Atomic Energy

, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp 194–201 | Cite as

Correcting the isotopic composition of regenerated uranium with respect to 232U by a centrifuge method with introduction of a carrier gas

  • V. N. Prusakov
  • A. A. Sazykin
  • L. Yu. Sosnin
  • D. V. Utrobin
  • A. N. Chel’tsov
Article

Theoretical and experimental studies dealing with correcting the isotopic composition of regenerated uranium with respect to 232U by a centrifuge method with introduction of a carrier gas are reported. In order to increase the efficiency of separating 232U from the spent uranium and reduce the loss of 235U, the use of a carrier gas is proposed – the gaseous compound 12C8H3F13, which is inert to uranium hexafluoride, and whose molecular weight, Mc = 346 amu, matches that of 232UF6. Freon, C8H3F13, is shown not to decompose during operation in the rotor of a centrifuge or to interact with the centrifuge material. The measured absorption parameters of freon on sodium fluoride NaF confirm the feasibility of efficient separation of a mixture of uranium hexafluoride and freon with return of the freon to the separation process. It is shown that introducing a carrier gas into the centrifuge technology can yield some new results: lowering the radioactivity of the commercial product, normalizing the overall radiation situation during production, increasing the recovered 235U in the commercial product, and reducing the volume of radioactive waste. The recovery of 235U in the commercial product can be increased to 99% or more. Then the 232U content in the commercial product is ∼2·10−8% or a factor of 10 less than the maximum allowable content of 2·10−7%.

Keywords

Uranium Spend Nuclear Fuel Uranium Isotope Outlet Flow Uranium Hexafluoride 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. V. Nikipelov and V. B. Nikipelov, “The fate of uranium regenerate,” Byul. At. Ener., No. 9, pp. 34–43 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. V. Mateveev and E.M. Tsenter, Uranium-232 and Its Effect on the Radiation Situation in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle [in Russian], Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. I. Abakumov, V. A. Bazhenov, V. I. Sergeev, et al., “Development and industrial application of gas centrifuges for uranium enrichment in the USSR,” At. Énerg., 67, 255–257 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. A. Suvorov and A.N. Tcheltsov, “Stable enriched isotopes and the use of isotope targets for radioisotope production,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A282, 286–289 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. A. Suvorov, A. N. Tcheltsov, L. Yu. Sosnin, et al., “Centrifugal extraction of highly enriched tin isotopes and increase of the specific activity of the radionuclide 119mSn on the gas centrifuge cascade,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A480, 22–28 (2002).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Yu. Sosnin, A. N. Tcheltsov, I. A. Suvorov, et al., “Centrifugal extraction of highly enriched 120Te and 122Te using the non-steady state method of separation,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A480, 36–39 (2002).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. N. Prusakov
    • 1
  • A. A. Sazykin
    • 1
  • L. Yu. Sosnin
    • 1
  • D. V. Utrobin
    • 1
  • A. N. Chel’tsov
    • 1
  1. 1.Russian Scientific Center Kurchatov InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations