Advertisement

A Structural Equation Model of Sexual Satisfaction and Relationship Functioning Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Assigned Female at Birth in Diverse Relationships

  • Christina DyarEmail author
  • Michael E. Newcomb
  • Brian Mustanski
  • Sarah W. Whitton
Original Paper

Abstract

While there is a sizeable literature on sexual satisfaction among male–female mixed-sex couples, research examining other types of relationships (e.g., same-sex) is limited. The current study aimed to broaden our understanding of sexual satisfaction across the diverse relationships of sexual and gender minority individuals assigned female at birth (SGM-AFAB) and inform models of sexual satisfaction for this population. We examined: (1) differences in sexual satisfaction and characteristics of sexual activity (frequency of sex, frequency of orgasm, duration of sex) by relationship type (same-sex, mixed-sex, gender-diverse) among SGM-AFAB; (2) a model of sexual satisfaction and its correlates; and (3) differences in this model by relationship type. Results indicated cisgender women in relationships with cisgender women (same-sex) reported higher duration of sex, frequency of orgasm, and sexual satisfaction compared to cisgender women in relationships with cisgender men (mixed-sex). There were few differences in characteristics of sexual activity between SGM-AFAB in gender-diverse relationships (involving one or more gender minority partners) and those in same- or mixed-sex relationships. Results indicated similarities across relationship types in a model of sexual satisfaction and its correlates. For all relationship types, more frequent and longer duration of sexual activity predicted higher orgasm frequency, more frequent orgasm predicted higher sexual satisfaction, and higher sexual satisfaction predicted better relationship functioning. Only the association between orgasm frequency and sexual satisfaction varied by relationship type. As one of the first studies examining sexual satisfaction among SGM-AFAB in mixed-sex and gender-diverse relationships, findings substantially further our understanding of sexual satisfaction in this population.

Keywords

Sexual minority Gender minority Sexual functioning Sexual relationships Sexual orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant No. R01HD086170). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health or the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and/or national research committee (Northwestern University Internal Review Board STU00203054) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Armstrong, H. L., & Reissing, E. D. (2013). Women who have sex with women: A comprehensive review of the literature and conceptual model of sexual function. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 28, 364–399.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2013.807912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaber, T. E., & Werner, P. D. (2009). The relationship between anxiety and sexual functioning in lesbians and heterosexual women. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birnie-Porter, C., & Lydon, J. E. (2013). A prototype approach to understanding sexual intimacy through its relationship to intimacy. Personal Relationships, 20, 236–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair, K. L., Cappell, J., & Pukall, C. F. (2018). Not all orgasms were created equal: differences in frequency and satisfaction of orgasm experiences by sexual activity in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 55, 719–733.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1303437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, K. L., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Can less be more? Comparing duration vs. frequency of sexual encounters in same-sex and mixed-sex relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23, 123–136.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work and sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  7. Bridges, S. K., & Horne, S. G. (2007). Sexual satisfaction and desire discrepancy in same sex women’s relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 41–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230600998466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, N. R. (2010). The sexual relationships of sexual-minority women partnered with trans men: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Burch, B. (1982). Psychological merger in lesbian couples: A joint ego psychological and systems approach. Family Therapy, 9, 201.Google Scholar
  11. Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113–118.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. N., & Byers, E. S. (2014). Beyond lesbian bed death: Enhancing our understanding of the sexuality of sexual-minority women in relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, E. M., Hoon, P. W., & Hoon, E. F. (1983). Arousability and sexual satisfaction in lesbian and heterosexual women. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costantino, A., Cerpolini, S., Alvisi, S., Morselli, P. G., Venturoli, S., & Meriggiola, M. C. (2013). A prospective study on sexual function and mood in female-to-male transsexuals during testosterone administration and after sex reassignment surgery. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 39, 321–335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.736920.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cutrona, C. E. (1989). Ratings of social support by adolescents and adult informants: Degree of correspondence and prediction of depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diamond, L. M. (2000). Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period. Developmental Psychology, 36, 241–250.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Flores, A., Herman, J., Gates, G., & Brown, T. (2016). How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Galbraith, S., Bowden, J., & Mander, A. (2017). Accelerated longitudinal designs: an overview of modelling, power, costs and handling missing data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 26, 374–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Laurenceau, J. P., Nemoto, T., & Operario, D. (2014). Gender minority stress, mental health, and relationship quality: A dyadic investigation of transgender women and their cisgender male partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 437–447.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Garcia, J. R., Lloyd, E. A., Wallen, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2014). Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of U.S. singles. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 2645–2652.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gates, G. J. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? UCLA: The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09h684X2
  25. Harrison, J., Grant, J., & Herman, J. L. (2012). A gender not listed here: Genderqueers, gender rebels, and otherwise in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. LGBTQ Public Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School, 2, 13–24.Google Scholar
  26. Henderson, A. W., Lehavot, K., & Simoni, J. M. (2009). Ecological models of sexual satisfaction among lesbian/bisexual and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Sex and romantic love: Connects and disconnects. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 159–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Hendricks, M. L., & Testa, R. J. (2012). A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: An adaptation of the minority stress model. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice, 43, 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmberg, D., Blair, K. L., & Phillips, M. (2010). Women’s sexual satisfaction as a predictor of well-being in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902898710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iasenza, S. (2002). Beyond “lesbian bed death” the passion and play in lesbian relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, C., Stanley, S., Glenn, N., Amato, P., Nock, S., & Markman, H. (2002). Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 Baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce (S02096 OKDHS). Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  34. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Gouin, J.-P., & Hantsoo, L. (2010). Close relationships, inflammation, and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.596954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuyper, L., & Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2011). Examining sexual health differences between lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual adults: The role of sociodemographics, sexual behavior characteristics, and minority stress. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 263–274.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224491003654473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (2008). National Health and Social Life Survey, 1992. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06647.v2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loulan, J. (1984). Lesbian sex. San Francisco: Spinsters Ink.Google Scholar
  40. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews, A. K., Tartaro, J., & Hughes, T. L. (2003). A comparative study of lesbian and heterosexual women in committed relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7, 101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v07n01_07.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mustanski, B., Garofalo, R., & Emerson, E. M. (2010). Mental health disorders, psychological distress, and suicidality in a diverse sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youths. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2426–2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nichols, M. (1995). Sexual desire disorder in a lesbian-feminist couple: The intersection of therapy and politics. In R. C. Rosen & S. R. Leiblum (Eds.), Case studies in sex therapy (pp. 161–175). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nichols, M. (2004). Lesbian sexuality/female sexuality: Rethinking ‘lesbian bed death’. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19, 363–371.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990412331298036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perez-Brumer, A., Day, J. K., Russell, S. T., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among transgender youth in California: Findings from a representative, population-based sample of high school students. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56, 739–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pew Research Center. (2013). A survey of LGBT Americans: Attitudes, experiences and values in changing times. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/baf418/Downloads/SDT_LGBT-Americans_06-2013.pdf. Accessed February 2018Google Scholar
  49. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.  https://doi.org/10.2307/271063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reisner, S. L., Gamarel, K. E., Nemoto, T., & Operario, D. (2014a). Dyadic effects of gender minority stressors in substance use behaviors among transgender women and their non-transgender male partners. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reisner, S. L., White, J. M., Bradford, J. B., & Mimiaga, M. J. (2014b). Transgender health disparities: Comparing full cohort and nested matched-pair study designs in a community health center. LGBT Health, 1, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosen, R. C., & Bachmann, G. A. (2008). Sexual well-being, happiness, and satisfaction, in women: The case for a new conceptual paradigm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 291–297.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230802096234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanchez, D. T., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Crocker, J. (2011). Relationship contingency and sexual motivation in women: Implications for sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 99–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9593-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference Chi square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schick, V., Rosenberger, J. G., Herbenick, D., Calabrese, S. K., & Reece, M. (2012). Bidentity: Sexual behavior/identity congruence and women’s sexual, physical and mental well-being. Journal of Bisexuality, 12, 178–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2012.674855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schick, V., Rosenberger, J. G., Herbenick, D., Collazo, E., Sanders, S. A., & Reece, M. (2016). The behavioral definitions of “having sex with a man” and “having sex with a woman” identified by women who have engaged in sexual activity with both men and women. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 578–587.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1061632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Scott, S. B., Ritchie, L., Knopp, K., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2018). Sexuality within female same-gender couples: Definitions of sex, sexual frequency norms, and factors associated with sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 681–692.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1077-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Shindel, A. W., Rowen, T. S., Lin, T. C., Li, C. S., Robertson, P. A., & Breyer, B. N. (2012). An Internet survey of demographic and health factors associated with risk of sexual dysfunction in women who have sex with women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1261–1271.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02659.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, A. M., Patrick, K., Heywood, W., Pitts, M. K., Richters, J., Shelley, J. M., … Ryall, R. (2012). Sexual practices and the duration of last heterosexual encounter: Findings from the Australian longitudinal study of health and relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tracy, J. K., & Junginger, J. (2007). Correlates of lesbian sexual functioning. Journal of Women’s Health, 16, 499–509.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.0308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Vaughn, M. J., & Matyastik Baier, M. E. (1999). Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/019261899262023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weyers, S., Elaut, E., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., T’Sjoen, G., Heylens, G., … Verstraelen, H. (2009). Long-term assessment of the physical, mental, and sexual health among transsexual women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 752–760.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01082.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Whitton, S. W., Dyar, C., Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2019). Intimate partner violence experiences of young sexual and gender minorities assigned female at birth. Psychology of Women Quarterly. (in press).Google Scholar
  65. Wierckx, K., Van Caenegem, E., Schreiner, T., Haraldsen, I., Fisher, A., Toye, K., … T’Sjoen, G. (2014). Cross-sex hormone therapy in trans persons is safe and effective at short-time follow-up: Results from the European network for the investigation of gender incongruence. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 1999–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood, N. D., Akloubou Gnonhosou, D. C., & Bowling, J. (2015). Combining parallel and exploratory factor analysis in identifying relationship scales in secondary data. Marriage & Family Review, 51, 385–395.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Dyar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael E. Newcomb
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brian Mustanski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sarah W. Whitton
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and WellbeingNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations