Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Hunting for Snarks: A Reply to McPhail (2019a)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.

  2. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin,52, 281–302.

  3. Gonçalves, L. C., Rossegger, A., & Gerth, J. (2018). Sexual sadism among sex offenders in Switzerland. Sexual Abuse.

  4. Haslam, N., & Cleland, C. (2002). Taxometric analysis of fuzzy categories: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Assessment,90(2), 401–404.

  5. Knight, R. A., Sims-Knight, J., & Guay, J. P. (2013). Is a separate diagnostic category defensible for paraphilic coercion? Journal of Criminal Justice,41, 90–99.

  6. Lahey, B. B., & Waldman, I. D. (2003). A developmental propensity model of the origins of conduct problems during childhood and adolescence. In B. B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 76–117). New York: The Guilford Press.

  7. Longpré, N., Guay, J. P., & Knight, R. A. (2019a). MTC Sadism Scale: Toward dimensional assessment of severe sexual sadism. Assessment,26(1), 70–84.

  8. Longpré, N., Guay, J. P., Knight, R. A., & Benbouriche, M. (2018). Sadistic offender or sexual sadism? Taxometric evidence for a dimensional structure of sexual sadism. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47(2), 403–416.

  9. Longpré, N., Knight, R. A., & Guay, J. P. (2019b). Latent structure and covariates of the Agonistic Continuum among community sample and college students. Oral presentation at the Australian and New Zealand Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse Conference, Brisbane, Australia.

  10. Longpré, N., Sims-Knight, J. E., Neumann, C., Guay, J. P., & Knight, R. A. (2019c). Is paraphilic coercion a different construct from sadism or simply the lower end of an Agonistic Continuum? Manuscript submitted for publication.

  11. McGrath, R. E. (2008). Inferential errors in taxometric analyses of ordered three-class constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment,90, 11–25.

  12. McGrath, R. E., & Walters, G. D. (2012). Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure. Psychological Methods,17, 284–293.

  13. McPhail, I. V. (2019a). Of dimensions, dichotomies, and trichotomies: Comments on the taxometric ghost that haunts Longpré, Guay, Knight, and Benbouriche (2018) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior.

  14. McPhail, I. V. (2019b). Conceptual and empirical issues in pedohebephilic interest. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.

  15. McPhail, I. V., Olver, M. E., Brouillette-Alarie, S., & Looman, J. (2018). Taxometric analysis of the latent structure of pedophilic interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47(8), 2223–2240.

  16. Meehl, P. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry,1, 108–141.

  17. Meehl, P. E. (1995). Boot straps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist,50(4), 266–275.

  18. Meehl, P. E. (2004). What’s in a taxon? Journal of Abnormal Psychology,113, 39–43.

  19. Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1994). Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports,74, 1059–1274.

  20. Mokros, A., Schilling, F., Weiss, K., Nitschke, J., & Eher, R. (2014). Sadism in sexual offenders: Evidence for dimensionality. Psychological Assessment,26(1), 138–147.

  21. Reale, K. S. (2017). An examination of sadism in sexual homicide: Are investigative awareness and the severity of sadistic behaviour distinctive features? Unpublished master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC.

  22. Reale, K. S., Beauregard, E., & Martineau, M. (2017). Sadism in sexual homicide offenders: Identifying distinct groups. Journal of Clinical Psychology,7(2), 120–133.

  23. Ruscio, J. (2007). The clinician as subject: Practitioners are prone to the same judgment errors as everyone else. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 29–47). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

  24. Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  25. Ruscio, J., & Marcus, D. K. (2007). Detecting small taxa using simulated comparison data: A reanalysis of Beach, Amir, and Bau’s (2005) data. Psychological Assessment,19(2), 241–246.

  26. Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2004). A nontechnical introduction to the taxometric method. Understanding Statistics,3, 151–194.

  27. Ruscio, J., Ruscio, A. M., & Meron, M. (2007). Applying the bootstrap to taxometric analysis: Generating empirical sampling distributions to help interpret results. Multivariate Behavioral Research,42(2), 349–386.

  28. Ruscio, J., Walters, G. D., Markus, D. K., & Kaczetow, W. (2010). Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests. Psychological Assessment,22(1), 5–21.

  29. Stefanska, E. B., Nitschke, J., Carter, A. J., & Mokros, A. (2019). Sadism among sexual homicide offenders: Validation of the Sexual Sadism Scale. Psychological Assessment,31(1), 132–137.

  30. Walters, G. D., McGrath, R. E., & Knight, R. A. (2010). Taxometrics, polytomous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: A Monte Carlo analysis. Psychological Assessment,22, 149–156.

  31. Walters, G. D., & Ruscio, J. (2009). Using comparison data to differentiate categorical and dimensional data by examining factor score distributions: Resolving the mode problem. Psychological Assessment,21(4), 578–594.

  32. Walters, G. D., & Ruscio, J. (2010). Where do we draw the line? Assigning cases to subsamples for MAMBAC, MAXCOV, and MAXEIG taxometric analyses. Assessment,17(3), 321–333.

  33. Walton, K. E., Ormel, J., & Krueger, R. F. (2011). The dimensional nature of externalizing behaviors in adolescence: Evidence from a direct comparison of categorical, dimensional, and hybrid models. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,39(4), 553–561.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Nicholas Longpré.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longpré, N., Knight, R.A., Guay, J. et al. Hunting for Snarks: A Reply to McPhail (2019a). Arch Sex Behav 49, 25–30 (2020).

Download citation