Advertisement

Sex Work, Marginalization, and Activism in India

  • Gowri VijayakumarEmail author
  • Subadra Panchanadeswaran
  • Shubha Chacko
Commentary

Introduction

Debates over prostitution and sex work are often so polarized that systematic, comprehensive discussions of relevant research and policy are difficult to find. Benoit, Smith, Jansson, Healey, and Magnuson (2018) offer a useful response to this problem in their Target Article. After introducing the general methodological challenges to sex work research and policy, they discuss two broad perspectives on sex work: the “gender inequality” perspective, which underlines the hierarchy of gender relations, and the “social inequality” perspective, which focuses on exploitation of labor. For each perspective, they outline its basic theoretical claims, summarize the existing empirical evidence, explain critiques of the perspective, discuss related policy approaches, and then lay out critiques of these policy approaches.

The great benefit of the Target Article’s approach is that it explores all sides of both perspectives, allowing for an evaluation of each on its own merits. Benoit et...

Notes

References

  1. Agarwala, R. (2013). Informal labor, formal politics, and dignified discontent in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie, T. S., Bradley, J. E., Vanta, U. D., Lowndes, C. M., & Alary, M. (2013). Vulnerability re-assessed: The changing face of sex work in Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh. AIDS Care, 25(3), 378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benoit, C., Smith, M., Jansson, M., Healey, P., & Magnuson, D. (2018). “The prostitution problem”: Claims, evidence, and policy outcomes. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1276-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Breman, J. (1995). Footloose labor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buzdugan, R., Copas, A., Moses, S., Blanchard, J., Isac, S., Ramesh, B. M., & Cowan, F. M. (2010). Devising a female sex work typology using data from Karnataka, India. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(2), 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buzdugan, R., Halli, S. S., & Cowan, F. M. (2009). The female sex work typology in India in the context of HIV/AIDS. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 14(6), 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chacko, S., Panchanadeswaran, S., & Vijayakumar, G. (2016). Sex work as livelihood: Women, men and transgender sex workers in Karnataka. In B. Fernandez, M. Gopal, & O. Ruthven (Eds.), Land, labour and livelihoods (pp. 133–153). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chacko, S., Vijayakumar, G., & Panchanadeswaran, S. (2016). Our secure beliefs and their insecure lives. In P. Darooka (Ed.), Road to rights: Women, social security and protection in India (pp. 130–146). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Government of India Planning Commission. (2013). Press note on poverty estimates, 201112. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://planningcommission.nic.in/news/pre_pov2307.pdf.
  10. Jain, A. K., & Saggurti, N. (2012). The extent and nature of fluidity in typologies of female sex work in southern India: Implications for HIV prevention programs. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 11(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kongelf, A., Bandewar, S. V. S., Bharat, S., & Collumbien, M. (2015). Is scale-up of community mobilisation among sex workers really possible in complex urban environments? The case of Mumbai, India. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0121014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maher, J., Pickering, S., & Gerard, A. (2012). Sex work: Labour, mobility, and sexual services. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Navani-Vazirani, S., Solomon, D., Gopalakrishnan, Heylen, E., Srikrishnan, A. K., Vasudevan, C. K., & Ekstrand, M. L. (2015). Mobile phones and sex work in South India: The emerging role of mobile phones in condom use by female sex workers in two Indian states. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pai, A., Seshu, M., Gupte, M., & VAMP. (2018a). Status of sex workers in India. Sangli: Center for Advocacy on Stigma and Marginalization. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/Ind/INT_CEDAW_NGO_Ind_17395_E.pdf.
  15. Pai, A., Seshu, M. S., & Murthy, L. (2018b). In its haste to rescue sex workers, “anti-trafficking” is increasing their vulnerability. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(28). Retrieved December 10, 2018, from https://www.epw.in/engage/article/raid-and-rescue-how-anti-trafficking-strategies-increase-sex-workers-vulnerability-to-exploitative-practices.
  16. Panchanadeswaran, S., Brazda, M., Barberii, J., & Chacko, S. (2016). Mobile phone technology and sex work in India: Boon or curse? Annals of Global Health, 82(3), 459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2016.04.263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Panchanadeswaran, S., Unnithan, A. M., Chacko, S., Brazda, M., & Kuruppu, S. (2017). What’s technology got to do with it? Exploring the impact of mobile phones on female sex workers’ lives and livelihood in India. Gender, Technology and Development, 21(1–2), 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raveendran, G. (2017). Women and men operators of enterprises in India’s informal sector. Ahmedabad: WIEGO.Google Scholar
  20. Sahni, R., & Shankar, V. K. (2013). Sex work and its linkages with informal labour markets in India: Findings from the first pan-India survey of female sex workers. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/2369.
  21. Shah, S. (2014). Street corner secrets: Sex, work, and migration in the city of Mumbai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UNDP. (2007). Push to open: An appraisal of sex workers’ access to basic services. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/push_to_open.pdf.
  23. Vijayakumar, G. (2018). Is sex work sex or work? Forming collective identity in Bangalore. Qualitative Sociology, 41(3), 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkAdelphi UniversityGarden CityUSA
  3. 3.Solidarity FoundationBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations