Effects of Individual Difference Variables, Gender, and Exclusivity of Sexual Attraction on Volunteer Bias in Sexuality Research
Sexuality research is often regarded as more intrusive than other types of research, contributing to sample self-selection biases. Researchers have consistently found that volunteers and non-volunteers for sexuality studies differ on a number of sexuality-related variables. Despite a large number of studies examining volunteer biases, relatively few have examined the effects of gender and exclusivity of sexual attraction on willingness to volunteer. Given that comparisons on the basis of gender and/or sexual attraction are frequently made in sexuality studies, understanding how these factors may contribute to volunteer bias is particularly important. In the current study, we investigated the impact of gender and sexual attraction, as well as individual difference variables, on hypothetical willingness to volunteer for a variety of sexuality studies, including new measurement technologies not previously investigated. Greater proportions of men and individuals with any degree of same-gender attraction reported that they were willing to volunteer for eye tracking and psychophysiology studies, whereas there were no significant effects of gender or sexual attraction on willingness to volunteer for sexuality surveys. The proportions of volunteers willing to participate were inversely related to study invasiveness. Greater sexual experience and more positive sexual attitudes were significant predictors of willingness to volunteer, whereas gender, sexual attraction, and other sexuality characteristics were not significant predictors. Implications of volunteer bias for research findings are discussed. Strategies to minimize volunteer bias and to examine whether or not recruited samples differ from the population are provided.
KeywordsVolunteer bias Sex research Gender Sexual attraction Individual differences
This research was supported in part by an Ontario Trillium Scholarship and an Ontario Graduate Scholarship awarded to Samantha J. Dawson, and Canadian Institute for Health Research New Investigator Awards awarded to Meredith L. Chivers and to Caroline F. Pukall. This paper was presented at the annual meetings of the Canadian Sex Research Forum in Kelowna, BC, Canada, 2015, and the Society for Sex Therapy and Research in Montreal, QC, Canada, 2017.
- Bouchard, K. N., Huberman, J. S., Dawson, S. J., McInnis, M. K., Pukall, C. F., & Chivers, M. L. (2015, October). Just do it: Examining psychosexual differences among actual, hypothetical, and nonvolunteers in sex research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Sex Research Forum, Kelowna, BC.Google Scholar
- Huberman, J. S., McInnis, M. K., Bouchard, K. N., Dawson, S. J., Pukall, C. F., & Chivers, M. L. (2019). Exploring comfort levels and the role of compensation in sexual psychophysiology study participation. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1458-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mercer, C. H., Tanton, C., Prah, P., Erens, B., Sonnenberg, P., Clifton, S., … Copas, A. J. (2013). Changes in sexual attitudes and lifestyles in Britain through the life course and over time: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). The Lancet, 382, 1781–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar