Advertisement

Forecasting of ionospheric TEC for different latitudes, seasons and solar activity conditions based on OKSM

  • R. MukeshEmail author
  • V. Karthikeyan
  • P. Soma
  • P. Sindhu
Original Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Ionosphere is the upper atmosphere region that contains sufficient number of electrons which disturb the propagation of radio signal travel from navigational satellite to ground/user receiver. Ionospheric delay in range measurement is related to its Total Electron Content (TEC). Ionospheric delay results in range error and degrades the user position accuracy of navigational satellite systems such as Global Positioning System (GPS) and Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS). Hence a suitable TEC prediction model to correct the range delay in single frequency range measurement is necessary. In dual frequency receiver, ionospheric delay is estimated and eliminated using the two range measurements performed at the same time. This paper describes the TEC prediction methodology using Ordinary Kriging based Surrogate Model (OKSM). OKSM is evaluated using the data received and collected from the IRNSS receiver station installed at ACS College of Engineering (ACSCE), Bengaluru (12.8913 °N, 77.4658 °E), India and other International GNSS Service (IGS) network stations. IRNSS TEC data (January 2018) is calculated by using dual frequency (L5 & S) pseudo range method and TEC is smoothed by normal cubic smoothing spline method. IRNSS Vertical TEC (VTEC) is predicted from 16 January 2018 to 26 January 2018 by using previous six days of estimated VTEC values. Similarly, GPS VTEC for IGS station at IISC, Bengaluru is also predicted for same duration to validate the developed OKSM. In order to evaluate the performance of the developed forecasting model for different geographic locations, solar activity conditions and seasons, the VTEC is predicted and analyzed for different latitude regions such as low-latitude PHON station (6.9599 °N, 158.2101 °E), mid-latitude ALGO station (45.9588 °N, −78.0714 °E) and high-latitude NRIL station (69.3618 °N, 88.3597 °E) during different solar activity conditions (Low-2008, Medium-2011 and High-2013 solar activity) and during different seasons (spring, summer, rainy and winter) in the year 2017. From the analysis of OKSM prediction results, it is observed that, RMSE of predicted TEC varies from 0.79 to 3.6 TECU, MAE is 0.4 to 3 TECU and MAPE is within 40% for ionospheric quiet days. VTEC is also predicted during storm days (26 October 2003 to 31 October 2003). To study the performance of the model, VTEC prediction results of OKSM are compared with prediction results from Standard Persistence Model (SPM) and VTEC derived from International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2016) model. The RMSE of OKSM is 1.9679 TECU, MAE is 1.245 TECU and MAPE is 9%, whereas for SPM, RMSE is 4.8372 TECU, MAE is 3.7496 TECU and MAPE is 36%. Similarly, for IRI-2016 model, RMSE is 7.9 TECU, MAE is 7.1976 TECU and MAPE is 66%. Therefore, TEC predictions by OKSM are better than SPM and IRI-2016. The results show that the OKSM is useful for applications in ionospheric studies.

Keywords

Total electron content VTEC forecast OKSM GPS IRNSS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research work presented in this paper has been carried out under the project entitled “Surrogate model for ionospheric studies using IRNSS/GPS Data”, funded by SAC, ISRO, Ahmedabad. We also thankful to NASA website, for providing input parameters which are necessary for our database creation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Availability of data and Material  The datasets used and analyzed in the current study are taken from the NavIC SPS receiver located at ACSCE station and IISC station, Bangalore. The input parameters are taken from https://www.nasa.gov/ and http://www.ionolab.org/ website.

Competing Interests  The authors declare that there are no financial and non-financial competing interests with respect to the current research work. The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Funding  This research work is funded by SAC, ISRO, Ahmedabad (Project ID–NGP–13).

