Advertisement

Atomic Energy

, Volume 124, Issue 4, pp 244–250 | Cite as

Nuclear Rocket Motors: Development Status and Application Prospects

  • A. S. Koroteev
  • V. N. Akimov
  • N. I. Arkhangel’skii
  • E. Yu. Kuvshinova
  • E. I. Muzychenko
Article

The possibility and expediency of using nuclear rocket motors at the present stage of development of rocketspace technology as part of conventional and advanced space means, including the upper stages of carrier rockets and acceleration blocks, reusable interorbital tugs, and a motor assembly of the piloted Martian expedition complex are discussed. It is shown that because of high cost it is not expedient to use NRM in single-use booster blocks and multi-use tugs for transport operations in near-Earth space, since the specific cost of delivering a useful load into high working orbits increases by a factor of 1.5 or more as compared with transport means based on oxygen-hydrogen rocket motors. At the same time, their use for the Martian expedition complex makes it possible to improve considerably the design characteristics of the complex (starting mass and expedition duration) as compared with non-nuclear motor systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. S. Koroteev, A. A. Gafarov, V. P. Smetannikov, et al., “Experience in developing and basic directions of development and application of space nuclear power in Russia,” Byull. At. Energ., No. 9, 51–57, TsNIIatominform (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Robbins and H. Finger, An Historical Perspective of the NERVA Nuclear Rocket Engine Technology Program, NASA-CR-187154 (AIAA-91-3451) (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Gerrish Jr., Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Ground Test History. The Rover/NERVA Program, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL (2014).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Summary Report CY 1970 for Period Ending 30 September 1970. NERVA Program, Aerojet, M001-STR04- W234ald (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Gerrish, G. Doughty, and S. Bhattacharyya, “Affordable development and qualification strategy for nuclear thermal propulsion,” in: 49th Joint Propulsion Conf., US, San Jose, AIAA 2013-4161.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conceptual Design of Nuclear Rocket Motor for Problems of Assimilating Space. Project No. 335, Vol. 1, Conceptual Design of an RM for a Lunar Tug, MNTTs 335–96 (1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. S. Koroteev, A. A. Gafarov, V. P. Smetannikov, et al., “Experience in developing and basic directions of development and application of space nuclear power in Russia,” Byull. At. Energ., No. 10, 31–36, TsNIIatominform (2003).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. V. Barinov, M. S. Belyakov, V. D. Kolganov, et al., “Concept of a cruising nuclear energy propulsion system for a piloted expedition to Mars (Project MNTTs No. 2120),” in: Int. Conf. on Nuclear Power in Space–2005, Moscow–Podolsk (2005), pp. 489–497.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Borowski, R. Sefcik, and J. Fittje, “Affordable development and demonstration of a small NTR engine and stage: how small is big enough?” in: AIAA Space & Astronautics Forum & Exposition (Space 2015), US, Pasadena, AIAA 2015-4524.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Koroteev
    • 1
  • V. N. Akimov
    • 1
  • N. I. Arkhangel’skii
    • 1
  • E. Yu. Kuvshinova
    • 1
  • E. I. Muzychenko
    • 1
  1. 1.State Scientific Center – Keldysh CenterMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations