Advertisement

Affirmations and Complications About the Uses of Sexual Media Over Time from a Religious Perspective

  • Mark DouglasEmail author
  • Martha Moore-Keish
Commentary

The two of us are surprised and pleased to find ourselves writing a response to the Target Article (Leonhardt, Spencer, Butler, & Theobald, 2018) on sexual media and its influence on short-term and long-term sexual quality. We come to this task not as specialists in sexual media specifically, nor as scholars of sexual behavior generally, nor even as social scientists. We do, however, attend to writings in philosophy and the social sciences as scholars and professors of Christian theology (Moore-Keish) and Christian theological ethics (Douglas), with deep investment in the question of human sexuality in the context of wider questions of what it means to be truly human (theological anthropology).

As a part of the broad field of theological anthropology, human sexuality has played a significant role in the Christian imagination, for better and for worse. The two of us regularly teach a class together at Columbia Theological Seminary on “The Theology and Ethics of Human Sexuality.” In that...

Notes

References

  1. Brown, P. (1988). The body and society: Men, women and sexual renunciation in early christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bynum, C. W. (1982). Jesus as mother: Studies in the spirituality of the High Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bynum, C. W. (1992). Fragmentation and redemption: Essays on gender and the human body in Medieval religion. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, E. (1987). Women in the early church. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Coakley, S. (2002). Powers and submissions: Spirituality, philosophy and gender. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobb, L. S. (2008). Dying to be men: Gender and language in early Christian martyr texts. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farley, M. A. (2007). Just love: A framework for Christian sexual ethics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, E. A. (1993). She who is: They mystery of God in feminist theological discourse. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  9. Julian of Norwich. (1978). Showings (E. Colledge & J. Walsh, Trans.). New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  10. Leonhardt, N. D., Spencer, T. J., Butler, M. H., & Theobald, A. C. (2018). An organizational framework for sexual media’s influence on short-term versus long-term sexual quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1209-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore, S. (1989). Jesus the liberator of desire. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  12. Rogers, E. F. (1999). Sexuality and the Christian body. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Rogers, E. F. (Ed.). (2002). Thelogy and sexuality: Classic and contemporary readings. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Williams, R. (2002). The body’s grace. In E. F. Rogers (Ed.), Theology and sexuality: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 309–321). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia Theological SeminaryDecaturUSA

Personalised recommendations