How the Presence of Others Affects Desirability Judgments in Heterosexual and Homosexual Participants
Mate-choice copying is a mating strategy wherein women rely on contextual information to assist in securing accurate assessments of potential mates. Mate-choice copying has been extensively studied in non-human species and has begun to be examined in humans as well. Hill and Buss (2008) found evidence of opposing effects for men and women in desirability judgments based on the presence of other opposite-sex people. The current study successfully replicated these findings with 73 and 44 heterosexual men and women, respectively. Heterosexual men exhibited the desirability diminution effect, and heterosexual women exhibited the desirability enhancement effect. The current study also extended these findings to include 73 gay men and 32 lesbian women. Findings for gay and lesbian participants were inverted compared to heterosexual participants. Gay men exhibited the desirability enhancement effect, and lesbian women exhibited the desirability diminution effect, revealing sex differences in mate-choice copying spanning different sexual orientations.
KeywordsDesirability judgments Mate-choice copying Sexual orientation
This project was in partial fulfillment of the thesis requirements for a Master of Science in Experimental Psychology at Missouri State University. Funding for this project was provided by the Graduate College at Missouri State University. We would like to thank Sarah E. Hill for sharing experimental materials.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. This study was approved by Missouri State University’s Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, and all data upon analysis were completely anonymous.
- Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dugatkin, L. A. (2000). The imitation factor: Evolution beyond the gene. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milonoff, M., Nummi, P., Nummi, O., & Pienmunne, E. (2007). Male friends, not female company, make a man more attractive. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 44(5), 348–354.Google Scholar
- Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
- Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar, D. (2014). R Core Team (2014) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
- Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 320–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Regan, P. C., Medina, R., & Joshi, A. (2001). Partner preferences among homosexual men and women: What is desirable in a sex partner is not necessarily desirable in a romantic partner. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29(7), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.7.625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., Correll, M., & Hodkinson, B. P. (2005). Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: A non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1567), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar