Assessment of the Effect of Temporary Storage Sites for Radioactive Wastes on the Territory of the Russian Science Center Kurchatov Institute on the Population and the Environment
The presence of nuclear objects in an urban environment, next to homes, always creates stress. The presence of the Russian Science Center Kurchatov Institute in Moscow confirms this. In this article, an attempt is made to show by a computational-analytical method the origin of this hazard, and the real radiation levels, additional to the natural background radiation, from the temporary storage sites are presented. It is shown that under the present conditions the contents of the temporary storage sites do not present any danger to the people living nearby.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.E. Ryazantsev, V. Kolyadin, B. Bylkin, et al., “On the problems of safety of nuclear installations in big cities,” Preprint RRC-KI 6184/7 (2000).Google Scholar
- 2.Spatial Redistribution of Radionuclides Within Catchments: Development of GIS-Based Models for Decision Support Systems. Spartacus Project, Final Report Utrecht University (2000).Google Scholar
- 3.N. Ponomarev-Stepnoi, V. Volkov, N. Khukharkin, et al., “Rehabilitation of radioactively contaminated objects at the territory of RRC KI,” in: Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Radwaste Management WM'02, Tucson, Arizona USA, February 24–28, 2002, pp. 68–79.Google Scholar
- 4.Conversion Coefficients for Use in Radiological Protection Against External Radiation, ICRP Publication 74, Ann ICRP 26(3/4), Pergamon Press, Oxford (1996).Google Scholar
- 5.International Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety Series No. 115, IAEA, Vienna (1996).Google Scholar
- 6.Manual for Establishing Admissable Emissions of Radioactive Substances into the Atmosphere DV-98, Vol. 1, Obligatory Part, Goskomekologiya Rossii, Moscow, Minatom RF (1999).Google Scholar
- 7.K. Nickholson, “A review of particle resuspension,” Atmos. Environ., 22, 2639–2651 (1988).Google Scholar