Author’s Contribution  R. Mukesh and P. Soma constructed the Surrogate Model; P. Sindhu analyzed and interpreted the data regarding the VTEC prediction. V. Karthikeyan performed the validation of VTEC prediction and checked the formation and quality of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Acharya, R., Roy, B., Sivaraman, M.R., Dasgupta, A.: Prediction of ionospheric total electron content using adaptive neural network with in-situ learning algorithm. Adv. Space Res. 47(1), 115–123 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.08.016 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badeke, R., Borries, C., Hoque, M., Minkwitz, D.: Empirical forecast of quiet time ionospheric total electron content maps over Europe. Adv. Space Res. 61(12), 2881–2890 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.04.010 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balu, R., Selvakumar, U., Nikolaos, A.: Effect of variogram types on surrogate model based optimisation of aircraft wing shapes. Proc. Eng. 38, 2713–2725 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilitza, D., Reinisch, B.W.: International reference ionosphere 2007: improvements and new parameters. Adv. Space Res. 42, 599–609 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.07.048 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyson, P.L., Bennett, J.A.: A model of the vertical distribution of the electron concentration in the ionosphere and its application to oblique propagation studies. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 50(3), 251–262 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(88)90074-8 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. El-Rabbany, A.: Introduction to GPS: The Global Positioning System, 2nd revised edn. Artech House Publishers, Boston (2006). ISBN 1-59693-016-0 Google Scholar
  7. Gulyaeva, T.L.: Regional analytical model of ionospheric total electron content: monthly mean and standard deviation. Radio Sci. 34(6), 1507–1512 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RS900080 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habarulema, J.B., McKinnell, L., Cilliers, P.J., Opperman, B.D.L.: Application of neural networks to South African GPS TEC modeling. Adv. Space Res. 43(11), 1711–1720 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.08.020 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jouhaud, J.C., Sagaut, P., Montagnac, M., Laurenceau, J.: A surrogate-model based multidisciplinary shape optimization method with application to a 2d subsonic airfoil. Comput. Fluids 36(3), 520–529 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.04.001 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Kersley, L., Malan, D., Pryse, S.E., Cander, L.R., Bamford, R.A., Belehaki, A., Leitinger, R., Radicella, S.M., Mitchell, C.N., Spencer, P.S.J.: Total electron content—a key parameter in propagation: measurement and use in ionospheric imaging. Ann. Geophys. 47(2–3), 1067–1091 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klobuchar, J.A.: Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency GPS users. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 23(3), 325–331 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1987.310829 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meza, A., Gende, M., Brunini, C., Radicella, S.M.: Evaluating the accuracy of ionospheric range delay corrections for navigation at low latitude. Adv. Space Res. 36(3), 546–551 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.053 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukesh, R., Lingadurai, K., Selvakumar, U.: Kriging methodology for surrogate-based airfoil shape optimization. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(10), 7363–7373 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1327-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mukesh, R., Karthikeyan, V., Soma, P., Sindhu, P., Elangovan, R.R.: Performance analysis of navigation with Indian constellation satellites. J. King Saud Univ., Eng. Sci. (2019a).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2019.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mukesh, R., Soma, P., Karthikeyan, V., Sindhu, P.: Prediction of ionospheric vertical total electron content from GPS data using ordinary kriging-based surrogate model. Astrophys. Space Sci. 364, 15 (2019b).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-019-3502-7 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nava, B., Coisson, P., Radicella, S.M.: A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 70(15), 1856–1862 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Naveen, P.S., Arun Sundar, S., Srinivasan, T., Savithri, S.: Mathematical modelling of Indian regional navigation satellite system receiver. Def. Sci. J. 67(4), 443–448 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.67.11547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rastogi, R.G., Sharma, R.P.: Ionospheric electron content at Ahmedabad (near the crest of equatorial anomaly) by using beacon satellite transmissions during half a solar cycle. Planet. Space Sci. 19(11), 1505–1517 (1971).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(71)90010-9 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarma, A.D., VenkataRatnam, D., Krishna Reddy, D.: Modelling of low latitude ionosphere using modified planar fit method for GAGAN. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 3(6), 609–619 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sayin, I., Arikan, F., Arikan, O.: Regional TEC mapping with random field priors and kriging. Radio Sci. 43(5), 1–14 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RS003786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharma, K., Dabas, R.S., Ravindran, S.: Study of total electron content variations over equatorial and low latitude ionosphere during extreme solar minimum. Astrophys. Space Sci. 341(2), 277–286 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1133-3 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sivavaraprasad, G., Ratnam, D.V.: Performance evaluation of ionospheric time delay forecasting models using GPS observations at a low-latitude station. Adv. Space Res. 60(2), 475–490 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.031 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Song, R., Zhang, X., Zhou, C., Liu, J., He, J.: Predicting TEC in China based on the neural networks optimized by genetic algorithm. Adv. Space Res. 62(4), 745–759 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.03.043 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stanislawska, I., Juchnikowski, G., Cander, L.R., Ciraolo, L., Bradley, P.A., Zbyszynski, Z., Swiatek, A.: The kriging method of TEC instantaneous mapping. Adv. Space Res. 29(6), 945–948 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00050-9 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sun, S., Egerstedt, M.B., Martin, C.F.: Control theoretic smoothing splines. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 45(12), 2271–2279 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1109/9.895563 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu, C.C., Liou, K., Shan, S.J., Tseng, C.L.: Variation of ionospheric total electron content in Taiwan region of the equatorial anomaly from 1994 to 2003. Adv. Space Res. 41(4), 611–616 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.013 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ya’acob, N., Abdullah, M., Ismail, M.: GPS total electron content (TEC) prediction at ionosphere layer over the equatorial region. Trends Telecommun. Technol. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.5772/8474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Mukesh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. Karthikeyan
    • 2
  • P. Soma
    • 1
  • P. Sindhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringACS College of EngineeringBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECEDr. MGR Educational and Research InstituteChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations