, N. 2001‘A Stroll Through the World of Robots and Animals: Applying Jakob von Uexküll’s Theory of Meaning to Adaptive Robots and Artificial life’Semiotica134701746Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Reybrouck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations