Asexual and Non-Asexual Respondents from a U.S. Population-Based Study of Sexual Minorities
Using a U.S. population-based sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) and other sexual minority (e.g., queer-identified) people, we compared those who identified as asexual (n = 19; 1.66%) and those who were non-asexual (n = 1504; 98.34%). Compared to non-asexual respondents, asexual respondents were more likely to be women or gender non-binary and belong to a younger (ages 18–27) cohort. Asexual individuals were also less likely to have had sex in the past 5 years, compared to non-asexual men, women, and gender non-binary participants, and also reported lower levels of sexual attraction to cisgender men and women than non-asexual women and men, respectively. However, asexual participants did not differ from non-asexual participants in being in an intimate relationship. Asexual respondents felt more stigma than non-asexual men and women, and asexuals reported more everyday discrimination than did non-asexual men. Asexual and non-asexual respondents did not differ in their sense of connectedness to the LGB community. Asexual and non-asexual respondents were as likely to be out to all family, all friends, and all co-workers, but fewer asexual participants were out to all healthcare providers than non-asexual men. The two groups were similar in general well-being, life satisfaction, and social support. In conclusion, asexual identity is an infrequent but unique identity, and one that has the potential to expand the concept of queer identity as well as to destabilize the foregrounding of sexual behavior.
KeywordsAsexual Non-asexual Gallup poll Sexual minorities Gender non-binary
Research reported in this article is part of the Generations Study, supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. R01HD078526. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The Generations investigators are: Ilan H. Meyer, Ph.D., (PI), David M. Frost, Ph.D., Phillip L. Hammack, Ph.D., Marguerita Lightfoot, Ph.D., Stephen T. Russell, Ph.D., and Bianca D.M. Wilson, Ph.D. (Co-Investigators, listed alphabetically).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study had IRB approval, and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bogaert, A. F. (2012). Understanding asexuality. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Cerankowski, K. J., & Milks, M. (2010). New orientations: Asexuality and its implications for theory and practice. Feminist Studies, 36, 650–664. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27919126.
- Geary, R. S., Tanton, C., Erens, B., Clifton, S., Prah, P., Wellings, K., et al. (2018). Sexual identity, attraction and behaviour in Britain: The implications of using different dimensions of sexual orientation to estimate the size of sexual minority populations and inform public health interventions. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0189607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ginoza, M. K., Miller, T., & AVEN Survey Team. (2014). The 2014 AVEN Community Census: Preliminary findings. https://asexualcensus.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/preliminary-findings-from-the-2014-aven-community-census/. Accessed October 12, 2018.
- Krueger, E. A., Lin, A., Kittle, K. R., & Meyer, I. H. (2015). Generations: Methodology and Technical Notes, Gallup Quantitative Survey (Version 15). Retrieved from http://www.generations-study.com/methods.
- Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- McDonnell, L., Scott, S., & Dawson, M. (2017). A multidimensional view? Evaluating the different and combined contributions of diaries and interviews in an exploration of asexual identities and intimacies. Qualitative Research, 17, 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116676516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meyer, I. H., Marken, S., Auter, Z., Wilson, B. D. M., & Conron, K. (2019). Asking about sexual orientation in a national general population survey: Do expanded response options improve survey performance with sexual minority respondents? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- Morris, J. F., & Rothblum, E. D. (1999). Who fills out a “lesbian” questionnaire? The interrelationship of sexual orientation, years out, disclosure of sexual orientation, sexual experience with women, and participation in the lesbian community. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00380.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pacho, A. (2013). Establishing asexual identity: The essential, the imaginary, and the collective. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 10(1), 13–35. http://gjss.org.
- Richters, J., Altman, D., Badcock, P. B., Smith, A. M., de Visser, R. O., Grulich, A. E., et al. (2014). Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience: The Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sexual Health, 11, 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar