Reliable robotic handovers through tactile sensing

  • A. Gómez Eguíluz
  • I. Rañó
  • S. A. Coleman
  • T. M. McGinnity


Joint manipulation and object exchange are common in many everyday scenarios. Although they are trivial tasks for humans, they are still very challenging for robots. Existing approaches for robot-to-human object handover assume that there is no fault during the transfer. However, unintentional perturbation forces can be occasionally applied to the object, resulting in the robot and the object being damaged, for example by being dropped. In this paper we present a novel approach to handover objects in a reliable manner while ensuring the safety of the robot and the object. Relying on tactile sensing, the system uses an effort controller to adapt the grasp forces in the presence of perturbations. Moreover, the proposed approach identifies a perturbation being applied on the object. When a perturbation event is detected, the algorithm classifies the direction of the pulling forces to decide whether to release it or not. The reliable handover system was implemented using a Shadow Robot hand equipped with BioTAC tactile sensors. Our results show that the system correctly adapts to the forces applied on the object to maintain the grasp and only releases the object if the human receiver pulls in the right direction.


Reliable object handovers Robotic handovers Tactile sensing Dexterous robot 



  1. Aleotti, J., Micelli, V., & Caselli, S. (2014). An affordance sensitive system for robot to human object handover. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(4), 653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohren, J., Rusu, R. B., Jones, E. G., Marder-Eppstein, E., Pantofaru, C., Wise, M., Mösenlechner, L., Meeusen, W., & Holzer, S. (2011). Towards autonomous robotic butlers: Lessons learned with the PR2. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 5568–5575.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, W. P., Parker, C. A., Van der Loos, H. F., & Croft, E. A. (2012). Grip forces and load forces in handovers: Implications for designing human–robot handover controllers. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), Vol. 6, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, W. P., Parker, C. A. C., Van der Loos, H. F. M., & Croft, E. A. (2013). A human-inspired object handover controller. International Journal on Robotics Research (IJRR), 32(8), 971–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edsinger, A., & Kemp, C. C. (2007) Human–robot interaction for cooperative manipulation: Handling objects to one another. In Proceedings of the 2007 symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN).Google Scholar
  6. Elias, H. EtherCAT Dual CAN Hand User Manual, v0. Shadow Robot Company.Google Scholar
  7. Fishel, J., Lin, G., & Loeb, G. E. (2013). Syntouch LLC biotac product manual, v. 16. Technical report.Google Scholar
  8. Gómez-Eguíluz, A., Rañó, I., Coleman, S., & McGinnity, T. M. (2016). A multi-modal approach to continuous material identification through tactile sensing. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS).Google Scholar
  9. Gómez-Eguíluz, A., Rañó, I., Coleman, S., & McGinnity, T. M. (2017a). Reliable object handover through tactile force sensing and effort control in the shadow robot hand. In IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA).Google Scholar
  10. Gómez-Eguíluz, A., Rañó, I., Coleman, S., & McGinnity, T. M. (2017b). Towards robot–human reliable hand-over: Continuous detection of object perturbation force direction. In 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN).Google Scholar
  11. Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., Brandt, T., & Glasauer, S. (2008). Human–robot interaction in handing-over tasks. In 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp. 107–112.Google Scholar
  12. Kappassov, Z., Corrales, J.-A., & Perdereau, V. (2015). Tactile sensing in dexterous robot hands. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 74, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, I., & Inooka, H. (1992). Hand-over of an object between human and robot. In IEEE international workshop on robot and human communication, pp. 199–203.Google Scholar
  14. Konstantinova, J., Krivic, S., Stilli, A., Piater, J., & Althoefer, K. (2017). Autonomous object handover using wrist tactile information. In Conference towards autonomous robotic systems, Springer, pp. 450–463.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, H., Nguyen, K. C., Perdereau, V., Bimbo, J., Back, J., Godden, M., et al. (2015). Finger contact sensing and the application in dexterous hand manipulation. Autonomous Robots, 39(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Medina-Hernández, J. R., Duvallet, F., Karnam, M., & Billard, A. (2016). A human-inspired controller for fluid human–robot handovers. In IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (humanoids), pp. 324–331.Google Scholar
  17. Nagata, K., Oosaki, Y., Makikura, M., & Tsukune, H. (1998). Delivery by hand between human and robot based on fingertip force-torque information. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp. 750–757.Google Scholar
  18. Parastegari, S., Noohi, E., Abbasi, B., & Zefran, M. (2016). A fail-safe object handover controller. In IEEE international conference on in robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 2003–2008.Google Scholar
  19. Su, Z., Fishel, J., Yamamoto, T., & Loeb, G. E. (2012). Use of tactile feedback to control exploratory movements to characterize object compliance. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 6, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yousef, H., Boukallel, M., & Althoefer, K. (2011). Tactile sensing for dexterous in-hand manipulation in roboticsa review. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 167(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics, Vision and Control Group (GRVC) ETS IngenieríaUniversity of Seville Camino de los DescubrimientosSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Embodied Systems for Robotics and Learning, Mærsk McKinney Møller InstituteUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  3. 3.Intelligent Systems Research CentreUlster UniversityLondonderryUK

Personalised recommendations