Atomic Energy

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 55–60 | Cite as

Evaluation of the irradiation dose rate for marine biota in the region of the destroyed fukushima reactor (japan) in march–may 2011

  • I. I. Kryshev
  • T. G. Sazykina

The irradiation dose rate in March–May 2011 is evaluated for marine biota in the coastal zone near the destroyed Fukushima reactor and in the open sea. It is shown that for representative marine organisms (fish and mollusks) the irradiation dose rate did not exceed the safe level 0.4 mGy/h (10 mGy/day). In the open sea, 30 km from the nuclear power plant, the irradiation of marine biota is much lower than in the coastal zone near the nuclear power plant. A comparative evaluation is made of the irradiation dose rate for water organisms in the exclusion zones of the Eastern-Urals track of radioactivity and the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plants.


Radionuclide Coastal Zone Nuclear Power Plant Mollusk Marine Biota 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Detection of Radioactive Materials from Seawater near Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station, with Attachments, TEPCO Press Releases, No. 1–47, March 21, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Readings of the Sea Area Monitoring at the Post Out of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, News Releases, 24.03–8.05, 2011, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, MEXT (2011).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ulanovsky and G. Pröhl, “Tables of dose conversion coefficients for estimating the internal and external radiation exposures to terrestrial and aquatic biota,” Rad. Environ. Biophys., 47, No. 2, 195–203 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Effects of Radiation on the Environment, UNSCEAR 2008 Rep. to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, Vol. II. Scientific Annex E. Effect of Ionizing Radiation on Non-Human Biota, New York (2011).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu. V. Sivintsev, S. M. Vakulovskii, A. P. Vasiliev, et al., Technogenic Radionuclides in Seas Laving Russia. Radioecological Consequences of Radwaste Disposal in the Arctic and Far-East Seas (White Book-2000), IzdAT, Moscow (2005).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sediment Distribution Coefficients and Concentration Factors for Radionuclides for Biota in the Marine Environment, Techn. Rep., Ser. No. 422, IAEA, Vienna (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Aquatic Organisms, NCRP Rep., No. 109, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (1991).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. I. Kryshev and E. P. Ryazantsev, Environmental Safety of the Nuclear Power Complex of Russia, IzdAT, Moscow (2010).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. I. Kryshev, R. M. Aleksakhin, I. N. Ryabov, et al., Radioecological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident, Yad. Obsh. SSSR, Moscow (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. M. Aleksakhin, L. A. Buldakov, V. A. Gubanov, et al., Large-Scale Radiation Accidents: Consequences and Protective Measures, IzdAT, Moscow (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. I. Kryshev
    • 1
  • T. G. Sazykina
    • 1
  1. 1.Scientific-Industrial Association TaifunObninskRussia

Personalised recommendations